No you did not. If you think you did, then quote those posts. Put up or be shown to be a liar.
I told you what I thought of the OP just a few posts in. That was addressing it.
The evidence for evolution for Kenny'sID thread
Now, you tell me, what I would have to say in order to appease you, in that you would consider it addressed?
Like I said, they're not mysterious to anyone with a functioning brain.
They don't look like legs to me. So who do I believe here, those that say they are an aid in reproduction, or you, who tells me whales used you to walk on land?
Your ignorance apparently knows no bounds. Not only do you not comprehend the embryological and genetic evidence for hind limbs I've presented, you can't comprehend that fossils are not the only evidence we have for evolution. But since you're being such a smart mouth.
Because I'm being such a "smart mouth"...what?
Are pictures of different animals there suppose to be my punishment for being a smart mouth?
Now lets talk aboiut "*my* ignorance"
Are you actually claiming animals from what you claim are millions of years apart are all the same animal evolving, especially when there is no evolving going on there?
You have what you "say" are legs on one and all the rest are fully legged...not the least bit convincing. Where are the in betweens I asked for? The legs hanging off of or being dragged behind these animals who have not completely evolved, or residuals attached to the ones that are devolving? There would have to be several stages, and that would make for some funky looking animals, of which we definitely should by your reasoning, but see nothing of the sort running around today or in the fossil record, not nearly enough to speak of anyway. Or did they just happen to stop evolving right about the time there are people around to question things?
I told you before it would fall flat of it's face, yet you force me to do this instead of just accepting a kinder "I just don't buy it"
Happy now?
Or will you be dismissing all I said as me being a "smart mouth"? Gotta love how that comment always comes from someone who has nowhere else to turn, but to place meaningless blame.. I'm not doing anything but disagreeing with you, and explaining why, and one need not even be the "smart" part to see the obvious problems with your presentation.
"I don't know anything about science?"
Please, don't even try that again. A person needs little more than common sense to see you are wrong here, at least until you can come up with something to explain the shortcomings, and no one here needs a degree to listen to you explain that to us. Overactive imagination that overlooks so much in order to reach a very bogus conclusion, and I honestly don't see how so-called intelligent scientists can see what you are claiming here is evidence at all for evolution.
You wonder why I ask for proof? Prove these are the same animals evolving when they show absolutely no evidence of evolving...none. You have 4 same land animals and a whale, and attempt to link them/bring the illusion home with no more than for all we know completely fake legs. Even if they were legs, you got NO INBETWEENS. Where are the, short, shorter legs, stages of fins, the blow holes beginning out of the top of the the land animals head? There is no transitioning there at all, just a whale.
Anyone who buys what you claim is happening here as proof or even evidence of evolution, is entirely too gullible.