The Argument from Reason

[quatona]

I am tired of this silly, tedious method of insincere arguing you have adopted.

 

[KCfromNC]

The argument can be framed in Philosophic Logic, which is how it was done in the OP, it can be expressed by predicate logic or propositional logic or syllogistic logic.

The OP didn't address my question in the least, so I'm not sure why you are bringing it up.

See post 1, 5, 11, 12, 15, 34, 35, 38, 40, 42, 54, 56,58, 60, 65, 68, 69, 77, 86, 95, 97, 98, 128, 132, 133, 136 for an in depth explanation of the Argument from Reason, and the axioms are clearly stated in the early posts.

I never asked for the axioms of the argument from reason.

There are no valid epistemological views that are not based on logic, as 'valid' is a term of logic and can only be determined thereby.

This particular use of the term is the 5th of 5 non-archaic definitions of the word, so I'm not sure why you'd pretend it is the only acceptable use.

I am tired of this silly, tedious method of insincere arguing you have adopted. It does not bring anything to the table. As such, we are done. Good day, sir.

Declare victory and run away. How unexpected.

 

[ToddNotTodd]

Declare victory and run away. How unexpected.

When you start with such a terrible argument, it seems like a logical conclusion...