• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

H

HoneyDew

Guest
PaleHorse said:
I was merely making your post grammatically correct. The inclusion of the brackets, as SassySDA rightfully noted, is a literary tool commonly used to denote such a correction or clarification. As such, the meaning of your post was not altered one iota.

If that works for ya!! I say this only to prevent the fine art of English usage from being destroyed -- you did not. Too bad you left "and" in, because then your claim to making things grammatically correct might have worked. You know it and I know it. Claiming otherwise is might work for others but, hey ... ;)
:wave:
It is there as a witness. Nothing more that I want to say.
Peace and enjoy your fellowship, all.
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
TrustandObey: That was the clearest, tightest and most water-proof sermonette I have heard all day. It was a joy to read...a tour of your heart! Gracias!

Cliff: Mate; you said a mouthful! No one can fully fathom God's character or actions without knowledge of the Sanctuary. Not just the aspect of types and anti-types....there is much more than that!

"I will meditate also on all Thy work, and talk of Thy doings. Thy Way, O God, in the Sanctuary! Who [is so] great a god as God?" Psalms 77:12,13

I think this is Atonement application "work", not creation work that David is praising!
 
Upvote 0

PaleHorse

Veteran
Jun 1, 2005
1,405
32
56
Arkansas
Visit site
✟24,359.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
HoneyDew said:
If that works for ya!! I say this only to prevent the fine art of English usage from being destroyed -- you did not. Too bad you left "and" in, because then your claim to making things grammatically correct might have worked. You know it and I know it. Claiming otherwise is might work for others but, hey ... ;)
:wave:
It is there as a witness. Nothing more that I want to say.
Peace and enjoy your fellowship, all.
It does work for me, thanks. :)

Have a great day, Princess.
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I have talked with folks that have met the CSDA families.
They fall within the pockets of what I have studied for years (and published) about offshoots and the psychology of organized efforts of human-driven reformations.

Those with purely theological differences who are actually born again never seek to destroy other's walk with Christ.
They never attempt to teardown what God has built up.I have had warm realtionships with many of these sorts of godly and active Adventist christians.

Dissatisfaction with Adventism is caused by many factors.
I can focus on one type:

Those that have a "seed in rocky soil" experience. Notice what the SOP points out as the causes and the results of a self-centred, hyper-sensitive religious life:


"It is those who are not engaged in this unselfish labor who have a sickly experience, and become worn out with struggling, doubting, murmuring, sinning, and repenting, until they lose all sense as to what constitutes genuine religion.
They feel that they cannot go back to the world, and so they hang on the skirts of Zion, having petty jealousies, envyings, disappointments, and remorse.
They are full of fault finding, and feed upon the mistakes and errors of their brethren. They have only a hopeless, faithless, sunless experience in their religious life.
"
--Review and Herald, Sept. 2, 1890.
 
Upvote 0

SassySDA

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2005
926
19
70
OH
✟1,169.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
"It is those who are not engaged in this unselfish labor who have a sickly experience, and become worn out with struggling, doubting, murmuring, sinning, and repenting, until they lose all sense as to what constitutes genuine religion.
They feel that they cannot go back to the world, and so they hang on the skirts of Zion, having petty jealousies, envyings, disappointments, and remorse.
They are full of fault finding, and feed upon the mistakes and errors of their brethren. They have only a hopeless, faithless, sunless experience in their religious life.
"
--Review and Herald, Sept. 2, 1890.

Wow, that pretty much describes it.
 
Upvote 0

rnmomof7

Legend
Feb 9, 2002
14,503
735
Western NY
✟94,487.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Mod Hat.


The purpose of starting the different forums was to eliminate debate between the traditional SDA and others.

All debate will be removed from this thread as well as any responses to it.

I will remind all members not to debate a post that you report.

Lets have some peace here guys
 
Upvote 0

SassySDA

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2005
926
19
70
OH
✟1,169.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
TrustAndObey said:
I couldn't agree more! I see so many people claiming to be Adventist with what they consider "new light". The problem is that most of them are trying to cram that new light down other people's throats. The crazy part is, their new light is generally something other churches already hold in great esteem.

I'll be perfectly honest, I find most of it to be a HUGE distraction from the big picture. It's a stumbling block.

For instance, a poster from here posted something in another forum about what "Progressive" Adventists believe and it sounded like a completely different church than the Adventist church.

Regardless of one's beliefs and what "umbrella" they try to squeeze under if they answer a "What do Adventists believe about...." question without clarifying that they do not hold the fundamental belief of Adventists, they are bearing false witness in my opinion. At the very least they should preface their answer with "I'm not a Fundamental Adventist, but here's what *I* believe........." Put their own necks on the chopping block instead of confusing people about what the Adventist church teaches and believes.

If a person knows their views differ from what the mainstream church teaches, then they really are bearing false witness if they try to conceal that fact, and they have to answer to the Maker for that some day. And frankly, some of these "new" ideas are a little frightening (like not holding to the literal 7-day week of creation) and it does upset me when people claiming to be Adventist have decided to go with the majority on that subject............

I used to go to a lot of chatrooms and there were people in there that I knew were Fundamental Belief Adventists that had a completely different view of the trinity than I do.....that didn't make them any less of an Adventist than I am, that's for sure. We still had the same fundamental beliefs, we just differed on what they meant to us personally. Our fundamental beliefs list our doctrine of the trinity in a very vague way, so there are times that subjects like that will be believed differently by different people. HOWEVER, the fundamental belief does not give way to some "out there" interpretation either.

For instance, if an Adventist started claiming that Jesus was satan's brother or something wacky like that, then they can not fit that under one of our beliefs, period. If they do, it's bearing false witness.

Back to my point.....these little discussions about the differences really are a distraction and a stumbling block. I see Traditional Adventists being accused of being "narrow-minded" or "afraid of change" all the time when the truth is, most of us joined the church knowing the doctrine and agreeing to it beforehand. I'm not afraid of change, never have been, and if I felt that other churches taught the Bible better than Adventist churches, I'd go to those churches, not try to change this one.

An online friend of mine went to an Adventist church for years, but recently switched to Messianic Judaism. She was of Jewish bloodline and decided along her learning path that she should keep the biblical feasts. That's not a belief held by the Adventist church, so she didn't want to be a hypocrite I guess.

Since then I was suprised to find out that most Messianics believe a person's "soul" goes to heaven or hell immediately upon death and I know this is something my friend disagrees with. In fact, she's one of the people that I talked to the most about the state of the dead because it was not what I had grown up being taught. She gave me great material to see the truth about what happens to us when we die. However, in order for her to find a church that taught what she liked about the feasts, she had to compromise a fundamental belief of hers and I think that's really sad.

I will say this about her, she never once misrepresented that the Adventist church believes in keeping the biblical feasts. She always prefaced answering a question about them with "*I* keep them, but..........."

Long story short, I think that when a person's fundamental beliefs differ greatly from the Adventist doctrine, they are bearing false witness to say their beliefs are the Adventist's beliefs.

I would like to remind everyone that this is a non-debate area and this forum was set up so that Traditional Adventists could discuss the stumbling blocks before us specifically. I think all of us in here know we have a lot of Work to do, like Vaudois pointed out, and we cannot let ourselves get distracted all the time. CF has features set up so that we can debate this in the bigger section if we so choose, or we can use the features to keep people from distracting us. I think we should use our time here wisely.

You're right about the debate and where it should be....but I gotta say...

THAT'S MY SIS!!
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Vaudois said:
I have talked with folks that have met the CSDA families.
They fall within the pockets of what I have studied for years (and published) about offshoots and the psychology of organized efforts of human-driven reformations.

Those with purely theological differences who are actually born again never seek to destroy other's walk with Christ.
They never attempt to teardown what God has built up.I have had warm realtionships with many of these sorts of godly and active Adventist christians.

Dissatisfaction with Adventism is caused by many factors.
I can focus on one type:

Those that have a "seed in rocky soil" experience. Notice what the SOP points out as the causes and the results of a self-centred, hyper-sensitive religious life:


"It is those who are not engaged in this unselfish labor who have a sickly experience, and become worn out with struggling, doubting, murmuring, sinning, and repenting, until they lose all sense as to what constitutes genuine religion.
They feel that they cannot go back to the world, and so they hang on the skirts of Zion, having petty jealousies, envyings, disappointments, and remorse.
They are full of fault finding, and feed upon the mistakes and errors of their brethren. They have only a hopeless, faithless, sunless experience in their religious life.
"
--Review and Herald, Sept. 2, 1890.

I just "knew" there was something special about this guy!!:) Vau--God has sent you to us here in this forum!! He knew how battle worn we were and we needed a rearward!!! Thank you for following His lead. God bless you Vaudois--I know the Spirit and peace of God is upon you!

Love and Blessings, Honor
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I'm glad to be here.
Forums are a blessing if Godward, a curse if used for the spewing of bile or soap-boxing for attention. We can be educated, comforted and encouraged to work for Christ by this means, and Satan knows it. He will continue to send unwitting souls, enflamed by emotional nagging wounds or deluded by high-minded "religious theories", so we must be attuned to the Spirit's warning bells. We need the "eyesalve" like never before.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,681
6,104
Visit site
✟1,045,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Vaudois said:
Oh, I see, Tall. I misunderstand you.Can you cut and paste some commentary notes, please, showing what you mean? I'd like to see that.
Lots of folks don't know it, but in the SDA Commentaries, anything under pages from about 1000 on down were Conference employees; from pp.1000 on up are generally EGW. Although Vol. 7-A is all her.

Right Cliff: the Sanctuary is the key target of Satan and all duped by him, whether knowingly, traditionally or intellectually. Mess with the truth of the Lord's Work in Heaven for us, and you mess with the whole Plan of Salvation, ultimately.

Yes, I should clarify, they were NOT in the section by EGW, but just some of the study notes. They made brief mention of some holding an alternate view.

In any case, I will have to hunt up the section of I get a chance. Incidentally, I wish they had the commentary online. It would make things easier.
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Yeah...it's availability is limited...but so are it's nuances in some areas to me.

What's so great about Traditional Adventism is that one can search all flavours of opinion by the uninspired-yet-scholarly and yet can keep a firm grip upon the Rock where He reveals His Hand upon the Pen of Inspiration.

This is not an inherited, educational, institutional or pride-soaked ability, this "grip", is but a present from the Hand of Jesus, wrapped in plain brown wrappings , handed gladly to you when asked for from the depths of a broken, searching heart.

But if the hands are full, His present is snubbed.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Having an alternate view is not a bad thing. Telling others they have to have it too...is. There's nothing wrong with sharing opinions but there's something very wrong when an individual insists their way is the "right way". You might as well drink some poisonous kool-aid and lay down if you fall for that stuff (IMO).

For instance, take the distraction of a very small group that bands together to appear there are great numbers of them.....it's a great show, but it's not reality. If you disagree with one of them, watch out, the whole lot comes out of the woodwork and will come after you. It's still not reality though, these groups are not attacking people in real life, and it's my opinion they never will. They'd rather hide behind a computer screen. (This is just a general statement, not aimed at anyone on this forum necessarily). I guess there's a growing trend that there is safety in numbers, even if the numbers really are very small.

Small or large, hostility used in any group trying to get others to adhere to their beliefs is just weird. It sends up red flags to me and it's my opinion it should make everyone go "why are they so insistant that I believe like they do?" I do see why some people fall for cult groups though, honestly, if they've never been taught/read the Bible and they just want acceptance or tranquility away from the rest of the world.

I'm rambling, sorry. Regardless, alternate views are usually a good thing and it doesn't bother me in the least when people express them. It's when they start pushing it on you in a hostile manner that you should freak out and start thinking to yourself "NO Jim Jones, I'll pass on the kool-aid this time, thanks" and then run like a track star.
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Ramble on, T&O, ramble on!

Actually I see these, and all other larger forms of "religious liberty haters" as the biblical mystery of iniquity. In other words anyone who imposes themselves as the connector between you and God, thus degrading Christ to some more minor role, is attempting to steal the True Connector's place.

Is this not why Satan could not abide in heaven; he stepped out of his place and desired Christ's? Is it not because Satan wish to be the Connector? He is not so dumb as to try to be the Father, in the angel's eyes; he wished to usurp Christ's position as the Link between God and creature, angels or humans.
 
Upvote 0

StormyOne

Senior Veteran
Aug 21, 2005
5,424
47
65
Alabama
✟5,866.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
TrustAndObey said:
For instance, take the distraction of a very small group that bands together to appear there are great numbers of them.....it's a great show, but it's not reality. If you disagree with one of them, watch out, the whole lot comes out of the woodwork and will come after you. It's still not reality though, these groups are not attacking people in real life, and it's my opinion they never will. They'd rather hide behind a computer screen. (This is just a general statement, not aimed at anyone on this forum necessarily). I guess there's a growing trend that there is safety in numbers, even if the numbers really are very small.

Small or large, hostility used in any group trying to get others to adhere to their beliefs is just weird. It sends up red flags to me and it's my opinion it should make everyone go "why are they so insistant that I believe like they do?" I do see why some people fall for cult groups though, honestly, if they've never been taught/read the Bible and they just want acceptance or tranquility away from the rest of the world.
I agree totally, especially those groups who insist that you adhere to every one of their beliefs or you cannot be a part of their group, or say that you are a part of their group.... There was a big fallout in one of the car clubs I happened to be a part of, some of the members felt that everyone who owned this particular car should restore it to look just like it did when it was new... other members felt it was okay to modify the engine, or the wheels, or the paint, it would still be recognized as a legendary car... The members who did not like the modified cars begin to say that those who modified their cars were not true car club members because of those modifications.... it was a complete and utter mess...... they also argued if they should wear their club T-shirts when cruising so they could be identified as a group... again some thought they should, and others said that it wasn't important that they all look the same.... that was a wild group....
 
Upvote 0
Aug 20, 2005
1,205
28
52
Arkansas, USA
✟24,012.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I say if you belong to a group, belong to the group/organization and adhere to all the beliefs. If you have problems with one or more of there beliefs, leave and dont be a part of it anylonger. If you want to start a new group fine, but use a different name, because you are no longer part of the other group. Completely seperate yourself.

Just makes sense to me!
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Actually, Happywiththe Lord, it's a bit more involved than that.

Let's look at what separation actually is.

The Apostles separated from the Jewish System. The Waldensians separted from Rome. Luther separted from Rome. Wesley separated from the Church of England. EGW's family separated from the Methodists.

So on the surface separation can be a good move.
Leaving Egypt was a good move for the Hebrews. Leaving Babylon was as well. God's listening people followed Him out. Prince Moses, the military man, had to tend sheep for a long time to grasp that!

It is an eternal principle that it does not matter so much where you are, but what you are. That you are separated is a "where" ="not in that fold anymore".

The fundamental question is "Why? Why are you not there? Who caused the removal, yourself or God? Who dictates your action; yourself or the Holy Spirit? What are you; obedient servant to God, or self-appointed Elijah, servant of your emotion or ideas?"

The Apostles, Waldensians, Wesley, EGW...they all had messages for the Church that they were in. They were directly moved by God, not "pushing for their rights", angry at their peers, prodden by injustices (real or imaginary) done to them. They had Light from God directly; they were ordered by Him to stay put and reveal to their brothers that Light. They did.

Then they were rejected by those that loved tradition and power instead. They were forced out, never walked out.

Now, today, there are folks that make themselves such awful pests and unchristian pains in the necks that others toss them out. They would be tossed out of a sewing circle or biker's rally!!

But this is self-fulfilling martyrdom, not God directed Light-bearing. This is self-justification, another log on the fire that lights up "ME".

There is no history of God's people successfully using Satan's or self-centered methods to build God's Kingdom.
God's ways are not a religious man's ways; they are a Spiritual man's ways because he loves God's ways.

See the differences?


 
Upvote 0
Aug 20, 2005
1,205
28
52
Arkansas, USA
✟24,012.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah, i see what you are saying. What i was meaning is simple (to me that is), that is you dont agree with the doctrine/"rules" then seperate yourself from the group and not refer to yourself as that. Example, if i was a member of the KKK (just a group off the top of my head, please dont read anything into the group i picked) and i didnt agree with there methods of carrying things out or what some of there beliefs were, i would no longer be a member and i would leave the group, and not be called one of them. That is what i was meaning. :)
 
Upvote 0

Vaudois

Active Member
Oct 5, 2005
190
4
72
✟335.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I also see what you mean; I do see the clear logic of your posts.

Yet, perhaps I wasn't clear.

Switching horses is not what godly seperation is about. Sure; one can just up and leave for personal reasons, but how often has God had to work long and hard with souls to come back to where He had them, before they moved out on their own steam?


Yes, I see no call for "leavers" to "steal our name"...but I am digging down deeper....looking at the spiritual roots.
 
Upvote 0