The common thread in Trump's defenders

[rambot]

It seems this was a professional online troll. Newsmax apparently fell for this, a true hoax haha.

Newsmax Touts Dubious Trump Trial Facebook Post: ‘This Needs to Be a Mistrial Immediately’

A Newsmax host and guest credulously accepted as fact a random Facebook comment purporting to be the cousin of a juror in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial.

www.mediaite.com

No! It's not a hoax .

You need to know how deep this goes.

 

[iluvatar5150]

"Violation of FEDERAL campaign finance limits" = federal offens tried in a federal court.

He wasn’t charged with federal crimes. He was charged with a state crime done in the pursuit of other (in some cases, federal) crimes.

Plus, no evidence was presented in the hearings to suggest that Trump actually did such.

Oh? You know what evidence was presented but not what he was charged with?

“tax fraud.[a"

Yes, I noticed you forgot to delete the "[a" from the copy/paste you used from your unidentified source.

My “unidentified source” was the wikipedia link I provided in post #142. You’d have known that if you’d read it.

But again. Show me what evidence was presented that demonstrates Trump was hiding "tax fraud," and I will show you that this was a mistral that should have been done in FEDERAL COURT!

How are you going to show anything when don’t understand the basics of the case and don’t read anything that’s provided to you?

 

[Zaha Torte]

Why would the judge send these letters without verifying the post?

 

[Fantine]

Why would the judge send these letters without verifying the post?

Because he is being especially careful to avoid any problems on appeal. Complete transparency.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

literally what an nda is

Thank you for clarifying the obvious. Perhaps you should apply to become a Biden handler/speech writer. You have talent and what it takes.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

I agree a kangaroo court. I agree also on libs. I would like to see this case finally get to court of justice. So people who are confused can know what happened here. And some people taken out of that system, that are corrupt..

Well, if Trump keeps his promise by being a "dictator on the first day," he would be aggressively kicking out the corruption without hesitation as if he was staring on "The Apprentice!" You're Fired! But alas, that is what the liberal left fears the most, and are most willing to destroy the country for, and anything or anyone who stands in their way. Therefore, I firmly believe that they are literally the tyrants in this scenario, and people are finally waking up.

I am sincerely curious as to how the left feels about Democrats like Bill Maher, Tulsi Gabbard, Mesha Mainor, and even John Fetterman, who are now preaching about how "I didn't leave the progressives, the progressives left me."

 

[Oompa Loompa]

He was charged with a state

WHOSE STATUTE OF LIMITATONS EXPIRED! WHAT WAS THE STATE CRIME TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CONCEAL! I am literally frustrated because I am conversing with people who are applauding kangaroo courts and making this country a banana Republic so they can sleep better at night knowing that their political opposition was unfairly incarcerated (some in this forum suggests executed). This is some Orwellian stuff!

 

[KCfromNC]

WHOSE STATUTE OF LIMITATONS EXPIRED!

Trump's lawyers tried to argue this. Turns out they were wrong (the best people and all that) : DocumentCloud

 

[iluvatar5150]

WHOSE STATUTE OF LIMITATONS EXPIRED! WHAT WAS THE STATE CRIME TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CONCEAL! I am literally frustrated because I am conversing with people who are applauding kangaroo courts and making this country a banana Republic so they can sleep better at night knowing that their political opposition was unfairly incarcerated (some in this forum suggests executed). This is some Orwellian stuff!

We’re all just as frustrated because you and the other TrumpFans keep getting a bunch of basic facts wrong, such as the claim about the statute of limitations that @KCfromNC just pointed out.

We all like getting into it, but it gets pretty ridiculous when one side refuses to do their homework.

 

[Pommer]

Well, if Trump keeps his promise by being a "dictator on the first day," he would be aggressively kicking out the corruption without hesitation as if he was staring on "The Apprentice!" You're Fired! But alas, that is what the liberal left fears the most, and are most willing to destroy the country with, is anything or anyone who stands in their way. Therefore, I firmly believe that they are literally the tyrants in this scenario, and people are finally waking up.

I am sincerely curious as to how the left feels about Democrats like Bill Maher, Tulsi Gabbard, Mesha Mainor, and even John Fetterman, who are now preaching about how "I didn't leave the progressives, the progressives left me."

Right, the “deep state” will fold without pushing back.
Probably, maybe, perhaps.

 

[BPPLEE]

Right, the “deep state” will fold without pushing back.
Probably, maybe, perhaps.

McCabe says they’re moving to other countries if Trump is elected

 

[Postvieww]

Did you ever, in your wildest nightmares, imagine that you would be defending a convicted felon, in hopes that he’d be able to turn it around before the November elections?

NY v. Trump: Judge reveals Facebook post implying juror discussed guilty verdict before trial concluded My my my it appears even the “felony “ may get thrown out. It seems all of the get Trump cases are falling apart.

 

[iluvatar5150]

NY v. Trump: Judge reveals Facebook post implying juror discussed guilty verdict before trial concluded My my my it appears even the “felony “ may get thrown out. It seems all of the get Trump cases are falling apart.

You might not want to hold your breath on that one. The comment came from a self-described troll account.

https://www.salon.com/2024/06/07/sleuths-hunt-down-intel-on-possible-facebook-claiming-early-knowledge-of-conviction/

 

[Oompa Loompa]

He wasn’t charged with federal crimes. He was charged with a state crime done in the pursuit of other (in some cases, federal) crimes.




Oh? You know what evidence was presented but not what he was charged with?


My “unidentified source” was the wikipedia link I provided in post #142. You’d have known that if you’d read it.



How are you going to show anything when don’t understand the basics of the case and don’t read anything that’s provided to you?

Charged with a state crime that was past its statute of limitations with the supposed intention of covering up election fraud (a federal crime) that was never introduced in court. Meaning that if this was actually a legitimate case, the state court would not have jurisdiction over it (because the statute of limitations have passed), and a federal court could only hear it if there was clear evidence that a federal crime had occurred (which there wasn't).

Regarding phony evidence, look at the entire testimony of Stormy Daniel's. What does her involvement with Trump, whether he wore a condom or not, or even him supposedly paying her to keep her mouth shut (something that she previously denied and has since changed her story) have to do with election interference? Again, a federal issue, not a state issue. Dare I even mention the testimony of the prosecutions star witness, Michael Cohen, who openly admitted that he intentionally falsified the documents to steal money from the Trump campaign without Trump's knowledge or consent, who openly admitted that his sole motive for testifying was vengeance because he felt that he did not get the bonus he felt he deserved? He blatantly admitted to a crime far worse than what Trump was being charged for. But leftist like yourself, and the "jury" don't care. The ends always justify the means, whether or not it destroys the country.

Wikipedia is your source?! Confirmation bias at its best.

 

[Brihaha]

NY v. Trump: Judge reveals Facebook post implying juror discussed guilty verdict before trial concluded My my my it appears even the “felony “ may get thrown out. It seems all of the get Trump cases are falling apart.

That seems to be the work of a professional online troll. A hoax if you will lol. It's trumpers' perceptions that are falling apart, as usual.

Newsmax Touts Dubious Trump Trial Facebook Post: ‘This Needs to Be a Mistrial Immediately’

A Newsmax host and guest credulously accepted as fact a random Facebook comment purporting to be the cousin of a juror in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial.

www.mediaite.com

 

[Fantine]

NY v. Trump: Judge reveals Facebook post implying juror discussed guilty verdict before trial concluded My my my it appears even the “felony “ may get thrown out. It seems all of the get Trump cases are falling apart.

The person to whom it is accredited, Michael Anderson, describes himself as a "professional bull artist."

 

[ViaCrucis]

He wasn’t charged with federal crimes. He was charged with a state crime done in the pursuit of other (in some cases, federal) crimes.

You're going to drive yourself mad trying to reason with people here. Don't forget to take a breather.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Yttrium]

WHOSE STATUTE OF LIMITATONS EXPIRED!

You keep saying that. New York state law disagrees. The statute of limitations can be extended by:

"Any period following the commission of the offense during which (i) the defendant was continuously outside this state or (ii) the whereabouts of the defendant were continuously unknown and continuously unascertainable by the exercise of reasonable diligence. However, in no event shall the period of limitation be extended by more than five years beyond the period otherwise applicable under subdivision two."

N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 30.10 – Timeliness of prosecutions

³ 30.10 Timeliness of prosecutions; periods of limitation. 1. A criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation prescribed in…

newyork.public.law

 

[iluvatar5150]

Charged with a state crime that was past its statute of limitations

So you say, but as has been pointed out, the court rejected that claim. Do you know why?

Wikipedia is your source?!

I also provided the judge’s instructions to the jury where he explained these other crimes, which you’d know if you’d read it.

Confirmation bias at its best.

Lol, that’s not what confirmation bias is. I’d give a link to the definition, but I see how much good that has done.

 

[essentialsaltes]

At least in my part of the infosphere, the juror thing was over before it even got started. I didn't even bother to pre-bunk it.

Perhaps I wasn't quite as sanguine as...

But, it looks like we have at least another news' cycle's worth of...