- Dec 20, 2009
- 28,369
- 7,745
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
Since both are matters of sexual immorality, the different treatment illustrated in the above post is a form of hypocrisy.Hypocrisy is saying the right things while doing the wrong things.
If the church rightly rejects homosexuality and its queer variants because it rightly believes these sins/statuses are wrong, then there is no hypocrisy. That is regardless of whether it has hypocrisy on other issues.
I think the divorce issue is not one of hypocrisy but of loose standards. They don't expect people to live up to the biblical standard, so they adjust it. It would only be hypocrisy if they preach against divorce, then allow it/close their eyes to it.
I personally would accept divorced people in the congregation, but not in the leadership. I base this on Jesus' acknowledgment that people's hearts are hard. It would be better if they did not divorce, but since they have, we should have mercy on them.
Also, some people are divorced against their will. I've had two different roommates in two different states say they were completely surprised when their wives literally walked out the door with their bags packed and divorce papers on the way.
Divorce itself isn't the issue, re-marrying is the issue when it comes to sexual immorality.
If you're hardlined against one form of sexual immorality, then don't softball another kind. In the same way, if you're merciful to one then be merciful to another. Pick one though, mixing and matching like that based on personal preference is the very definition of lukewarm, God spits that stuff out of his mouth.
To Jesus, all sexual immorality is the same.
Upvote
0