- Dec 14, 2018
- 589
- 276
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
is it fair to consider that if the 'days' of creation mean anything, they at least delineate periods of equal time? so each day of cretion is the same length of time be it 24 hours, 1000 years or 1 million years.
That is a fair and reasonable position to take. Would you consider it a fair position to believe that God is in control of the entire universe? And if this is the case, then time dilation (The parts of Einstein's theories that have been proven by experiment) could also play a factor? And if God created the universe, its initial phases and ongoing expansion would change the fabric of time and space within it. If God can manage our planet and also one 14 billion light years away, then the time constant of a "day" being a fixed length of time becomes somewhat meaningless. Scriptures like Psalms 90:4 are a simplification (as is the creation account) to allow us to have a conceptual grasp of God's frame of reference.
if we can agree on this, then how does that affect our consideration of the length of each day? Adam was created on the 6th day. is it fair to consider that the fall happened after the 7th day? if so then if we believe ech was say 100 million years long, then Adam was potentially 200 million years old at the fall! is this reasonble?
No, because Genesis 5:5 tells us that Adam only lived 930 years. It also implies that Cain killed Abel before Seth was born. (but considering the way the Bible tells stories in other parts of the Bible, it would be conceivable to me to appreciate an argument that it was outside of the first 130 years, even though it is definitely not written that way.)
Also, if Adam and Eve were living together for a significant period of time before the fall, it is not reasonable to think that they would not be multiplying as they were gifted to do in Genesis 1:28. As for your second question, the answer is yes. The fall could have happened after the 7th day even though the evening and morning clause is omitted, but there is just as much reason to think otherwise.
another ussue if we are teying to reconcile the genesis 1 account with science is that of the chronology of genesis 1. God created day and night before the sun was created, God created the earth and even plnt life before the sun was created - which must requirw that the was some other source of heat to replce the sun. this might all be possible and reasonable frim a scientific perspective, but not according to current theories of the universe, I believe.
Actually, according to current scientific theories as I understand it, the sun and the various planets were created concurrently. That being said it is a common fallacy to say that the Genesis account says that the earth and plant life were created before the sun. The sun existed as long as the earth did. It ignited in Genesis 1:3. It would not have been light in general from the aftermath of the Big Bang, because that happened 9 or 10 billion years earlier when there were no complex elements to make up our solar system. It is written that way, because visually, that is the way it appeared. Day and night existed from Genesis 1:5, again confirming it is the sun. However, just like you cannot see what the shape of the sun or moon is on an overcast day, you also cannot see it whenall over the earth this is going on:
Upvote
0