Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The guy who wrote that was a Christian. He accepted Scripture. Your personal incredulity is noted.
But will you admit that as far as the bible itself goes, the lifespan change is best seen as being most affected in Peleg's day?
My point exactly! Once we know what is going on, we do not need to explain it with long periods of snowing.Only to the uneducated.
Says who? You got nothing on the great snow making event. Who says it was not flood water that was rapidly changed in the former state?And only the uneducated would make such a claim.
False. That is your belief system on ice! Cheers.The hundreds of thousands of years of ice are marked by annual differences in temperature. And marker beds of volcanic eruptions that allow those layers to be dated.
I do not call God's word to man a fairy tale.What do you have that supports your fairy tale?
It mentions a changed world. The book is a bestseller also. So it is fresh and hot off the press daily.If you have nothing but a moldy old book written by men that does not even mention polar ice you have nothing.
But how much did JRR accept??Just because someone is a Christian does not mean that he accepts all scripture.
You know one. Me.In fact I do not know of any Christians that do. Sooner or later even the staunchest are offended by some part of their Bible.
Jesus was! So were all the early Christians. So is every bible believer today.So I will grant that Tolkien was a Christian. No one has given any evidence that he is a creationist.
All bible believers are. Now when we have Christians that are not bible believers, I suggest they are not yet perfect.I guess it is necessary to point out that most Christians in the world are not creationists.
My point exactly! Once we know what is going on, we do not need to explain it with long periods of snowing.
Says who? You got nothing on the great snow making event. Who says it was not flood water that was rapidly changed in the former state?
False. That is your belief system on ice! Cheers.
I do not call God's word to man a fairy tale.
It mentions a changed world. The book is a bestseller also. So it is fresh and hot off the press daily.
But how much did JRR accept??
You know one. Me. Jesus was! So were all the early Christians. So is every bible believer today.
I would hardly call Bible believers perfect. They are incredibly flawed. If the Bible has truths it is better to believe them rather than the obvious nonsense in your book.All bible believers are. Now when we have Christians that are not bible believers, I suggest they are not yet perfect.
Just because someone is a Christian does not mean that he accepts all scripture. In fact I do not know of any Christians that do. Sooner or later even the staunchest are offended by some part of their Bible.
So I will grant that Tolkien was a Christian. No one has given any evidence that he is a creationist. I guess it is necessary to point out that most Christians in the world are not creationists.
Since science doesn't know the state of the past, we can say the same of the ice age.In the case of your pile of snow, yes.
Better to snip out a relevant quote. Post the link for support, in case someone suspects you made up the quoteSays every scientist who has studied the ice of Antarctica and Greenland. I could link articles if you wish.
And if you cannot find evidence for your "present state past" then it is your "delusional state". I have the evidence of the bible. If you do not accept that evidence you are left with none at all.And if you cannot find evidence for your "former state" then I have already named it properly, it is your "delusional state".
None at all actually as we can see here. You just talk as if you have some.No, you do not know the meaning of the word "belief". I have evidence for my claims. So far you don't have any evidence that supports yours.
Opinion. The proofs of ages confirm it is God's word. That is not an issue at all.You don't have "God's word". You have a series of fables written by uneducated men. There is nothing to hint of the "divine" in their writings.
False.It seems that you are guilty of worshiping an idol. Your idol is the Bible. That still goes against the commandments of the God you claim to follow.
The books were written long before that council.He was a Catholic, and the official Catholic doctrine since Vatican II was acceptance of evolution, although it was written that Tolkien didn't like some of the Vatican II reforms (notable saying prayers in English instead of Latin), but I don't know where he stood in respect to creation/evolution.
Who cares.Who knows.
If I lived in ancient Israel and was a believer, of course I would have to abide by the law.So if you had a daughter, and somebody raped her, as long as he paid you say $500.00 and married her it would be okay with you.
True. But we can say that the Christians who do not believe the bible are not perfect!I would hardly call Bible believers perfect. They are incredibly flawed. If the Bible has truths it is better to believe them rather than the obvious nonsense in your book.
Gong. No one that I am aware dates the bible we have back to Noah!The dating methods corroborated by the radiometric dating are the exact same methods you use to date things in the Bible: Written records say X happened such-and-such years before Y.
Helps you have a case of some sort that is semi cohesive.
You have not so much as a case?? Well, at least work toward getting a point one day. Get back to us if you make it.A case towards what? Who said anything about a case?
You have not so much as a case?? Well, at least work toward getting a point one day. Get back to us if you make it.
Great, so what is your question? I have one...do you have a case regarding the issues at hand here? Or at least some point?I'm just asking questions. Answers would be nice. Manners cost nothing.
Why must I have a 'case'? Why can't I just ask you some simple questions? Why so combative?Great, so what is your question? I have one...do you have a case regarding the issues at hand here? Or at least some point?
Ok, so before this tangent, you mentioned asteroids. What about them exactly?Why must I have a 'case'? Why can't I just ask you some simple questions? Why so combative?
Tell us a bit about dampening times and how these could apply here? I would think that if almost all of them came about as a result of either the flood or the state change, that the times that they do stuff would be relative?How does your state change affect their dampening times?
Tell us a bit about dampening times and how these could apply here? I would think that if almost all of them came about as a result of either the flood or the state change, that the times that they do stuff would be relative?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?