Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I, as an atheist, fully support your right to worship as you please, and your right to voice those beliefs in the public square.
What I don't support is using government resources to evangelize for your religion.
Can you understand the difference between the two?
So you agree that belief is not a fully conscious choice then?
No... Wanting churches not to be tax exempt and not allowing secular public schools to favor any religion is not an attempt to quash religion
That's an awfully broad brush you are painting with!We don't have religious totalitarianism in the Western world, the secular revolt rightly diminished the power of the church. But that wasn't enough for the secularist, now they want to quash religion from society altogether.
I disagree on taxing charitable donations of any kind.
I agree that creationism has no place in secular schools nor the Atheist agenda.
I have an agenda now? Dang it I have got to stop missing the EAC and kitten BBQ meetings.
You are supposed to bring the Deviled eggs to the next meeting, btw.
I disagree on taxing charitable donations of any kind.
I agree that creationism has no place in secular schools nor the Atheist agenda.
Figures. Do you know what devil embryos are going for on the open market these days?
It is not just charitable contributions that are not taxed. The Church pays no property tax.
I'm actually OK on that for the Church proper.
I'm not OK with it for Church based businesses.
I'm torn when it comes to school or daycare that are associated with a Church.
When I said the Church is not taxed on property I meant for the Church proper. On other things it varies. I think now in most states the Tax code more or less reflects my feelings.
As long as churches don't run a large profit from year to year and stay out of political campaigning/fundraising, I am fine with tax-free status for churches.
Me too. I see the tax-free status as an effort to allow small, charitable churches form the core of religious community life. It would be damaging to these communities if churches had to close down due to being taxed.
eudaimonia,
Mark
I think you demands for proof is a cop out.
A cop out for what? You're the one who refuses to even acknowledge the burden of proof, presuming yourself to be exempt from it. That's a cop out.
* I have acknowledged in several posts that we religionists can't prove the existence of a subjective spiritual experience using the scientific meathead.
Colter said:I have acknowledged in several posts that we religionists can't prove the existence of a subjective spiritual experience using the scientific meathead.
And I have explained to you numerous times at this point that you don't just get to stop there. Your next step is to provide an means by which 'spiritual' truth may be gleaned, without stealing any groundwork from science, which you've categorically written off.
I DO NOT want you to attempt to use science to demonstrate your assertions about 'spiritual' truths. You have explicitly bereaved yourself of that privilege.
You're making it sound like it's a set process, almost scientific, that we gain spiritual truth. Not so, my friend. Just as a man cannot tell a woman, "By what scientific process may I be able to methodically win your love?" Sounds ridiculous, but it's along the same basis as what you're asking for.
Now you're setting the rules by which a person can even explain something to you. Besides, I thought atheists were all about scientific methods for explaining everything.
Once again...
I am already aware that you cannot demonstrate your assertions scientifically. You have categorically written off science as a means for gleaning 'spiritual' truth.
Once again...
You don't just get to stop there and expect to be taken seriously. Your next step is to provide a means by which 'spiritual' truth can be reliably gleaned, without stealing any groundwork from science.
Barring that, your epistemologically vacuous naked assertions can and will be dismissed out of hand.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?