Super-Continent Pangaea

[joshua 1 9]

Why just the focus on Pangaea?

The issue with Pangaea has to do with carnivorous devouring each other. There are people that believe this is the work of Satan and not the a part of God's plan.

 

[Cearbhall]

The issue with Pangaea has to do with carnivorous devouring each other.

...clearly I missed something.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Your belief would have us accept that science is to be used to judge the truthfulness of scripture.

Science is used to help us to understand and to interpret scripture. The Bible takes on a fresh new meaning for each and ever generation.

 

[Cearbhall]

Science is used to help us to understand and to interpret scripture.

Right. Showing us which parts were literal and which were literature.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Right. Showing us which parts were literal and which were literature.

If people have a name then they are real people.

 

[Cearbhall]

If people have a name then they are real people.

Then Santa owes me a lot of gifts.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Science shows us that the Bible is accurate and true.

You started a thread a few days ago claiming this same thing. Science PROVES the BIBLE!!!11 That thread is up to I believe 27 pages and there is not a single shred of support for this claim in that entire thread from you. Just assertions and claims and preaching about the reprobate mind. Stop telling us about how great your evidence is and just lay it out already.

 

[florida2]

The issue with Pangaea has to do with carnivorous devouring each other. There are people that believe this is the work of Satan and not the a part of God's plan.

Wait, what?

We're talking about supercontinents which are formed by the gradual movement of tectonic plates over millions of years. Nothing about carnivores.

You accept Pangaea as a fact, it seems. Well, those same geologists list other supercontinents which have existed. How do you explain them except as a natural tectonic process?

 

[Jimmy D]

The issue with Pangaea has to do with carnivorous devouring each other. There are people that believe this is the work of Satan and not the a part of God's plan.

Who believes this?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

If people have a name then they are real people.

So every fictional character ever written existed?
Can you not see a fault in your logic? Or do you just immediately type out what comes to mind without thinking it through?

 

[Shemjaza]

The issue with Pangaea has to do with carnivorous devouring each other. There are people that believe this is the work of Satan and not the a part of God's plan.

Oh I remember this... did you ever make up an excuse for all the carnivores that existed before Pangaea?

Dunkleosteus is a good example.

 

[[serious]]

Really by liberal I mean the atheists. Science shows us that the Bible is accurate and true. SO in order to be an atheist then you have to reject true science.

Um, what?

At a certain point, you need to consult a dictionary so you know what words mean.

Religious people can be liberal, atheists can be conservative, and all 4 can be scientifically literate.

Unless science also has some nonstandard meaning to you...

 

[joshua 1 9]

Religious people can be liberal, atheists can be conservative, and all 4 can be scientifically literate.

They can but we are talking about the people that reject Science. It is the conservative and liberal extremists that seem to show the least about of tolerance. The moderates tend to show more tolerance.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Oh I remember this... did you ever make up an excuse for all the carnivores that existed before Pangaea?

Really they had teeth before Pangaea? Perhaps you could give me an example of just what species had teeth to devour before the dinosaurs. The school kids would be thrilled to hear what you have to say about that. Maybe Steven Spielberg would pay you for the rights to make a movie about it.

 

[Jimmy D]

Really they had teeth before Pangaea? Perhaps you could give me an example of just what species had teeth to devour before the dinosaurs. The school kids would be thrilled to hear what you have to say about that. Maybe Steven Spielberg would pay you for the rights to make a movie about it.

Are you joking? Pangaea existed during the late paleozoic and early mesozoic eras.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Really they had teeth before Pangaea? Perhaps you could give me an example of just what species had teeth to devour before the dinosaurs. The school kids would be thrilled to hear what you have to say about that. Maybe Steven Spielberg would pay you for the rights to make a movie about it.

Dunkleosteus, lived in the Late Devonian period around 360-380 million years ago. It's entire upper jaw was a tooth.

 

[-57]

Science is used to help us to understand and to interpret scripture. The Bible takes on a fresh new meaning for each and ever generation.

Provided your science is correct.

 

[Shemjaza]

Really they had teeth before Pangaea? Perhaps you could give me an example of just what species had teeth to devour before the dinosaurs. The school kids would be thrilled to hear what you have to say about that. Maybe Steven Spielberg would pay you for the rights to make a movie about it.

...that is a bizarre mocking tone for a person who just cropped my example off my initial post.

But as Warden_of_the_Storm and I both just said: Dunkleosteus

 

[joshua 1 9]

...that is a bizarre mocking tone for a person who just cropped my example off my initial post.

I may use sarcasm but for the most part I just use language that is easy for people to understand for communication purpose.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I may use sarcasm but for the most part I just use language that is easy for people to understand for communication purpose.

And yet you are ignoring the fact the myself and Shemjaza have answered your question about animals having teeth before the split of Pangaea, and have even given you links to the creature in question: the Dunkleosteus.