That is the first time I heard the definition of we not applying to oneself and his audience.
John is definitely saying if he or any of us say this, than Christ is not in us.
In Christ
Daniel
"we" is suggestive; "not" conclusive, in many scriptures; and why I went step by step through 1 John 1.
It is paramount to commonly understand the construct of scripture as well the specific construct of law.
Scripture is knowledge revealed to, for and applicable to ALL men.
Scripture is knowledge revealed of WHAT applies to God and WHAT applies to men.
When knowledge is given, but not yet fulfilled, regarding God, WE WAIT, for when it IS fulfilled; Once fulfilled, that fulfillment is accomplished. Finished!
When knowledge is given, regarding men; Each individual man; is suppose to discover what is required to be accomplished , and decide IF he chooses to fulfill what is required.
Once a man fulfills what is required; that fulfillment is accomplished; and thus the result applies to him.
Regarding the construct of Law. The Law is given in what is called "the POSITIVE".
Meaning....IF thou SHALL....thou SHALL...thou SHALL NOT...etc.
They are POSITIVE directives.
Don't, stop it, quit it, etc. are NEGATIVE directives.
Much of scripture speaks in the POSITIVE ~ to ALL ~ newbies, believers, faithful, unsure, rejectors, etc.
A general term when speaking to a crowd; (preaching, teaching,) is common, (unless you are Jesus Christ Himself who knows all things) that the crowd will be a mix of newbies, believers, faithful, unsure, rejectors, etc.
The speaker using the term "WE", is simply a projection of the "speakers" position; AND
the speaker's speech suggesting that the "crowd" will listen, follow along and CHOOSE to be "included" "WE" in faith, as the speaker is.
And also why; continuously the scripture gives additional scripture "separating" the We "IN" faith, apart from "We" listening, but "NOT IN" faith yet.
It's the same concept that parents can use; when one of their children is miss-behaving, toward another of their children. On one hand; No problem to punish the one. However on the other hand; for both children POSITIVE (rules, which are family laws, requiring no act of Congress); should be reinforced; which is done POSITIVELY ~ to both children; "
We are behaving and loving little children one to the other."
The WE is suggestive, because the fact is; ONE just proved they aren't.
The WE is a projection of reminding the little minds of an expectation for their little minds to dwell on. It is not the punitive part....but rather the POSITIVE part.
Point being "we" does not always carry the same meaning of who it is applying to.
Another example is Jesus' teaching. Disciples would go about announcing Jesus would be speaking at a certain place. Those who wanted to hear, would go an listen.
There was no poll, to see who in the crowd believed, or didn't. The crowd was mixed with all kinds of people, with all kinds of beliefs. And Jesus spoke to the WHOLE crowd, with ONE speech. His teaching was in the style of a Parable. Story style.
Of the crowd listening ~ some thought Jesus words were;
astounding -
others thought - ridiculous and rejected it
others thought - true but not sure of the understanding
others thought - kind of true, but would be better if they tweeked it a bit with their words and "their" understanding.
Nothing has changed - and for the most part as I've have witnessed ~ sadly a great number of men calling themselves Christians....project the mindset of Jesus' teachings would be better if they tweeked it a bit with their words and "their" understanding.
Point being ~ while Jesus spoke to the WHOLE crowd with one speech; He was very clear, of the division of the listeners. And the "WE" always applies to "those" IN FAITH, submitted in true faith. Not the "WE" who change His words, or don't believe His words.
God Bless,
SBC