I see only one explanation that does not have holes in the narrative. It also does not have a lot of bible backup either, but theres about as much as in the Gen account. It is the gap theory.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, I did not say I did not accept the "66" books. I said that I do not accept the myth of "only" 66 books.Ummmm and I have furrowed eyebrow at these statements...you seem to be accusing Skywriting of using extrabiblical literature, as if that is a bad thing....and then mention you do not accept the 66 books that make up the Bible, and cite the book of Jubilee...which is not part of the 66 books of the Bible...is that not by definition extrabiblical literature?![]()
This final thread is for those who believe that Genesis 4 and 5 describe real people. I would like to hear what you think we can reasonably infer about what the antediluvian world was like -- addressing the questions of when?, who?, what?, how?, where?, and why?. If you don't have an answer yourself, but are aware of someone or some organization that does, I would appreciate a reference. The main topics I am interested in are as follows:
1. History and chronology generally (see my first thread)
2. Individuals and relationships (see my second thread)
3. Social structures (Ex: Was Enoch a king and/or prophet?)
4. Flora and Fauna (Ex: Did humans really walk with dinosaurs?)
5. Technology (Ex: What about the Great Pyramid?)
6. Geography (Ex: Was there an above ground ocean then?)
7. Religion and existential issues (Ex: Did the ancients look at God and time like we do?)
I can't comment of evidence you have not provided.You wisely backed off answering how you knew that the early church had no interest in when the creation or flood occurred, because it has been documented that they did.
He's 'projecting" his own beliefs onto the early Church, without foundational reason or support.
I counted up the begets from Adam to Noah, it's 1556 years.
Yes, why would the early Church try to rewrite Scripture to prove Scripture was true from the beginning? Skywriting's comment does not make sense, because they did not doubt the Word, and had no need to try to prove the Word was true from the beginning, when their task was to preach the Good News that the promised Messiah had come, had atoned, and our sins are forgiven in Him...
The scriptures cover all important aspects of faith and Christianity through
40 authors writing from three continents over nearly two thousand years.
If its not thoroughly covered, then it is incidental. God didn't think it
important enough to tell us when Jesus was born. The year of Creation,
that much less.
You're not the first: These are final counts leading to creation BC: 5501, 5492, 5426, 5411, 5199, 4192, 4141, 4103, 4079, 4062, 4053, 4051, 4042, 4041, 4021, 4005, 4004, 4001, 3983, 3975, 3974, 3971, 3971, 3970, 3968, 3966, 3964, 3963, 3958, 3949, 3927, 3836
You forgot to include the source material.