• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Hmmm... Then the Apostle Paul is a replacement theologist too, as is Jesus Himself, therefore I am in very good company.

The letter to the Hebrews is inspired and infallible as is the rest of the New Testament. Perhaps others can choose not to believe this, but I am unable to believe otherwise.

As far as issues with Judaism...of course I have issues with Judaism! My personal belief is that any Judaic theology, at the very least, has no place on a Christian board. Of course I believe that the phrase Christian Sabbath is an oxymoron.

In order for the assertions I made in my previous post to be false, the Scriptures I referred to have to be in error...but they're not.
 
Upvote 0

muffler dragon

Ineffable
Apr 7, 2004
7,320
382
50
✟31,896.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
JustinWindsor said:
Hmmm... Then the Apostle Paul is a replacement theologist too, as is Jesus Himself, therefore I am in very good company.

When I get my Replacement Theology and Anti-Semitism thread re-instated, I'll be sure to look you up. I'm sure you have a lot in common with Church Fathers regarding your consideration of the Jews.

JW said:
The letter to the Hebrews is inspired and infallible as is the rest of the New Testament. Perhaps others can choose not to believe this, but I am unable to believe otherwise.

Yeah... so inspired no one knows who wrote it. But wait... I thought authorship was a criterium for canonicity? Hmmm... interesting. Maybe it was the agenda it presented.

JW said:
As far as issues with Judaism...of course I have issues with Judaism! My personal belief is that any Judaic theology, at the very least, has no place on a Christian board.

Interesting. A man who so despises the "supposed" root of his faith. You and Marcion would have had some great discussions at the dinner table.

JW said:
Of course I believe that the phrase Christian Sabbath is an oxymoron.

I don't believe you should honor the Sabbath. As far as oxymorons go, well... I'll just leave that for now.

JW said:
In order for the assertions I made in my previous post to be false, the Scriptures I referred to have to be in error...but they're not.

Destroying the inerrancy and infallibility of your "New" Testament Scriptures might be a little bit too much for you to handle. But at least, you've got your traditions.
 
Upvote 0

D.W.

Contributor
May 24, 2004
6,233
2,468
75
Wisconsin
✟18,422.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Shalom JustinWindsor,

The things you write are hard to understand since Paul that you praise was first Jewish and also a member of the Sanhedrin. He also followed the Law.Try reading Acts 21:20-26. Also That Jewish Christ, Jesus also kept the Law and told us to do likewise.

G-d Bless,
Dan
 
Upvote 0

The Thadman

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2002
1,783
59
✟2,318.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
JustinWindsor said:
(snip) Any message that attempts to replace the work of the cross in any way is a serious error standing opposed to the gospel brought by Christ and explained clearly by the Apostles.

The "work of the cross"? The cross isn't special. Millions of people, Jews and Gentiles died on a cross at the hands of the Roman government. It was a fate saved for political threats and people meant to be made an example of. Just think, how would Jesus feel if he were looking at how the cross has become an object of worship and reverence over the years?

Jesus could not have been a sin sacrifice. The Torah makes that clear


I would not stone Jesus. I like his message, just a message that most mainstream Christians that I have seen seek to destroy: Torah alone.

What is the truth about the OT sabbaths? It was a sign of the Covenant between the LORD and His covenant nation Israel.

But the Sabbath is meant for -everyone- who follows YHWH:



“When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.” (Heb 8:13)

Then Jesus was a liar when he said:


The last time I checked, the "Second Coming" hasn't happened yet, therefore according to the lips of Jesus, the Torah is still to be abided by.



He was referring to the forming Mishnah, not the Mosaic Law. See above.


This is one of the most misunderstood verses in the entire Bible. This was not an argument to not observe the Diet, Feasts, Rosh HaKhodeshim, and Sabbaths.

At the time of Jesus and Paul there were many forms an sects of Judaism: Pharisees, Saducees, and Essenes just to name the three most famous. Each one of them had their own seperate traditions concerning these things, and they had horrible arguments about them. To quote myself from another post:


The Saducees had a beef with this, as did the Essenes. It was to such a point that they even celebrated holidays and new moons on different days under different conditions. To this day, Rabbinic Jews and Karaites use a different calendar. Where Rabbinic JEws followed a calculated calendar instated by Hillel II and celebrated Passover last weekend, Karaites, like myself, follow the Biblical luni-solar calendar, based upon the ripening of Barley in Jerusalem as commanded by God, and we celebrated Passover last lunar month.

In summary, there was never a debate as whether or not to OBSERVE these commandments, but there was a debate and problem over HOW. Paul was saying "Don't worry about how! Let's get along!"


I've already dealt with this.


The Law CANNOT be a yoke of bondage. YHWH, himself says so:


The ORAL LAW, however, is an unnecessary yoke that Paul and Peter didn't want to trouble the Gentiles with. Torah Alone.

Faith comes first, ALWAYS, but if one has faith one will keep the standard that God expects of us.


I've already dealt with all of the above.

If you have faith in Christ alone, you are redeemed by His blood. If you do not have faith in Christ alone, you are condemned by the ministry of death.

I believe that one should have faith WITH Jesus. The faith OF Jesus, not a faith about Jesus.


1) ~Blink blink blink~ Who will pick up a stone against you?

2) The trinity is not spelled out in the Bible and "hints" are not solid grounds for doctrine.

3) According to Jesus, not all has happened, therefore the Torah is still in effect.

Peace,
-Steve-o
 
Upvote 0

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
he met Jesus on the Damascus road.



 
Upvote 0

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
...very special to me. Jesus died once for all.

There are certain things which, to me are non-negotiable in Christianity. The virgin birth, the incarnation, the work of the cross, the resurrection. The full humanity of Jesus. The full diety of Jesus. The revelation of our Triune God.

Without the new covenant in Christ's blood, there is no Christianity.

Truth, by its very nature, is exclusive. There is only one truth. We may disagree on what that truth is, but there is only one.

There is only one path to salvation, faith alone, in Christ alone. You may label it what you will. I will label it truth.
 
Upvote 0

The Thadman

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2002
1,783
59
✟2,318.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
JustinWindsor said:
...very special to me. Jesus died once for all.

There are certain things which, to me are non-negotiable in Christianity.

Well then at least let me tell you where I stand:

The virgin birth,

If Jesus was born of a virgin, then he would not have the genealogy to be the Messiah, so to believe that story is to deny his Messiahship.

the incarnation,

See below.

the work of the cross,

The only "work of the cross" I see was making Jesus a martyr at the hands of the Roman Empire.

the resurrection.

We do agree at least on one point. I, personally, believe that Jesus did resurrect as an example to those who didn't believe in a resurrection (i.e. Saducees).

The full humanity of Jesus.

Agreed once more. He was bar 'nashâ' (a son of man, human).

The full diety of Jesus.

I cannot agree as God is not man, nor the son of man, human. The Torah makes that painfully clear. In substance, man and God are incompatible.

The revelation of our Triune God.

Once again I can only quote the Torah and say YHWH echad, YHWH is one.

Without the new covenant in Christ's blood, there is no Christianity.

I must also disagree on the grounds of what Jesus, himself, taught. His message, imho, was that of the Kingdom of God, not the kingdoms of men. He demonstrated that one must rise up against those who hold traditions up and above God's Word, the truth about faith, and the truth of the resurrection. Every debate with the Pharisees and Saducees illustrates that, as well as every parable.


And in Christ alone, he taught Torah, and nothing other (which includes Friday/Saturday Sabbath observance). To remove Torah from his message would be to spit in his face.

Peace!
-Steve-o
 
Upvote 0

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I'm Christian...

Thank you Thadman, we know exactly where you stand. For you, the Torah... Jesus was not who He said He was, nor was He who the Apostles said He was, nor was His finished work of the cross what the Apostles said it was.

For me...Jesus is exactly who He claims to be, exactly who the Apostles say He is, and the work of the cross, as explained clearly by the Apostles, means everything.

There's not much use in me quoting any more New Testament Scripture here, as you don't accept it as inspired and infallible.
 
Upvote 0

muffler dragon

Ineffable
Apr 7, 2004
7,320
382
50
✟31,896.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
I guess a defense of your position in this thread will not be forthcoming.

I'll go ahead and NOT expect you to come to my thread to defend Replacement Theology.

Good thing. I normally require substantiation when in a discussion.
 
Upvote 0

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
“But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” (Rom 3:21-26)
 
Upvote 0

D.W.

Contributor
May 24, 2004
6,233
2,468
75
Wisconsin
✟18,422.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
JustinWindsor said:
he met Jesus on the Damascus road.
Shalom Justin Windsor,
Were those gentile sacrifices that Paul made in the Jewish synagogue after he met the Jewish Christ on that road? Also did the Jewish Christ give up being Jewish at that same point in time? Do you realy believe such nonsense?
Could you please show me in scripture where you think Paul gave up his heritage.

G-d Bless,
Dan
 
Upvote 0

muffler dragon

Ineffable
Apr 7, 2004
7,320
382
50
✟31,896.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
D.W.:

I'm under the impression that Justin doesn't care about "substantiation" as much as he does "soap-boxing".

Good questions.

m.d.
 
Upvote 0

muffler dragon

Ineffable
Apr 7, 2004
7,320
382
50
✟31,896.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
JustinWindsor said:
Using a "Christian" forum to forward Jewish Theology is not soapboxing I suppose?!

Soapboxing is a matter of speaking simply to be heard without substantiation. Exactly what you have been doing the entire time.

JW said:
With regards to substantiation...I would be interested to hear your response to the passage from Romans above.

I'll make a deal with you. I'll answer the consideration of the Romans passage and you come over to my Replacement Theology thread in Liberal Theology and defend your pro- stance. I'll expect to see you there.

Now for my part:

Romans 3:21-26
But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

Just to let you know: I'm not big on people just using Scripture alone in a reply post. Try adding some commentary.

I'll go ahead and address it piece by piece:

1) But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe

I don't believe one has to have faith in Jesus in order to be "right with G-d". By the way, when and if you want to discuss the legitimacy of Paul, give me a hollar.

2) for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God

I can agree with this statement. Everyone sins.

3) being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus

I can't agree with this one. According to 2 Chronicles 7:14, repentance brings forth forgiveness; nothing else is added.

4) whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith

I don't believe that the crucifixion was a "sin offering" according to Leviticus. Therefore, the death of Jesus was simply a political execution.

5) This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

Since I don't agree with 3 of the 4 former points, I'm sure you understand why I find Paul's conclusion faulty.

See you in my Replacement Theology thread.
 
Upvote 0

JustinWindsor

Active Member
Mar 28, 2005
386
19
63
✟23,116.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
You've clearly stated that you disagree with the Apostle Paul's teaching. Therefore, as observed previously, you don't accept the New Testament as inspired and infallible. In the absence of that presupposition being shared by us both, continuing in this debate, or in your 'replacement theology' debate would be quite useless.

I believe the Apostles when they say that there is no other gospel except the one we've been given through them. You don't.

May God Bless you richly.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.