Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Nope, you at best do not understand the prophecy. Nebuchadnezzar failed at.his attempt. The Bible even admits it. The prophecy was about the King of Tyre and Nebuchadnezzar.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope, you at best do not understand the prophecy. Nebuchadnezzar failed at.his attempt. The Bible even admits it. The prophecy was about the King of Tyre and Nebuchadnezzar.The Tyre prophecy was fulfilled and stands to this day.
Nope, you at best do not understand the prophecy. Nebuchadnezzar failed at.his attempt. The Bible even admits it. The prophecy was about the King of Tyre and Nebuchadnezzar.
The Tyre prophecy was fulfilled and stands to this day.
Thats why it failed, it still stood, the bible even acknowledged it didn't fall.
The Tyre prophecy was not about Alexander the Great. You should look up the history of Tyre. It was regularly attacked both before and after Nebuchadnezzar. Sometimes it won, sometimes it lost. The prophecy was about Nebby, not Alex. Nebby was a "king of kings" in the Old Testament He was the "many kings" that was to attack Tyre. He failed.The bible doesn't record the fulfillment of all prophecy contained within it (see Genesis 49). Fortunately for my argument secular history records the destruction of Tyre by Alexander the Great in 332 B.C.
The Tyre prophecy was not about Alexander the Great. You should look up the history of Tyre. It was regularly attacked both before and after Nebuchadnezzar. Sometimes it won, sometimes it lost. The prophecy was about Nebby, not Alex. Nebby was a "king of kings" in the Old Testament He was the "many kings" that was to attack Tyre. He failed.
The problem with extending a prophecy to far is that one degrades all prophecy. Sooner or later Tyre was sure to fall. It had quite a period without falling and that did end with Alex, but he was outside the original prophecy. You are in effect calling me a biblical prophet when I predict that "You will see a red car" the next time that you go out.
I have seen Christians rightfully deny the failed prophecies of other religions when they do not meet their clear goal. Yet many of those cannot do the same when the Bible is involved.
Sorry, I don't read sources that are essentially "liars for Jesus". Make your own claims if you wish to. At least you might have the excuse of no knowing better.Lots of clarification if you look for it. Check out he and they in this link regarding Nebuchadnezzar.
Tyre in Prophecy
Sorry, I don't read sources that are essentially "liars for Jesus". Make your own claims if you wish to. At least you might have the excuse of no knowing better.
Actually they do. Do you want to go over them in more depth? The Tyre prophecy was about Nebby. If you want to extend it beyond that the burden of proof is upon you. The context is clear if you read the story.Your argument doesn't have the biblical support that you claim.
Why do you even read the bible?
I can say very similar things about Star Trek.
Star Trek confirms the historical background (it references many real world places and people), it has information about science, it has correctly predicted many things (including correctly predicting that Apollo 11 would be launched on a Wednesday!). It even references itself, since the Enterprise in Star Trek's "history" was named after the space shuttle, which was named after the spaceship in Star Trek!
And yet we don't consider that Star Trek is divinely inspired.
As long as satan is free, evolution will be believed along with other scientific lies.
Seriously, he would not have. It appears that you did not understand the analogy. What part confused you?Spock would say that your Star Trek analogy is illogical.
Not sue how favorably God looks upon modern medicine, many of the medicine methods cause more problems than they heal. I guess the major contribution modern medicine has been, is the diagnostic ability.
I know this it will not be modern medicine that is used by people on the new earth. To me that modern medicine goes with this fallen state of the earth now, it has its bad and also good points. Kinda matches the fallen state of man some truth mixed in with untruth.
Really in many cases modern medicine extends the life, so a person can suffer just a little longer.
Do you then believe Noah was scientist he built a boat.
So to you agriculture, warfare, boat building, medicine are the same as a person saying 50 million years ago this and this did this, that brought about this, which in turn brought about this. And we know this because a scientist says so because he looked at a fossil or a rock and the fossil/rock told him so.
The science that glorifies man through lies, example man on the moon this lie glorifies man and basically, except for a few, the whole world was taken in by this lie.What on earth has satan to do with science?
That would be offensive if it wasn't so amusing. I think I'll trawl through some of your other posts on the forum, looking for similar gems. Thanks for the smile.The science that glorifies man through lies, example man on the moon this lie glorifies man and basically, except for a few, the whole world was taken in by this lie.
What on earth has satan to do with science?
Satan created science in the garden.
Hahahaha.. Thousands of years ago snake cults proliferated in Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Levant, Arabia and the Indus Valley. The snake was a symbol of wisdom, fertility, and rebirth.
I think you have a case of dueling religions casting the snake as Satan.. I don't think Jews do that.. and Genesis was their scripture.
In Numbers 21:4-9, Moses makes a bronze serpent on a stick to heal the Hebrews' snake bites, as per God's instructions. They don't worship it, but they are to look at it in order to live.
Curious bit of a story.
Spock would say that your Star Trek analogy is illogical.
On what grounds? I used the same reasoning that you did in post 806. If my argument is illogical, then so is yours.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?