• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The 11th Commandment?

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
39
Oxford, UK
✟39,693.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
If you had the opportunity to add an 11th commandment to the set of commandments, what would it be and why?

I KNOW somebody is going to try clowning around, please dont, seriously

The Golden Rule. And I'd put it at the top...
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
I know the mockers don't care, but I would certainly hope that the Christians here would have too much reverence for God's word to believe that they can add to it.
This is just for funsies and theoretical, no one is actually advocating for an addendum to the 10 commandments. So dont be a stick in the mud and tell us your answer
 
Upvote 0

psychedelicist

aka the Akhashic Record Player
Aug 9, 2004
2,581
101
37
McKinney, Texas
✟25,751.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
i think buddha shakyamuni put it best: Do not believe based on what you are told. Do not believe because i tell you. do not believe because the holy men tell you to. Do not believe for any external reason, but believe because you fell it to be the right thing.

Very short and paraphrased, i can try and find the full version if anyone would like to see it.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
39
Oxford, UK
✟39,693.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
i think buddha shakyamuni put it best: Do not believe based on what you are told. Do not believe because i tell you. do not believe because the holy men tell you to. Do not believe for any external reason, but believe because you fell it to be the right thing.

Very short and paraphrased, i can try and find the full version if anyone would like to see it.

Yes please!
 
Upvote 0

sbvera13

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2007
1,914
182
✟25,490.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
Upvote 0

MikeMcK

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2002
9,600
654
✟13,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
This is just for funsies and theoretical, no one is actually advocating for an addendum to the 10 commandments.

That's just the point. God's word is holy and should not be used for sport.

So dont be a stick in the mud and tell us your answer

Being reverent and respectful is not the same thing as being a stick in the mud.

There are a lot of ways to have a good time without degrading God's word.
 
Upvote 0

psychedelicist

aka the Akhashic Record Player
Aug 9, 2004
2,581
101
37
McKinney, Texas
✟25,751.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
Yes please!

hmm well i found the 'original' version but it is nothing like the phrase as i heard it the first time. here is the original verson:

Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing ;
nor upon tradition
nor upon rumor ;
nor upon what is in a scripture ;
nor upon surmise;
nor upon an axiom;
nor upon specious reasoning;
nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over;
nor upon another's seeming ability;
nor upon the consideration, "The monk is our teacher."
Kalamas, when you yourselves know: "These things are good; these things are not blamable; these things are praised by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to benefit and happiness," enter on and abide in them.'
 
Upvote 0