• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Doctrine of Eternal Torture in Hell

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Maybe fatal flaws due to a couple of proof texts. I don't think their reconciled just not that far removed.
but if it cannot be reconciled with basic comprehension rules then God is made out to be a liar by the contradiction in scripture, right? Right...personally I don't believe God to be a liar so if they want to justify their opinions they need to do so not through "man's logic" but through a study of the word that rightly divides that word, right? Right...so far the only side that even comes close is eternal torment.
Which begs the question of what is actually being said and what is meant.
right! But God wrote or authored, breathed, whatever term you want to put on it, the scriptures as a communication for us. He knows us intimately. He tells us to study the word so that we will not be led astray. when we study the word of God using the rules that tell us an authors intent, only one side of this issue seems to hold weight. When we add challenge to see if it is going to hold up to scrutiny, again, only one version seems to hold up. Even here on this thread, only one version has not been challenged with comprehension rules. Which begs the question, if only one version holds up to truth, why do we believe every other version and if that version that is holding up is false, why isn't anyone challenging it so that it can be proven false? My theory has to do with the idols of tradition and man's superiority more so than anything else. when we worship our traditions or man's wisdom, we fail to worship the ONE TRUE GOD. I'll look forward to what you conclude...as I said, I am determined to know all of the God of the Bible that I can know and where man can help us find that God, God alone can reveal Himself to us. May you find the God you seek and may He guard you from deceptions that come from Satan through man.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married

If you don't like dueling passages then why did you post this passage. I have plainly made the case from Gen 2:7. If you see nothing in Genesis that contradicts 1 Thessalonians then what is your argument and why then did you post the verse?

I've shown several times from Gen 2:7 that God created man from the dust of the earth.

7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being. (Gen. 2:7 NKJ)

This is as plain as can be. Man was formed from the dust of the ground. Man is of the elements of the earth. There's nothing else listed here that was used to create man. However, notice the man isn't alive. It's when God breathes His spirit or breath of life into the man that the man "becomes" a living soul. It's clear from this passage that a soul consist of the man and the breath or spirit of life from God. Two things combine to become another. Man "is" a living soul that consists of the man (dust of the earth) and the breath or spirit of God.

You said that man consists of three parts. That is not correct. The two parts combine to become a third. The man without the breath or spirit of God is not a soul. A soul is a living being. Before God breathed His breath or spirit of life into the man the man was not a soul.

In the passage you quoted Paul simply denotes the whole man, his two components and the life created by their coming together.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
as your trying to figure out a way to reconcile the passages, let me remind you of this passage....Heb. 4:12 where we are told that the soul and spirit are not one and the same thing.

OF course they're not the same thing. One is part of the other. The soul is the living being, the spirit or breath of life from God is what gives life to the body, the man. So, what is the division of soul and spirit. It's simply the taking of one's life. God is able to take back His breath or spirit of life at which point a person dies. The soul requires the spirit or breath of life in order to exist. If God separates them the person dies.
 
Reactions: Hieronymus
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
there are so many flaws in this and so many passages that challenge it, even your claim here of Jesus, John, Paul and Jude saying that the wicked are no more is not at all what those passages say. It would be nice if it was. I have some people dear to me that I fear will face eternity without our Lord, but we cannot allow man's understanding and wisdom to color what scripture says as you are doing here. In fact, if we boil all of this down what we come up with is this quote...."Opposite of life is death---life is consciousness, awareness, existence. Death is lack of consciousness, lack of awareness, lack of existence. Eternal life is eternal consciousness, eternal existence, eternal awareness. Eternal death is eternal unconsciousness, eternal nonexistence." which relies on man's logic to come to that conclusion not a study of the word of God using comprehension rules. And this is the best argument so far for temporal or no punishment and it falls terribly short of the litmus test I proposed.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
It is not saying the ability to think ends, but that the
thoughts of what a man wanted to do in this life
perish.

Really? Where do you see that in the passage? This argument is really circular reasoning. Your argument assumes what it's trying to prove. The premise of the argument is that man can think when he's dead. Your statement then says the passage only applies to this life.
 
Reactions: Hieronymus
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

What assumption about the fire have I made? Really, I have asserted nothing about it except that it may be different than the fire we know and I gave a reason - from Scripture's description of Hellfire - why I am justified in thinking this. At least in its unquenchable-ness, we know Hellfire is different from normal fire. I don't, see, then, that it does make more sense to think of it the way you are.


The apostle John makes an unqualified statement about the unquenchable nature of Hellfire. He doesn't liken it to anything as you do here, lessening the meaning of his description in doing so. The fire is unquenchable. Period. And John reinforces this reading in his description of the flaming torment of Hell in Revelation:

Revelation 14:9-11
9 Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand,
10 he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
11 And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night
, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name."


Well, this is describing the final end for the wicked whereby they will be destroyed in the Lake of Fire. It is not talking about hell here.

What you claim is not in evidence in the passage. You're reading your ideas into the passage in order to make it conform to them. It seems very plain to me that Hell, as in the fiery place of eternal torment (as opposed to its other referents: Sheol, Hades, etc.), is, in the end, the Lake of Fire. And in it the wicked will suffer unending punishment, tormented by Hellfire (hence the wailing and gnashing of teeth) but never consumed by it.

Selah.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Gabriel Anton
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If you don't like dueling passages then why did you post this passage. I have plainly made the case from Gen 2:7. If you see nothing in Genesis that contradicts 1 Thessalonians then what is your argument and why then did you post the verse?
wow, I didn't post the passage in place of yours but in conjunction with yours...I'm sure if you try you can understand the difference between reconciling all passages into one understanding and playing dueling passages that take extremes as truth.
I've shown several times from Gen 2:7 that God created man from the dust of the earth.
I so badly want to say duh, but I have been told that is inflammatory to some of the sensitive people on these boards. Yes, God formed man from the dust of the earth...nothing contradictory there unless of course you want to read into it what is not there. Now, look at the passage I presented that enhances this understanding...you see, according to the totality of scripture man is flesh (dust) spirit (life) and soul (eternal) The spirit and soul of man so tightly connected that only scripture is able to truly separate them (well the word of God). that is a pretty tight connection and would inform our understanding of Gen. as to the intent of God on the matter. Which is exactly what you have been shown many times over now. You see, if only God can separate the soul of man from the spirit of man, then when Gen. says God breathed life into man it is more than likely referring to both the soul and spirit. To deny this is to say that the other passages that tell us man is flesh, spirit, and soul makes God out to be a liar. IOW's Gen. does NOT contradict what I have said nor the passage I presented however, you and your opinion have contradicted the totality of scripture. not a clue what you are trying to argue here. If man is three parts, body, soul, and spirit, then you are agreeing with me even though you insist you are disagreeing...which is very confusing to know what you are trying to say and since scripture tells us that God is not the author of confusion it would seem that Satan is somehow involved in this part of this discussion.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
God is God and can do anything He wants, but the question is, where in scripture does it say that God takes back the gift of life that He gave to man when He created them? I don't see that scripture....you can inflate that from various passages taken out of context but unless you do that, you simply can't make the case.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,686
7,908
...
✟1,323,209.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I am sorry, my friend. It just appears like you are basically shaking your head in disagreement with your words in your reply here and you are not really giving me any solid reason in Scripture how your interpretation is superior over mine. I am confident in my view of these verses because of the other verses I have already showed you. There is no other way to interpret Revelation 6:9-10, Luke 16:9-31, Matthew 17:1-13, Luke 23:43 (among other verses listed) that support the belief that "people will be conscious after they die" without twisting them beyond what they actually say. The only verse that I am taking off that list (see link below) is Jonah 2:2 (Because I now believe Jonah did not die and go to Sheol based on my re-reading the chapter, praying, and by looking at many articles on discussing the topic).

Previous list given of:
Verses on being conscious after death


...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You two can hash this out but let me remind you that upon salvation we die to self or iow's put on the new man. the new man has new thoughts, iow's the sinful thoughts and desires are replaced with Godly thoughts and desires. this is a scriptural basic. As such it is totally reasonable and consistent with the totality of scripture to say that our thoughts will "change" that we will no longer be concerned with the things of this earth and the sensual desires that hold us prisoner. IOW's a clarity of thought about the eternal...about God...a new understanding so to speak. So, if we are allowing the totality of scripture to define for us what hell is, you are wrong to assume that means no consciousness...carry on...
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
"This is something you're reading into the passage entirely. No where does Scripture even hint that the Lake of Fire has any role to play in the fiery consumption of the present heavens and Earth. This is a connection formed only in your imagination.

“But the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night; in the which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.” (2 Peter 3:10).

2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Rev_20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."

Neither of these passages indicate what you've asserted: that the present heavens and earth will be destroyed in the Lake of Fire. You must read this idea into these passages. It is a non sequitur to assert that because the heavens and earth will be consumed by fire it must be in the Lake of Fire that this is accomplished. This is akin to thinking that because you and I both have noses we are, therefore, the same person. This one similarity between us does not necessarily make us synonymous. In the same way, it is unreasonable to think that the fire mentioned in 2Peter 3:7 and 10 is the very same fire spoken of in Revelation 20:15.


Then you need to read the Parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man. He was in torment in flames immediately after he died. The wicked of Sodom and Gomorrah may not yet be in the actual Lake of Fire, but they are, like the Rich Man, in fiery torment nonetheless.

Selah.
 
Reactions: Gabriel Anton
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Whatever. I still do not understand the unquenchable need some people have to have people being tormented forever.
I can't figure out why some of you all think that it is our choice if hell is eternal or not...isn't truth defined by God and not our opinions and hopes?
 
Reactions: Gabriel Anton
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You realize it's possible that you and everyone you ever loved may go there, right? So you think you're all getting what you deserve? And if you really think everyone gets what they deserve.......yikes.
let me lay an uncomfortable truth on you...I am so in Love with the glimpse of God that I have been granted that I would gladly go to hell if only for a moment with my Lord. IOW's where I know I will not be in hell and I know that hell is torment forever and ever, God is so much more that there is nothing that can compare to being in His presence. If it took hell to serve my Lord and King, so be it, He is absolutely worthy.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What scripture says that the soul requires the spirit to live? Scripture says that scripture is sharp enough to separate the two but nothing about them requiring one another to exist....if they can be separated, it would seem probable that they can exist separate or I would assume there would be a scripture that would tell us otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,261
1,768
The land of OZ
✟345,480.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I'm going to have to take their side on this Butch.

GEN 1:26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness;

So do you believe that God is a living soul with a dirt body for His Spirit to live in? If not then how do you 'unpack' this verse theologically?
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

The whole point of this has been doctrinal for me, God's faithfulness was never in question. When it comes to rightly dividing the word there is a process to that for me and I have found one verse the tells us they will be tormented day and night forever. Everything else is ambiquise and the Old Testament Sheol is synonymous with death and the grace. Eliminating poetic expressions you have nothing in the Old Testament close to the concept of hell in the New Testament. Nothing will get you annihilation from a strict exposition of the texts but by and large it still has considerable merit.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
actually there are several passages, but as I have said before, there is much about hell we do not know, those things we need to accept by faith. It is what we do know that we should be discussing here not all the inferences that are happening. At least if we want to know what God intends for us to know.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
As promised, my conclusions. Do note this doesn't include words like Hades and Tartars so it's anything but exhaustive:


Totally disagree - it does not work at all in the majority of the proof texts. Please prove that it does.


While I studied this I noticed something about the word for Hell in the New Testament, at least twice it's used in connection with conversation:

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is so set among our members that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire by hell. (James 3:6)
There nothing wrong with taking an apologetic stand but calling your brother a fool, or treating him like one because you disagree is more dangerous then you know. Vine's has an excellent exposition on the word for Hell, thought I would share it:

He who says to his brother, Thou fool (see under FOOL), will be in danger of "the hell of fire," Mat 5:22; it is better to pluck out (a metaphorical description of irrevocable law) an eye that causes its possessor to stumble, than that his "whole body be cast into hell," Mat 5:29; similarly with the hand, Mat 5:30; in Mat 18:8, 9, the admonitions are repeated, with an additional mention of the foot; here, too, the warning concerns the person himself (for which obviously the "body" stands in chapt. 5); in ver. 8, "the eternal fire" is mentioned as the doom, the character of the region standing for the region itself, the two being combined in the phrase "the hell of fire," ver. 9. To the passage in Matt. 18, that in Mar 9:43-47, is parallel; here to the word "hell" are applied the extended descriptions "the unquenchable fire" and "where their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched." (Vines Dictionary)
Hell as we understand it in the Old Testament is virtually unknown. The word for Hell, γέεννα (geenna), is introduced by the Lord during the Sermon on the Mount. It is used 12 times in the New Testament, 11 times in the synoptic gospels by the Lord himself. The word is actually the name for a valley where the children of Israel used to toss their infant children as a sacrifice to Molech, the practice was known as making your children pass through the fire.

Hell is the place of the future punishment called "Gehenna" or "Gehenna of fire". This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their future destruction. (Outline of Biblical Usuage)
There are other passages that describe Hell:

  • "and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth. (Matt 13:42)
  • "And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life." (Mat 25:46)
  • These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, (1Th. 1:9)
  • But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul. Heb. 10:39
  • These are wells without water, clouds* carried by a tempest, for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever. (2Pet. 2:17)
  • raging waves of the sea, foaming up their own shame; wandering stars for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever. (Jude 1:13)
  • He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death." (Rev. 2:11)
  • Then the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who worked signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image. These two were cast alive into the lake of fire burning with brimstone. (Rev. 19:20)
  • The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where* the beast and the false prophet [are]. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. (Rev. 20:10)
  • Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death (Rev 20:14)
  • "But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death." (Rev. 21:8)
Notice Rev. 20:10 says they will be tormented forever. Other places the fire is said to burn forever but the appears to be the only place that insists that they are tormented forever, at least in my estimation. I don't see much to argue about here, annihilation is one way of reading the texts in question that one proof text not withstanding. For me the one thing that was intriguing about the subject matter was the connection to Sheol, it's synonymous with the grave. There is one reference that resembles the New Testament concept of Hell, and it's in the Law :

For a fire is kindled in My anger, And shall burn to the lowest hell;
It shall consume the earth with her increase,
And set on fire the foundations of the mountains. (Deu 32:22)
It is translated Hell other places in the Old Testament as well:

2 Sam 22:6, Job 11:8, Job 26:6, Psa 9:17, Psa 16:10, Psa 18:5, Psa 55:15, Psa 86:13, Psa 116:3, Psa 139:8, Prov 5:5, Prov 7:27, Prov 9:18, Prov 15:11, Prov 15:24, Prov 23:14, Prov 27:20, Isa 5:14, Isa 14:9, Isa 14:15, Isa 28:15, Isa 28:18, Isa 57:9, Eze 31:16, Eze 31:17, Eze 32:21, Eze 32:27, Amos 9:2, Jonah 2:2, Hab 2:5
The rest are translated grave(s),

For I will go down into the grave H7585 unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him. (Gen 37:35; 42:38; Gen. 44:29,31)

1 Sam 2:6, 1 Ki 2:6, 1 Ki 2:9, Job 7:9, Job 14:13, Job 17:13, Job 21:13, Job 24:19, Psa 6:5, Psa 30:3, Psa 31:17, Psa 49:14, Psa 49:14, Psa 49:15, Psa 88:3, Psa 89:48, Prov 1:12, Prov 30:16, Eccl 9:10, S of Solomon 8:6, Isa 14:11, Isa 38:10, Isa 38:18, Eze 31:15, Hos 13:14, Hos 13:14 Psa 141:7
The traditional understanding of Hell stands up well under close scrutiny, the children of perdition will be utterly destroyed in Hell but the term Jesus uses isn't a complete destruction as if being burned to ashes:

G622 - (apollymi ἀπόλλυμι) Destroy, Destroyer, Destruction, Destructive:
a strengthened form of ollumi, signifies "to destroy utterly;" in Middle Voice, "to perish." The idea is not extinction but ruin, loss, not of being, but of well-being. (Vine's)​

The doctrine of Hell involves final judgment, the fate of the children and their condition in eternity isn't the point of the doctrine. Ultimately it's a warning of how to escape Hell through the person and work of Christ. Splitting semantic hairs seems a tedious task for Christians interested in working in doctrine. We certainly have no call to be divisive and argumentative over the issue. I had never encountered the concept of annihilation, although I rejected soul sleep years ago as being strictly non-biblical and still do. Here I decided to explore the concept of annihilation and while it has it's merits it fails to pass the acid test of Scripture with one verse, which makes it dubious at best.

Other then that I think it's been a fascinating and productive discussion, many thanks to the posters for their contribution. It was very engaging.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You presented both sides of the argument, showed reconciliation of all passages, all in all, well done...I couple of minor issues but nothing that would make any difference....
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

Well thanks, I spent more time on Sheol then I expected but all in all a worthwhile study. I had just never heard of this before, after studying it out I have to wonder why not.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Upvote 0