GenetoJean
Veteran
- Jun 25, 2012
- 2,807
- 140
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Oops, I quoted the wrong post. I will have to fix that.
Kk, fixed. I was referring to the passages from Romans 1:18-32.
Upvote
0
not specific which is the punishment ?
not marry or homosexual?
as for god making ppl some way
that happened at the beginning
many family abuse sits and psychological factos like single parents drugs poverty make ppl what they are, different from original creation you think ?
Sounds like you go to the wrong Church. I don't see my Church or the other Christians there like that at all. They would definitely have a problem with those things you listed such as Divorce. Isn't it okay to have a problem with those things and to also have a problem with homosexuality. That isn't hypocrisy. I have said all along that those other sins are wrong as well.
How about the idea that the state, together with the man and woman is a party to the marriage? This gives a whole new meaning to being in bed with the state! To press the metaphor further, this logically means they have a legal claim to the progeny of that agreement. This is why the state is justified in using force against godly Christian families (eg. homeschooling issues). The parents voluntarily gave authority over their children by making the State a party to the contract that produced them. It is time to recognize paganism for what it is. Let's go further. It's time to stop acting like pagan state worshipers when it comes to marriage. Since marriage is a picture of Christ's intimate union with his bride, the Church, inviting any other into this lawful union profanes and adulterates it. In so doing we present a false gospel picture to the world and to ourselves.
Marriage is not a contract designed for convenience. It is not the property of the state. It is indeed ordained for three parties but we dare not substitute the "state" for our Lord, Jesus Christ. There is no biblical justification for Christian participation in marriage licenses and contracts. They are pagan to the core. They testify to the "god-state", not to the reality of Christ's relationship to his Church.
I think that we should all be praying and praying hard for the protection of marriage. I strongly recommend the Rosary as well as the Divine Mercy Chaplet.
marriage of cana
this old news to me, about 30yrs old
so did jsus and magda have a licence?
didnt you post about how things like homosex are natural
cause theyre found in nature
black widows murder their mates after mating
should mankind [kind men] behave that way ?
hope u read the links.
I wonder if the same prayers were made when the pursuit for the right to interracial marriage was an issue?I think that we should all be praying and praying hard for the protection of marriage. I strongly recommend the Rosary as well as the Divine Mercy Chaplet.
I wonder if the same prayers were made when the pursuit for the right to interracial marriage was an issue?
And what about atheists entering into marriage?
I think that we should all be praying and praying hard for the protection of marriage. I strongly recommend the Rosary as well as the Divine Mercy Chaplet.
Actually there's controversy because Josephus claimed she was Cushite and that they were Ethiopians. Bible scholars tend to conflict on that issue.I love when that's brought up, because the alleged "Biblical" issue with interracial marriage came from an inference, rather than direct Scripture, and anyway, Moses was married to an Ethipian woman.
Of course, the laws may change but the mind's seldom follow.Genesis 24:3 And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell:
Genesis 9:18
And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
I wonder if the same prayers were made when the pursuit for the right to interracial marriage was an issue?
And what about atheists entering into marriage?
Because if one wants to protect a Christian Marriage, which is what some people are saying then why allow any type of NON Christian marriage.Why do you make the comparison? Homosexual is SAME SEX and not comparable in my mind.
Because if one wants to protect a Christian Marriage, which is what some people are saying then why allow any type of NON Christian marriage.
he was also forbidden to enter the promised land
where joshua executed total genocide at jerico
perhaps to protect genetic purity ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?