• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Taking the offense out of the CROSS!

Status
Not open for further replies.

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Scrivner said:
Hell is not SIMPLY chosen. It is also rendered as a penalty for the violation of God's law upon non-believing sinners.

Let's assume there is an eternal existence that can be called "hell". You're not going to get that from all Christians but it makes the discussion easier...

This passage then states that Jesus will draw all men, even the Taoist, up to himself:

[bible]John 12:32[/bible]

Some *may* reject him and choose eternity without accepting God's grace. Maybe. But, even then, you don't have eternal punishment you simply have a hell that has doors that are locked from the inside.

Of course, I think that the love of God is strong enough to keep all hardened hearts from resisting being drawn up...
 
Upvote 0
S

Scrivner

Guest
stumpjumper said:
The good news is that God loved and loves us when we were yet sinners. The good news is a message of salvation not torment and punishment...
We cannot understand the good news of God's salvation (his pardon) before we understand the truth about his punishment -- punishment that God will render upon the non-believing sinner or Christ as his atonement.
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Scrivner said:
We cannot understand the good news of God's salvation (his pardon) before we understand the truth about his punishment -- punishment that God will render upon the non-believing sinner or Christ as his atonement.

The penalty of sin is death not "eternal punishment"!

We are saved from death and sin by the love of God and that is the good news.

You most certainly can understand salvation without believing in eternal punishment.
 
Upvote 0
S

Scrivner

Guest
As long as we both agree that there is a divine penalty of the violation of God's law, we're cool and we're in agreement.

It is not my concern whether you call that penalty "torture," "hell," "eternal destruction," "death" or any other word.

Just so long as you agree that the operation of divine wrath upon the non-believing sinner is not corrective, pedagogical, or transfiguring.
 
Upvote 0

Im_A

Legend
May 10, 2004
20,113
1,495
✟42,869.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Scrivner said:
As long as we both agree that there is a divine penalty of the violation of God's law, we're cool and we're in agreement.

It is not my concern whether you call that penalty "torture," "hell," "eternal destruction," "death" or any other word.

Just so long as you agree that the operation of divine wrath upon the non-believing sinner is not corrective, pedagogical, or transfiguring.

YOU HAVE TO BE JOKING.

the very crux of your previous post was the word "eternal"/"everlasting." and now, semantics don't matter?

i'm not saying that i want to be in a heavy debate, but come on...stay consistant!

i'm done with this discussion. if any atheists/agnostics who want to answer my question that i posted earlier, please pm me...i still would appreciate it.

God Bless you Scrivner, and God Bless you all! <><
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Scrivner said:
Just so long as you agree that the operation of divine wrath upon the non-believing sinner is not corrective, pedagogical, or transfiguring.

Well I don't agree but I have to go.

I don't buy the divine penalty bit either but if there is a hell it is probably not corrective. It is most likely empty...
 
Upvote 0
S

Scrivner

Guest
stumpjumper said:
Well I don't agree but I have to go.

I don't buy the divine penalty bit either but if there is a hell it is probably not corrective. It is most likely empty...
So, in other words, you believe that when God does punish, he does so ALWAYS with the end of amending and correcting the object of his punishment? This is not Biblical.
 
Upvote 0

Chrysalis Kat

Gettin' Riggy With It
Nov 25, 2004
4,052
312
TEXAS
✟28,387.00
Faith
Politics
US-Democrat
Scrivner said:
T.

Thus, the phrases I use hi-light what is usually hidden -- the fact that God is active in punishing non-Believing sinners and the punishment does not have correction as its intended end.

.
And that my dear is the definition of torture and abuse right there.
 
Upvote 0
S

Scrivner

Guest
Chrysalis Kat said:
And that my dear is the definition of torture and abuse right there.
It's not cruelty. It's virtuous behavior for God. It is the operation of divine justice. If a person were to do it to another person -- requiting sorrow for wrong, this would be cruelty. But when God does it, God the law-giver and law enforcer, it is divine virtue.
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Scrivner said:
So, in other words, you believe that when God does punish, he does so ALWAYS with the end of amending and correcting the object of his punishment? This is not Biblical.

No. I don't believe God "punishes" anyone. Period. There might be an existence that could be termed hell and it might be eternal. I don't know. If there is it is not up to Christians to determine who goes to hell and who does not as we are not to judge others.

What the Bible does say though is that it is up to man to come into the light and that is through God's grace. The condemnation is not a punishment but what happens when one does not step into the light:
The Gospel According to St. John, Chapter 3, Verses 19-21
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.​
It is how man reacts to the light and whether or not we have faith, hope, and love in our hearts that is what determines our eternal destiny. Not whether or not we are going to be on the recieving end of a whooping from God...

It's not cruelty. It's virtuous behavior for God. It is the operation of divine justice. If a person were to do it to another person -- requiting sorrow for wrong, this would be cruelty. But when God does it, God the law-giver and law enforcer, it is divine virtue.

The way you are describing God it most certainly is cruelty.

Why are you stating that people are more virtuous than God? Does not that strike you as the least bit odd?
 
Upvote 0

Athene

Grammatically incorrect
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
14,036
1,319
✟87,546.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Scrivner said:
It's not cruelty. It's virtuous behavior for God. It is the operation of divine justice. If a person were to do it to another person -- requiting sorrow for wrong, this would be cruelty. But when God does it, God the law-giver and law enforcer, it is divine virtue.

Ok, I'm calling parody, you scrivner/delft or whatever are playing games.
 
Upvote 0
S

Scrivner

Guest
Athene said:
Ok, I'm calling parody, you scrivner/delft or whatever are playing games.
No parody.




You seem to assume that the difference between God and man would not justify God acting differently toward people than he commands us to act toward people. Surely this assumption is wrong. First of all, God knows all things and is all wise. We are not only finite but sinful. As Jonathan Edwards said concerning God's right to do what we are forbidden to do:
It may be unfit and so immoral, for any other beings to go about to order this affair; because they are not possessed of a wisdom, that in any other manner fits them for it; -and in other respects they are not fit to be trusted with this affair; nor does it belong to-them, they not being the owners and Lords of the universe. (Freedom of the Will, New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 41 1)



When God says - "See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god beside me; I kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; and there is none that can deliver out of my hand," he is claiming moral prerogatives which we are denied. It is divinely virtuous to do something -- penalize wrongers -- that it would be cruel for us to do. The potter has rights which the pots do not have.


When he is God and he owns the world, what is divinely virtuous is what he does to it. The Bible is God's description of what he does to it, and there he tells us that he punishes the non-believing sinner.
 
Upvote 0

bobhope

Active Member
Mar 4, 2006
171
6
Denver, CO
✟22,841.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.