For David had done what was right in the eyes of the LORD and had not failed to keep any of the LORD's commands all the days of his life - except in the case of Uriah the Hittite. 1 Kings 15:5
God says David kept all of his commandments all the days of his life, aside from having Uriah killed. So multiple wives and concubines is not a sin according to God. Or was God wrong?[/QUOTE]
You're violating the rules of proper hermeneutics and exigesis. The Bible has situations where at first it doesn't compute. Scripture is always interpreted by scripture. Adultery is forbidden. Therefore Kings cannot be interpreted that adultery is acceptable. David admitted sin on many occasions including the census. Therefore Kings cannot be interpreted to mean David committed no sin except Uriah.
The other thing of note is the phrase "except in the case of Uriah" is not found in the LXX. It was most likely something that was written by a transcriber in the margins. This would also make sense when you interpret scripture with scripture. David committed more sins than one. He admitted it. Yet in Psalms he is called blameless.
David paid for the sins of his life in many ways. But he would not pay for them eternally. He was not judged by God because of his heart. He was a sinful man who's sin was not held against him due to his heart which was actually towards God and not away from him. But that did not stop David from suffering in this life for his sinful acts.
There are enough scriptures supporting the idea that 1 man and 1 woman was God's original intent. As today, we are no different. God proclaims me faultless because if my heart towards Christ. Not because I am actually faultless. God n get says my sin is "okay". It's just forgiven and I am righteous.
Another important point is the Hebrew word soor is used here. It's not a reference to keeping commands. But a meaning of turning away. And as we see throughout David's life, while he did not keep all of God's commands he also did not turn away from them and still recognized when he failed. That's the point.
So God did not say it was okay to have concubines or many wives.
God says David kept all of his commandments all the days of his life, aside from having Uriah killed. So multiple wives and concubines is not a sin according to God. Or was God wrong?[/QUOTE]
You're violating the rules of proper hermeneutics and exigesis. The Bible has situations where at first it doesn't compute. Scripture is always interpreted by scripture. Adultery is forbidden. Therefore Kings cannot be interpreted that adultery is acceptable. David admitted sin on many occasions including the census. Therefore Kings cannot be interpreted to mean David committed no sin except Uriah.
The other thing of note is the phrase "except in the case of Uriah" is not found in the LXX. It was most likely something that was written by a transcriber in the margins. This would also make sense when you interpret scripture with scripture. David committed more sins than one. He admitted it. Yet in Psalms he is called blameless.
David paid for the sins of his life in many ways. But he would not pay for them eternally. He was not judged by God because of his heart. He was a sinful man who's sin was not held against him due to his heart which was actually towards God and not away from him. But that did not stop David from suffering in this life for his sinful acts.
There are enough scriptures supporting the idea that 1 man and 1 woman was God's original intent. As today, we are no different. God proclaims me faultless because if my heart towards Christ. Not because I am actually faultless. God n get says my sin is "okay". It's just forgiven and I am righteous.
Another important point is the Hebrew word soor is used here. It's not a reference to keeping commands. But a meaning of turning away. And as we see throughout David's life, while he did not keep all of God's commands he also did not turn away from them and still recognized when he failed. That's the point.
So God did not say it was okay to have concubines or many wives.
Upvote
0