• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Subtle but effective

The happy Objectivist

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2020
909
274
58
Center
✟73,419.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The great majority of people in many countries agree with that - and consider that the actions taken by governments in response to COVID outbreaks in their countries were in their best interests. Without the restrictions the pandemic would, in most people's opinion, have been worse.

All the democratic countries in the world which imposed COVID related restrictions on their populations have subsequently removed them in a timely fashion. Even China, which has imposed the most stringent restrictions, has removed them when it considered it to be safe to do so. And with obvious good reason - such restrictions are bad for their economies.

All this malarkey about evil governments stealing our liberties is just silly.
So, the fact that many people agree is irrelevant when we're talking about principles. A whole lot of the Germans agreed with killing the Jews. I'm not going to try and convince you that some in government want to take away your freedom because it will be clear and irrefutable very soon. Yes, there are many people who are perfectly willing to have their freedoms abridged in order to obtain some perceived benefit. Many are perfectly happy for the government to take money from those who earned it and give it to those who didn't. Doesn't make it right.

I suppose you have no problem with the weaponization of the FBI against political opponents either. Will you "own nothing and be happy"? Will you be alright with a digital currency controlled by them? Are you OK with a Chinese-style social credit system? These are serious questions because all of these things are real.
 
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So, the fact that many people agree is irrelevant when we're talking about principles. A whole lot of the Germans agreed with killing the Jews. I'm not going to try and convince you that some in government want to take away your freedom because it will be clear and irrefutable very soon. Yes, there are many people who are perfectly willing to have their freedoms abridged in order to obtain some perceived benefit. Many are perfectly happy for the government to take money from those who earned it and give it to those who didn't. Doesn't make it right.

I suppose you have no problem with the weaponization of the FBI against political opponents either. Will you "own nothing and be happy"? Will you be alright with a digital currency controlled by them? Are you OK with a Chinese-style social credit system? These are serious questions because all of these things are real.

Ah, principles! If there is a principle to justify the COVID restrictions it can be found in the utilitarianism of Dewar and Jeremy Bentham. Its roots will be in Epicurus, I suppose. I believe that the restrictions were pragmatic. Lives were undoubtedly saved and suffering reduced. The cost was a temporary loss of liberty, now fully restored.

In Britain the population endured numerous deprivations including conscription, the blackout, food and petrol rationing - all real assaults on personal liberty. The lesson to be taken from this is that limits on personal freedom are sometimes necessary for the greater good. The guide must be a sense of shared struggle; this sense was apparent during the War and equally during the darkest days of the pandemic. There was also a realistic expectation that the restrictions would be lifted when their necessity had reduced; this happened in every democracy I can think of.

There is no principle worth anything which sets individual liberty above all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Enilorac
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I have lost faith in most of my fellow Americans, and consider them as heathens.

It is not the heathens you should be worrying about.

I am a heathen, and I pose no threat! Here is a good definition of a modern heathen. I invite you to check whether there are so many Americans that fit the definition and to see how dangerous we are!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,699
6,206
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,123,151.00
Faith
Atheist
It is not the heathens you should be worrying about.

I am a heathen, and I pose no threat! Here is a good definition of a modern heathen. I invite you to check whether there are so many Americans that fit the definition and to see how dangerous we are!
You forgot the definition.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,486
20,772
Orlando, Florida
✟1,515,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
It is not the heathens you should be worrying about.

I am a heathen, and I pose no threat! Here is a good definition of a modern heathen. I invite you to check whether there are so many Americans that fit the definition and to see how dangerous we are!

You aren't an American.

Heathen has the connotation in the US of somebody barbaric and uncultured.
 
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You aren't an American.

Heathen has the connotation in the US of somebody barbaric and uncultured.

Ah, yes! As Churchill put it: two nations divided by a common language.

From the introduction of The Heathen Manifesto by Julian Baggini, an English philosopher:

Heathens are not merely unbelievers: we believe many things too. Most importantly, we believe in naturalism: the natural world is all there is and there is no purposive, conscious agency that created or guides it. This natural world may contain many mysteries and even unseen dimensions, but we have no reason to believe that they are anything like the heavens, spirit worlds and deities that have characterised supernatural religious beliefs over history.

That is what I meant - nothing barbaric or uncultured here, as you have so perspicaciously observed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaara4158
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You forgot the definition.

Woops!

I was looking for Julian Baggini's definition and then got sidetracked. See#53 above.

Here is a bit more of the same:

Our first commitment is to the truth

... a commitment to see the world as truthfully as we can, using our rational faculties as best we can, based on the best evidence we have. That is where our primary commitment lies, not the conclusions we reach. Hence we are prepared to accept the possibility that we are wrong. It also means that we respect and have much in common with people who come to very different conclusions but have an equal respect for truth, reason and evidence. A heathen has more in common with a sincere, rational, religious truth-seeker than an atheist whose lack of belief is unquestioned, or has become unquestionable.

See how the last sentence separates Baggini (and many other atheist, including me) from the militant atheists in the same camp as Richard Dawkins.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Over the last 2.5 years little has changed in my life. I did not miss the bars, theatres, and public social interaction. Wearing a mask at the local grocer was no setback. I was not isolated and went about my routine of travelling around my native area exploring and taking photos, which is a solitary endeavour anyway.

However, my question is... how many of you, especially if barely inconvenienced, have felt you have still subtly been brainwashed into being wary of fellow man and the old freedoms we took for granted all our lives. Are you as comfortable as you once were in going about your daily life or has something been taken away?
I feel that I have lost nothing and gained quite a bit. Food and certain retail services now offer contactless delivery options, which is wonderful. I just got a cold for the first time in 3 years this week, which I attribute to the ubiquity of masks in public until recently. Work from home infrastructure has been developed by necessity, which helps to lighten traffic for those of us who work on-site. People in public now make a conscious effort to keep their distance from one another, which is another boon both for my health and my preference not to be subjected to other people’s body odors. Things are simply better now in a handful of ways and I find it baffling that some people feel a sense of loss with these changes.
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,876
20,147
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,715,012.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Just wondering if anyone has been noticing things are not as free and easy psychologically as before.

If I notice anything, it's that people are tired. Our personal resources have been stretched beyond reason and our resilience has been exhausted. Creative thinking, new initiatives and anything out of the normal routine are too hard. I see it in my community and I see it in myself.

I don't think this amounts to anything intentional on anyone's part - I think governments etc. have been doing their best (not always doing well) in unprecedented and trying circumstances - but it does beg questions of how we recover, and where to from here.

As to whether I've gained or lost over the pandemic, for me personally it's been a bit of both. Overall I do feel that I've lost through restriction of opportunities, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Just when we thought it is all over, my grandson has tested positive for Covid this morning. The whole family, aunts and uncles cousins and grandparents, were together for a birthday party so we are all exposed.

As far as I can tell, nobody has gained anything worth having, but the idea expressed in the OP that there was an element of control in government's efforts to restrict the pandemic is absurd and wicked.
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,696
40
Hong Kong
✟188,696.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
If I notice anything, it's that people are tired. Our personal resources have been stretched beyond reason and our resilience has been exhausted. Creative thinking, new initiatives and anything out of the normal routine are too hard. I see it in my community and I see it in myself.

I don't think this amounts to anything intentional on anyone's part - I think governments etc. have been doing their best (not always doing well) in unprecedented and trying circumstances - but it does beg questions of how we recover, and where to from here.

As to whether I've gained or lost over the pandemic, for me personally it's been a bit of both. Overall I do feel that I've lost through restriction of opportunities, at least.

Here in China we are not exhausted or strained beyond
whatever.
But then we've been through privation, war, turmoil, invasion
and disaster so far beyond anything ever experienced
in the USA, Canada, Oz, we would have to be a tough resilient
people just to survive.
 
Upvote 0