• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Argument from Reason

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The argument can be framed in Philosophic Logic, which is how it was done in the OP, it can be expressed by predicate logic or propositional logic or syllogistic logic.

The OP didn't address my question in the least, so I'm not sure why you are bringing it up.

See post 1, 5, 11, 12, 15, 34, 35, 38, 40, 42, 54, 56,58, 60, 65, 68, 69, 77, 86, 95, 97, 98, 128, 132, 133, 136 for an in depth explanation of the Argument from Reason, and the axioms are clearly stated in the early posts.

I never asked for the axioms of the argument from reason.

There are no valid epistemological views that are not based on logic, as 'valid' is a term of logic and can only be determined thereby.

This particular use of the term is the 5th of 5 non-archaic definitions of the word, so I'm not sure why you'd pretend it is the only acceptable use.

I am tired of this silly, tedious method of insincere arguing you have adopted. It does not bring anything to the table. As such, we are done. Good day, sir.

Declare victory and run away. How unexpected.
 
Upvote 0