It is only the creationists who claim that God does not exist if scientific theories are true.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The dogma, fable and fanatical ritual of the Godless creationists who teach that mankind is the result of only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago is exposed by the diagram and the faith-based belief that random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanisms created the infinitely complex universe, the infinitely complex life we observe today is quickly shown to be a farce by your diagram also.
It is only the creationists who claim that God does not exist if scientific theories are true.
What?
The old advice is that when you dig yourself into a hole, you should stop digging. You keep digging. I am asking you if you want a shovel.
Only the antichrists will deny the fact that Jesus Christ is creator.
Where in the scientific method does it say that any deity is not a creator? Where in the theory of evolution does it say that there are no creator deities?
There is no deity allowed in the guesses and suppositions of macro evolution.
In the guesses and suppositions of macro evolution, only naturalistic mechanisms are created with, the only source of, humanity appearing on earth.
Does that mean that all the members of other religions are antichrist? What about the Christians that believe that God was the creator and Jesus came in later?Only the antichrists will deny the fact that Jesus Christ is creator.
The dogma, fable and fanatical ritual of the Godless creationists who teach that mankind is the result of only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago is exposed by the diagram and the faith-based belief that random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanisms created the infinitely complex universe, the infinitely complex life we observe today is quickly shown to be a farce by your diagram also.
There is no deity allowed in the guesses and suppositions of macro evolution. In the guesses and suppositions of macro evolution, only naturalistic mechanisms are created with, the only source of, humanity appearing on earth.
Now you can't even be honest about the scientific method.
Deities are certainly allowed in the scientific method.
Also, macroevolution is a well supported scientific theory, not a guess or a supposition.
Why do you have to lie about this?
Nowhere in the theory of evolution does it say that.
Does that mean that all the members of other religions are antichrist?
What about the Christians that believe that God was the creator and Jesus came in later?
By your definitions there are only a select few who are Christians and all the rest are antichrists.
Interesting to say the least.
Dizredux
I didn't ask you, but thanks for showing everyone that you can't find the "demons" in the scientific method either.
The flow chart doesn't work for macroevolution.
But it does, somehow, for microevolution, right?
Wrong. All the same evidence supports evolution. You're arbitrary acceptance of one part of a scientific theory and fact of biology simple amounts to "I believe in a little bit of evolution, but not a lot."
That's like saying you don't believe in water because you believe in drops of water, but not oceans.
How am I lying about the scientific method? Give an example.
Where? When? How? Give an example.
There is absolutely no scientific evidence that humanity, an alleged product of macroevolution, is the product of a random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanism acting on a single life form from long long ago.
Why do you have to respond with the typical 'yer a liar' response that's so common with the Godless promoting their creation-ist swill?
All you have to do is give an example of humanity being the product of something other than only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago.
I await.
All you have to do is apply macroevolution to the flow chart. Now, what is the result?
You claimed that deities can't be part of the scientific method and scientific theories.
Hypothesis: If Thor creates lightning, then we should be able to see Thor in the clouds during thunderstorms.
Experiment: Take pictures of clouds during thunderstorms.
You are lying again.
Because you lie. If you don't like being called a liar, then stop lying.
That's what you need to do. It is your claim that a deity created humanity. Where is your evidence?
Observation: Retroviruses insert randomly among millions of potential bases in a genome. We find remnants of retroviral insertions in the genomes of primates, including humans.
Hypothesis: If humans evolved from an ancestor shared with other primates, then we should find the same remnants of retroviral insertions at the same position in the genomes of multiple species of primates, including humans.
Test: We find over 200,000 retroviral remnants in both the human and chimp genomes at the same exact spots while only a relative handful are found at non-orthologous positions.
Conclusion: Humans evolved from an ancestor shared with chimps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?