Originally posted by strathyboy
I have some issues with your source and with your presentation of the statistics presented within.
Well, youll have to take that up with the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, a part of The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Its their report, not mine.
First off, your source says that 47% of Christians say that belief in God is necessary to be moral. This does not mean that 47% of Christians think that atheists are bad people. I do not equate morality with the worth of a person in any way. For instance, I have a roommate who, to put it mildly, gets around. He's a real ladies man. I think his actions are immoral, but I do not hate him, think he's a bad person, or otherwise discriminate against him because he does not share my beliefs.
Like I said above, I think that most people loosely equate morality with good and immorality with bad.
Second, the first few pages of the essay seem blatantly anti-religious. It mocks those who have joined a religion since September 11th, suggesting that religion as a whole was to blame for the attacks, and is still to blame for much of the conflict in the world today. I would question just how "objective" the poll used to gain that 47% statistic is.
I think that you would be hard pressed to find too many people who are critical of their objectivity. They do a lot of very objective work.
Pew Forum
Pew Charitable Trusts
Do you think badly about Christians for "no good reason"?
Since Im married to a Christian, Id say "no" to your question.
I still question why Ted Williams was used as an example. Using him to try to push an atheist agenda by proving to Christians that some non-Christians can be famous too seems low.
Again, I asked the question would people think differently of him if they knew that he was an atheist. Its a reasonable question given the widespread prejudice against atheists in the US. And, I did not use him as an example a
famous non-believer but someone who is thought very highly of for the things that he has done. And I asked if people would continue to think so highly of him if they generally knew he was an atheist.
EDIT: Apparently you didn't even read the website you gave. There are several reasons in there why that website believes Christians would believe atheists to be immoral. Again, if I think an atheist is immoral, I do not think that they are bad or desire to harm them in any way.
Your suggestion that Christians near you have such feelings is a thoroughly unconvincing argument. Using unproveable personal examples to attempt to prove a generalization about the whole of Christianity is simply bad logic.
If you really want, Id be happy to find for you a lot more situations.
By the way, this was in my newspaper today. I found it in another because my paper doesnt post these columns on their website.
Hateful column
Against what other group would newspapers across the US actually feel free to publish such rubbish? Not against Jews. Not against blacks, and in many places not against gays. But I guess that it's OK to stir public hatred against atheists. Why is that OK?
