Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nobody thought it was a moral thing to have done and he was impeached for it. But he evidently did not break any state laws in doing so, at least not that anybody could find out about.The double standard in a nutshell
x.com
Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question
PIERS MORGAN: “Why is Bill Clinton able to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he’s President and lie to the American people about it on national television? And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he’s President, and he has no criminal court recourse for that? Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “I don’t think anyone is making that case, Piers.”
PIERS MORGAN: “No, I’m asking you, what’s the difference? What’s the difference?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “The difference is that he didn’t cook the books financially using his own, like using back channels in order to pay.”
PIERS MORGAN: “So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying her nearly a million dollars while you’re the President of the United States and then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it, that’s fine because he’s a Democrat?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “Only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.”
PIERS MORGAN: “Sorry?”
hope you can see the video..
I mean it looks like Piers’ argument falls apart right there. Clinton (who btw isn’t running or even qualified to be president anymore, while Trump is) didn’t have to defraud the State of New York to coverup his affair.The double standard in a nutshell
x.com
Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question
PIERS MORGAN: “Why is Bill Clinton able to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he’s President and lie to the American people about it on national television? And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he’s President, and he has no criminal court recourse for that? Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “I don’t think anyone is making that case, Piers.”
PIERS MORGAN: “No, I’m asking you, what’s the difference? What’s the difference?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “The difference is that he didn’t cook the books financially using his own, like using back channels in order to pay.”
PIERS MORGAN: “So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying her nearly a million dollars while you’re the President of the United States and then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it, that’s fine because he’s a Democrat?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “Only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.”
PIERS MORGAN: “Sorry?”
hope you can see the video..
And a few years later, John Edwards was convicted of campaign finance violations for paying off a mistress.I mean it looks like Piers’ argument falls apart right there. Clinton (who btw isn’t running or even qualified to be president anymore, while Trump is) didn’t have to defraud the State of New York to coverup his affair.
I am still trying to find out what Law Trump BrokeNobody thought it was a moral thing to have done and he was impeached for it. But he evidently did not break any state laws in doing so, at least not that anybody could find out about.
um, Clinton was a sitting president.. And you mean he did not pay that girl off so he could stay in office.I mean it looks like Piers’ argument falls apart right there. Clinton (who btw isn’t running or even qualified to be president anymore, while Trump is) didn’t have to defraud the State of New York to coverup his affair.
by the way, the statute of limitations for the state law had expired.. So even if trump was guilty (Which I still do not see any proof he was) it does not matterNobody thought it was a moral thing to have done and he was impeached for it. But he evidently did not break any state laws in doing so, at least not that anybody could find out about.
I thought he was impeached for lyingNobody thought it was a moral thing to have done and he was impeached for it. But he evidently did not break any state laws in doing so, at least not that anybody could find out about.
I am still trying to find out what Law Trump Broke
Where are the separate acts of business fraud in furtherance of Clinton’s coverup? That’s what Trump has been charge with. Not paying off his mistress. That’s not against the law. Business fraud is against the law. That’s what Trump did that Clinton didn’t do.um, Clinton was a sitting president.. And you mean he did not pay that girl off so he could stay in office.
please.. lets be real here..
I am still trying to find out what Law Trump Broke
Clinton did not do this.This same question has been asked and answered dozens of times. He was charged with 34 counts of
Falsifying Business Documents
Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question
Slap a deceptive headline on there and pretend someone was owned.
Everybody (falsifies business documents.)* You're just going after Trump because he is trying to lead this country closer to God.Clinton did not do this.
You've been specifically explained in multiple threads. At this point you're just trolling.I am still trying to find out what Law Trump Broke
Whoever did his finances, used a pul down menu on the software they were using, and picked the one which said expense paid to his lawyer for his lawyers work.
1. Thats what it was
2. There is no proof trump did this, and not someone else
3. its not a crime, it actually fit exactly what trump paid the liar who again lied on stand, to do.
so again
Why is clinton ok with doing it, But trump a whole different standard.
Re:
A. Judge Merchan made a twenty dollar donation several years ago, and an ethics committee determined that as insignificant before the trial. Twenty bucks.
B. When a defendant has million dollar lawyers filing dozens of postponements, it's not so easy.
How is that crumbling? Those quotes from Fiorentini seem like reasonable responses to me.The double standard in a nutshell
x.com
Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question
PIERS MORGAN: “Why is Bill Clinton able to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he’s President and lie to the American people about it on national television? And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he’s President, and he has no criminal court recourse for that? Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “I don’t think anyone is making that case, Piers.”
PIERS MORGAN: “No, I’m asking you, what’s the difference? What’s the difference?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “The difference is that he didn’t cook the books financially using his own, like using back channels in order to pay.”
PIERS MORGAN: “So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying her nearly a million dollars while you’re the President of the United States and then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it, that’s fine because he’s a Democrat?”
FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “Only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.”
PIERS MORGAN: “Sorry?”
hope you can see the video..
And yet he is still ahead in the polls, received 200 million in contributions since the conviction, and even Democrats are saying lawfare was the wrong approach. People are siding with Trump.Listen hard. Not one says he didn't do the acts for which he was convicted.
Instead, they say:
He shouldn't have been charged.
The crimes were committed too long ago (2016).
He has not been convicted of federal election fraud. Not yet!
They quibble about NY state law.
They say the trial should have been in Staten Island.
But not one says, "He never did those things."
And let's face it, those things were 110% immoral and unethical.
And yet he is still ahead in the polls, received 200 million in contributions since the conviction, and even Democrats are saying lawfare was the wrong approach. People are siding with Trump.
Don't you wonder why?
Somebody had to pick up that torch.And when did Democrats start caring about "immoral and unethical?"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?