Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yet here you are.Perhaps not, but if I’m ignoring him, I won’t be actively aware of whatever cockamamie thing he’s up to, at a given point.
That cartoon had more class and credibilty.I was just about to ask if Dylan Mulvaney was Anheuser-Busch's version of Joe Camel.
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is intensifying demands that Anheuser-Busch InBev hand over a trove of documents for his investigation of whether Bud Lite’s partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney was marketing beer to children.
The requested documents include communications between the company and Dylan Mulvaney, scripts for social media content, the company’s corporate policy for advertising on social media, and any data that the beer giant possessed on the age demographics of Dylan Mulvaney’s social media following.
Ted Cruz rails against Anheuser-Busch for stonewalling his probe of partnership with Dylan Mulvaney
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is intensifying demands that Anheuser-Busch InBev hand over a trove of documents for his investigation of whether Bud Lite’s partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney was marketing beer to children.www.washingtontimes.com
Why’s it being requested?All this really makes AB look guilty. If they have nothing to hide, why don't they turn over the requested information?
I'm here to do Yah's work to save his children.Any of us could do this for half (or less) of what Cruz makes, and those of us on CF who make a point of publicizing such witch hunts could probably even do it much better than he does. Why are you wasting your time here on CF, Hark!, when your country apparently needs you to keep the trans beers from turning everyone's daughters into their sons and vice-versa?
To review whether or not they have an agenda to target children.Why’s it being requested?
Heaven is for Yah's children, and his glory.Else what’s a heaven for?
If AB is targeting children wouldn't you want to know and stop it?Why’s it being requested?
According to the fine reporting for the WashingtonTimesTo review whether or not they have an agenda to target children.
I thought that was pretty obvious.
So the industry review board gave AB In-Bev a clean bill, but somehow not producing documents that the good Senator from Texas desires is “stonewalling”?The company has failed to comply since an industry review board found the advertising campaign did not target underage drinkers.
Did the review board review the demographics that AB studied before they created this ad?According to the fine reporting for the WashingtonTimes
So the industry review board gave AB In-Bev a clean bill, but somehow not producing documents that the good Senator from Texas desires is “stonewalling”?
Because a skilled attorney can make anything look nefarious and since Ted Cruz has no real need for the data, it's obviously meant to be for messaging purposes.All this really makes AB look guilty. If they have nothing to hide, why don't they turn over the requested information?
If there was nothing to hide; and this information was turned over back in March when it was requested; this message wouldn't exist.Because a skilled attorney can make anything look nefarious and since Ted Cruz has no real need for the data, it's obviously meant to be for messaging purposes.
It’s standard political theatre schtick, I’ll grant you, but not much else.Did the review board review the demographics that AB studied before they created this ad?
Doubt it!
Is this review board composed of corporations within the industry, who might also benefit from targeting children?
Since this industry is self regulating; isn't that like the fox guarding the hen house?
How do you know Cruz has no need of the data? AB could work to convince him and now everyone else they are not doing what they are accused of.Because a skilled attorney can make anything look nefarious and since Ted Cruz has no real need for the data, it's obviously meant to be for messaging purposes.
Suddenly a corporation exercising it’s rights against self-incrimination is bad now?If there was nothing to hide; and this information was turned over back in March when it was requested; this message wouldn't exist.
Says you - I for one want to know if AB is targeting children, I find it odd you do not.It’s standard political theatre schtick, I’ll grant you, but not much else.
Self incrimination? Why what ever could you mean by that?Suddenly a corporation exercising it’s rights against self-incrimination is bad now?
Huh.
Great Mister Cruz can try for a subpoena if he wants to attempt that, but I’m going to guess that that option isn’t within his purview so he’s stuck with writing strongly worded letters to AB-INBev and issuing press releases.Says you -I for one want to know if AB is targeting children, I find it odd you do not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?