The Consequences of Creationism

[john crawford]

Evolution deos not oppose religion, it's seperate and a person can both believe in god and the neo-darwinist theory of evolution.

That's called theistic neo-Darwinism and religious or Christian evolution.

 

[TheBear]

That's called theistic neo-Darwinism and religious or Christian evolution.

Source?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Source?

Himself, as always.

 

[john crawford]

But you refered to the chart as an authority, to support your claims. It's pretty disengenuous of you to pick parts that may support your claims, and disparage the other parts which don't.

No, I referred to the chart as "evidence" of neo-Darwinist racial prejudice and bias. The part on the lower right is also an example of neo-Darwinist racial bigotry.

http://www.jay-matternes.com/Ho09.html

http://www.gurche.com/main_frameset.htm

http://home.hetnet.nl/%7Ealad/page27.html

http://www.jay-matternes.com/Ho30.html

 

[monkey88]

An evolutionists goal in studying evolution is not to prove there is no god. In no paper does it say anything like it. The goal is to understand life and how it can benefit humanity. Some people seem to see evolution as an attack on religion, it's not, it's science like the science that means most of us don't get the mumps, polio, small pox etc.

 

[john crawford]

Some people seem to see evolution as an attack on religion, it's not, it's science like the science that means most of us don't get the mumps, polio, small pox etc.

It is not very scientific to claim that humans originated from apes in Africa without offering any testable or demonstrable evidence in support of the claim. Without scientific evidence to demonstrate human evolution in Africa, such claims are basically religious opinions and beliefs, not scientific theories at all.