- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,221
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
That's okay... logic is not the main reason to convert anyway.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's okay... logic is not the main reason to convert anyway.For the record, I'm completely secure in my own philosophical beliefs. I'm not about to convert any time soon, if that's what you think will happen.
The fundamentals of Christianity are completely illogical to me.
Oh, I've given up on presenting evidence that you'd recognize anyway. I'm just saying that your lack of understanding, and the inability of evolutionists in general to 'actually' connect deep-time links, should by default make Creation the more reasonable choice for our being here. There is no evidence for your belief beyond speculation.
And, why should I take your interpretation over mine... when you don't even believe in God.
Yeah, right
When last I looked, 'reason' invokes logic ..(?)inquiring mind said:That's okay... logic is not the main reason to convert anyway.
It's telomeres were not moving toward separation; not like they are today.
I bet you're yet to meet 'anyone' that does.I doubt if you even understand the concept of evidence. I have yet to meet a creationist that does.
It's not the scientific evidence that's a problem. I don't care how defined it is; it's the conclusions drawn from it that can result in false claims.In the sciences one must use scientific evidence. It is very well defined and there seriously is none for the creationist position.
The 'concept of scientific evidence' doesn't necessarily equal intelligence.And no, it is a falsehood to make your last claim. I will assume that your falsehood arose from ignorance and was not an attempt to openly lie. Once again I offer to go over the concept of scientific evidence with you.
And yet you do not believe in God.Because my interpretation does not call God a liar. Creationists simply do not understand the sciences well enough to see how they are doing this. Creationism is blasphemy.
Yeah, rightWell that is quite the refutation. Once again I can tell that you do not understand the scientific method or the concept of evidence. I sincerely offer to discuss these with you. If you understand these basic concepts, that should not go against your Christian beliefs, you will see how all of your claims are false.
A relationship with God is by grace.When last I looked, 'reason' invokes logic ..(?)
I bet you're yet to meet 'anyone' that does.
It's not the scientific evidence that's a problem. I don't care how defined it is; it's the conclusions drawn from it that can result in false claims.
The 'concept of scientific evidence' doesn't necessarily equal intelligence.
And yet you do not believe in God.
Yeah, right
The interpretation of that is going to vary by sect. For example if I remember correctly Calvinists not only believe that "grace" which enables faith comes from God, it is God's choice who gets it and it is chosen before one is born. That seems to make the religion rather pointless.'By grace' is still a logical reason though(?)
So, by most people you mean those that agree with you already?On the contrary, most people have no problem at all discussing the topics. It is creationists that are scared to death to even discuss evidence. I think most know that they are wrong. Deep down inside they know that what they are saying is false. If they understood the concept of evidence they would have no excuse.
Because you have all the answers???If you understood the concept of evidence then you could demonstrate claims to be false. How do you think that we know that life is not the product of your sort of creationism?
Well, that's good to know.I never claimed that it did. I never implied that you lack intelligence. You lack education. That can be corrected.
Atheists are atheists because they have no relationship with God.And yet I also understand many aspects of your Bible better than you do. In fact the reason that many atheists are atheists is because they understand the Bible.
Yes, I'm sure you would:Please, you only confirm my claims by running away. Here is an easy way to show that I am wrong. Learn what is and what is not evidence. I do not use "my definition". I will find several reliable sources that support me. This is a concept that you can learn. Living in fear only will get you nowhere.
Well... it's God's grace, not ours.'By grace' is still a logical reason though(?)
So, by most people you mean those that agree with you already?
Because you have all the answers???
Well, that's good to know.
Atheists are atheists because they have no relationship with God.
Perhaps you might want to tell us what your interpretation of the word "grace" is. I don't think that you mean that he does not bump into things. Too many Christians cannot define that term.Well... it's God's grace, not ours.
Dying.Care to elaborate what you mean about telomeres moving toward separation (in humans) today?
In Western Christian theology, grace is "the love and mercy given to us by God because God desires us to have it, not necessarily because of anything we have done to earn it". It is not a created substance of any kind. ... It is an attribute of God that is most manifest in the salvation of sinners.Perhaps you might want to tell us what your interpretation of the word "grace" is. I don't think that you mean that he does not bump into things. Too many Christians cannot define that term.
Dying.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?