Ok! so your opinion plus a poll you agree is inaccurate equals proof that researchers always fudge their data.
This is way past the point of being merely worthless.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So that's 1 out of 300 that admit that they falsify data.
I wonder what the real number is for all the figures.
I'll be cold hearted and say 10 times that.
The there is the influence on results that people don't even admit
to themselves, much less to a written poll.
And we can't know the figures for the people who choose not to respond.
And we can't know why they choose not to respond.
You can say whatever you like just as long as you start with, 'in my opinion' because you are at least telling the reader that you think your opinion carries no more weight than theirs.
What you are essentially saying is that because you and your coworkers fudge your data everyone else must be doing it.So that's 1 out of 300 that admit that they falsify data.
I wonder what the real number is for all the figures.
I'll be cold hearted and say 10 times that.
The there is the influence on results that people don't even admit
to themselves, much less to a written poll.
And we can't know the figures for the people who choose not to respond.
And we can't know why they choose not to respond.
I've been in R&D for 30 years myself. When people are working on projects that are
for their own gain and advancement, I put the number at 100% for "significant influence"
on the results of a research project. Meaning, they don't let the facts get in the way
of moving the project forward if they can possibly help it.
I'm sorry, when did I ever claim to accept any evidence thrown out there for my position? If I see something I consider to be untruthful, whether it be for or against my position, I will speak out against it.
You see, atheism ideally is built upon critical thinking, and in critical thinking, you don't blindly accept a piece of proof just because it purports to support your position, you kinda critically assess the proof first. I critically assessed the premise 'wooden structures over 300ft cannot be water-tight', and found it lacking. I only wish the creationists and fundamentalists would do the same to their own proof.
98% of scriptures ( rough guess) don't break any Scientific laws or principals. So of all the people who have found the 98% to be True, only a percentage of those have a scientific interest in evaluating the 2% that causes a problem.
I never realized until just recently how myopic science is.
It's not only myopic, but it spreads its myopia to those who adhere to it so substantially.
In many cases it even causes blindness.
Now consider that the Christian geologists who first determined that the earth's geological record could not be the result of a global flood had set out to prove that it was the result of a global flood. If they fudged their data the way you and the people you work with do they would not have been forced by the data to conclude that the earth's geology was not the result of a global flood.
Ok! so your opinion plus a poll you agree is inaccurate equals proof that researchers always fudge their data.
This is way past the point of being merely worthless.
Now, of course we all know that we like polls that agree and dislike ones that dont agree with what we want.
So I posted this for you to pick out your own favorites:
researchers cheating
Science cheating
Science fraud
Perhaps you don't know what their true motivation was and they did come to a conclusion they wanted to find. Hard for us to evaluate, as your link didn't show up on the post.
if you believe in this story of Noah and the great flood to be 100% true.. i have to ask.. [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth]?
Who said anything about complex?You can believe in something complex, or you can believe in something simple. That really makes no difference. The point is, without belief in something we could not survive.
Of course they are. Anything which people worship becomes their god.
In which case, you do not yet understand anthropology.
SOAP? what are you talking about.. the site edited what i really said
You would willingly die for a god you have never seen, only to deprive your family and loved ones? Really?
Atheism is never ever thinking about a god, (unless you're on a religious forum)
Atheism is a belief just as not collecting stamps is a hobby.
Agnosticism is just another word for sitting on the fence, a 'don't know'.
If there were no religions it would not effect Atheists one jot.
The only time I think about Atheism is when someone asks 'do I believe there is a god' and I say no.
Atheism means never needing to pray or say 'grace'.
Atheism for me means my god does not exist.
Atheism means I do not have a god in my head.
Atheism means I know I'm going to die when I die.
Everyone has a god except an Atheist.
An Atheist is a person who believes in one less god than you.
Atheism is a non prophet organisation.
Like cats Atheists walk alone.
Do you still think Atheism is a belief?
CA:
Chimpanzees are conscious. They survive. What do they believe in?
I think it would be better to say that everyone needs something worth living for, however banal. It certainly doesn't have to be anything to do with religion.
98% of scriptures ( rough guess) don't break any Scientific laws or principals. So of all the people who have found the 98% to be True, only a percentage of those have a scientific interest in evaluating the 2% that causes a problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?