• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Surely this cannot be allowed...

Timothy

Mad Anglican geek at large
Jan 1, 2004
8,055
368
Birmingham.... [Bur-min'-um]
✟32,765.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Umm... 'Disgusting' is a pretty strong word to describe that. I led worship this morning in an Anglican church where apart from the drums (need to find a drumkit that our drummer can use--his are rather non-portable) our regular worship isn't that dissimilar, apart from the fact we have a vicar with rather better taste in how he acts...
 
Upvote 0

albrecht

Newbie
Jan 19, 2012
48
0
Nevada
✟22,658.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Whats wrong:

Its crass...

Its trite...

Its about the people rather than god.

This. Precisely this. It's pure indulgence; there is no hint of reverence.

I don't think the music itself is the problem. It's the fact that it devalues what it purports to represent.
 
Upvote 0

vespasia

Franciscan.
Site Supporter
Oct 15, 2004
5,826
441
Back
✟110,503.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Not my style of worship- I prefer etheria an ambient music although I do love a good cathdral choirs plain chant.
This was their worship style. It seems to be drawing from Charismatic/Pentecostal spiritual sources and yes that will be very odd if its not your spiritual home.

HOWEVER and this is a very big however- this clip did not include the Eucharist itself, it was not the preperation of the table let alone the eucharist paryer itself. I suspect they are using the UK Common Worship Eucharist rather than the BCP given the group of people present.

To comply with Canon Law and be allowed to hold this as Eucharist I can assure you none would tinker with the actual Eucharist itself which is part of the service. We do have a college of liturgists and whilst they are adaptable as liturgy should be about helping people to gather together to worship God with honesty and integrity for them the Eucharist is a sacrement in the CofE and respected as such.

You can use whatever worship music you like for hymns and songs either side of the actual Eucharist including Christian Metal or Wesleys hymns or Kendricks Praise as long as it helps the congregation gathered to enter into the liminal space to meet and leave from God.

Are these the best muscians I have heard- nope but then I have also heard church organs that badly need tuning and choirs that make the birds on the roof take flight too. If I have to be in service susing such sorts of music I make use of ear plugs- my personal cringe is Kendrick's banal praise songs but I put up with them as I know many in the congregations find them helpful and I will not take form anyone something that helps them to have a constructive growing relationship with God.

Its not my personal music taste- it would be exceptionally rare for any service to offer that.
I cannot say it is anything more than an example of charismatic worship you can find in some Evangelical/Charismatic CofE churches.
You cannot say it is about people rather than God base don a short IMHO not my taste worship clip without trying to build a relationship with the congregation concerned. That would be as wise as saying anyone who treats this as Mass using bells, smells albs and chausables is placing the drama over the spiritual aspect too.
 
Upvote 0
Dec 8, 2011
289
11
Brisbane
✟30,493.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Nothing Wrong with it. The Mass has always followed popular musical trends through History.

I wouldn't like this personally cause I'm a snob who likes Baroque/Renaissance/Gregorian music fine vestments, Latin and Elizabethan English...and anything else is just pedestrian.

that being said however if someone doesn't get anything out of it, then it is pointless...God has to touch people on their own level.
I'm pleased God is present at these Mass's....cause I wouldn't be for all the all the jewels in Christendom! lol
 
Upvote 0

AndrewRD

Reformed Catholic
Jan 23, 2012
43
1
Jackson, Mississippi
✟30,170.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
So long as the actual Eucharistic portion of the service followed the prayer book, and the elements were properly consecrated and served by an ordained priest, the service is valid.

Now granted, this might be a perfectly validly service that is appallingly garish and perhaps a little too centered on the congregation rather than God for my tastes... but hey, a valid service nonetheless.
 
Upvote 0

MKJ

Contributor
Jul 6, 2009
12,260
776
East
✟38,894.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
So long as the actual Eucharistic portion of the service followed the prayer book, and the elements were properly consecrated and served by an ordained priest, the service is valid.

Now granted, this might be a perfectly validly service that is appallingly garish and perhaps a little too centered on the congregation rather than God for my tastes... but hey, a valid service nonetheless.

I think though the question is whether the minimum of validity is really what we should be reaching for.
 
Upvote 0

Timothy

Mad Anglican geek at large
Jan 1, 2004
8,055
368
Birmingham.... [Bur-min'-um]
✟32,765.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I don't have a problem with the principles that I presume fed the worship, but based on that short clip I find the execution flawed on a variety of levels.

Agreed. It's not to my taste, and there's a number of things I would personally change musically (I do NOT like distorted acoustic, if you're doing that sort of music, use an electric guitar for goodness sake! Even a cheap strat-clone would sound better) and a number of things I would change liturgically, but I still recognise that it's a matter of taste.
 
Upvote 0

MKJ

Contributor
Jul 6, 2009
12,260
776
East
✟38,894.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I do not think you have "levels" of validity. The Eucharist is valid or not.

I didn't say anything about levels of validity. But validity is not the only issue. What are we doing when we gather for public worship? The minimum we need to make it count? Or are we really offering God the best we can with our heart and soul and mind.

The whole idea that the minimum is what we should concentrate on is wrongheaded IMO. What is the least we need to believe to be saved? What is the least we need to do to be saved? What is the bare minimum we need to offer of ourselves?

Instead what we should be asking, as far as we can, what is the fullness of truth? How can I offer God everything that I have and am? How can I keep all his commandments? What is the maximum, the best we can offer in public worship?
 
Upvote 0