that never seemed to stop them repeatedly investigating and coming to the same conclusions over and over again. That's why I got the impression some Republicans just liked to investigate things so much. And here was another chance to do so.
that never seemed to stop them repeatedly investigating and coming to the same conclusions over and over again. That's why I got the impression some Republicans just liked to investigate things so much. And here was another chance to do so.
tulc(is pretty sure President Trump will encourage this investigation, right?)
Wait, this thread is about the recent attack, right? I was saying I'm looking forward to seeing the report from those Republicans who seem to love to investigate those sorts of things, now you want to discuss Benghazi instead? I think if that's what you want to discuss shouldn't you start a thread about it? My post was about the OP, yours seems to be about something else.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
I brought it up to show that some Republicans like investigating things, not as a subject for the thread. See the difference? It didn't seem to matter that after 9 investigations that reached the same conclusion they simply had to have that 10th one. That came to the same conclusion as the other 9. Now to me? That sounds an awful lot like a group of people who just like to investigate attacks on embassies and clearly, here's another chance to do so. I'm not sure why there would be any hesitation on the part of those Republicans in congress not to jump on this chance to do it all over again.
I brought it up to show that some Republicans like investigating things, not as a subject for the thread. See the difference? It didn't seem to matter that after 9 investigations that reached the same conclusion they simply had to have that 10th one. That came to the same conclusion as the other 9. Now to me? That sounds an awful lot like a group of people who just like to investigate attacks on embassies and clearly, here's another chance to do so. I'm not sure why there would be any hesitation on the part of those Republicans in congress not to jump on this chance to do it all over again.
tulc(hopes that clears up any questions)
I brought it up to show that some Republicans like investigating things, not as a subject for the thread. See the difference? It didn't seem to matter that after 9 investigations that reached the same conclusion they simply had to have that 10th one. That came to the same conclusion as the other 9. Now to me? That sounds an awful lot like a group of people who just like to investigate attacks on embassies and clearly, here's another chance to do so. I'm not sure why there would be any hesitation on the part of those Republicans in congress not to jump on this chance to do it all over again.
tulc(hopes that clears up any questions)
Not to mention Ambassador Stevens was not at the embassy where he would have been better protected.
laugh.. they all seem to be a little spine-less compare to Trump.. (and I liked the past R presidents, for the most part)
He's standing up to Iran, Obama gave them money to further their terrorism.
...are you saying since they came to the same conclusion in the last investigation as they did in the first 5 or 6 investigations but they kept investigating it over and over again and it wasn't because they liked investigating embassy attacks why would they keep investigating it. You don't think they had some other motive for doing it do you?
...are you saying since they came to the same conclusion in the last investigation as they did in the first 5 or 6 investigations but they kept investigating it over and over again and it wasn't because they liked investigating embassy attacks why would they keep investigating it. You don't think they had some other motive for doing it do you?
tulc(is wondering what they were hoping to accomplish)
link?
Yeah, it's too bad there's no treaty in place where the two governments could have a framework so they could work to fix these sorts of situations when there's a problem...oh wait...
Probably not, since so far, your posts appear to indicate you don't seem to know what any Democrat thinks, believes or wants.
...are you suggesting the Republicans didn't investigate because they liked investigating embassy attacks they actually were using the attack on the embassy and the death of Americans as just an excuse to continuously attack/investigate Hillary Clinton instead?
...are you saying since they came to the same conclusion in the last investigation as they did in the first 5 or 6 investigations but they kept investigating it over and over again and it wasn't because they liked investigating embassy attacks why would they keep investigating it. You don't think they had some other motive for doing it do you?
tulc(is wondering what they were hoping to accomplish)
So the fact that they reached the very same conclusion in the ninth investigation as in the first investigation made them want to conduct that final tenth investigation just in case they missed something in all those other ones? Because I would have taken that as a sign they really liked investigating embassy attacks but post #35 seemed to suggest there was a more...personal reason. almost like the Republicans were merely using the attack and the deaths of Americans as a way to attack someone they didn't like. Of course if Republicans conduct several investigations into this recent attack then that would go a long way toward showing that they just really like investigating embassy attacks.
