Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If it would not have been able to fail, then Jesus wouldn't have had to pray.
Why would I pray for you to pass an exam, if it were already established that you could not fail it? No prayer is necessary.
Sorry?I am called to service and although I am the least of the children of men I have been vested with the very power and Word of the Lord. And I cannot be stopped in this endeavor. Your intellect is like dry leaves at my naked feet to be carried away by the wind. I am His voice speaking in the darkness. A fragile reed that shall go unbroken.
Make that 3.No problem, Mr. G. I do want to say again that it is pleasant for two people like you and I, who are both pretty passionate about our take on things, to be able to disagree without getting fed up with each other. We're getting to plumb some depths that are usually too deep to go because the emotions get in the way. It's been a fun ride.
Well than, your a false prophet.
Why would you make such a prideful statement?
True. But, of course, according to Calvinism these means cannot be used to convince or draw the unregenerate toward Christ because they will reject them every time.
]Satan was going to sift Peter. The events of the night and the pointed accusations of, arent you one of them, pressured Peter to the point of rejecting Christ three times. Jesus told Peter this was going to happen. But, beyond this failure of faith (which was a failure to a degree), it is implied that Peters faith could have failed outright, but Jesus prayed that this would not happen (implying that it could), and He knew Peter would return and stated, when you return. [/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]
Yes, God had to intervene on behalf of Peters faith. Again, I find it interesting that God would have to step in to help his faith. It helps us to see the nature of this gift that God has given. It can go up and down, be weak or strong, little or great, and as suggested even fail, etc. Also, it was through the means of events and outside secondary influences that caused his faith to fail to a degree. I guess we need to ask, could he have stood strong in the faith and not denied Christ? I think he could have, but Jesus knew he wouldnt (Job did). So, as I see it, we are not told how God sustained Peters faith, which I agree with you He did, but I would submit the means by which it was done was most likely secondary, outward, and resistible, but Praise God influential and effective.
The gift of faith is really the gift of the Spirit.
Not sure exactly what you mean here. You are not referring to the baptism of the Spirit are you? Or, trying to establish an order?
Genuine faith is His fruit, after all.
Faith(fulness) is the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5).
I'm either being influenced by the Spirit or I'm being influenced by the sin in me. The Spirit is using every moment of my life (and everything that comes with that moment) as a means of grace, or I'm being left to myself. Most of the time it is a combination of both. All of it is for my good, and all of it is for God's glory, and its imperfect operation is part of God's perfect plan for our being made perfect.
Amen. However, not to the point of being puppets. We have a will. It is a fight of faith. We wrestle with these things.
Every circumstance, every physical particle, and every spiritual blessing is a part of the means God uses for those He loves. There isn't anything that isn't a means that the Spirit uses. There's no volume knob for grace or faith. There's simply Providence.
Amen. It is not an irresistible force that turns a knob up or down in us. And even, as you stated, Regeneration is not God pressing some impersonal button. But to me that is what the Calvinist version of regeneration looks like, a flip of the switch against the will of an unwilling stubborn and rebellious individual very impersonal.
We just see the encourager, the evangelist, the laborers, and everything else as being managed by God with the purpose and power and promise to succeed.
I agree here also. A beautiful orchestrated synergism for the Glory of ONE.
When I take my experience to the Bible I see, quite in black and white, that God did everything He needed to to win me over.
Amen. But again, even your verbiage of personal steps and being won over infers a convincing process toward Christ before regeneration. I don't understand this in light of Calvinisms understanding of Total Inability.
To imagine that I could've refused is laughable.
If you were led by revelation refusal was possible. If you were regenerated in order for all this to happen then you are right you could not have refused. It amazes me that some people who see God move in just as powerful and beautiful ways; they see it, acknowledge it, function in it, and yet they end up rejecting Him and He says of them I never knew. Can you imagine that some who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, would fall away and crucify the Son of God all over again; subjecting him to public disgrace (Heb 6:4-6)?
Hey Eddie L,
You said,
Then you need to reevaluate Calvinism. There is no button to wind us up and make us operate on our own. The term "regenerate" encompasses a lot of means and causes that the Spirit works in us that is unique for every person. What the Spirit did to regenerate me doesn't look like what He did to regenerate you.
I have to admit this view of regeneration is different than I have found in Calvinism forums. Most times the Inward Call is presented as an Inward Come Forth! Instantly producing life. Regeneration is simply presented as coming alive to enable faith and growth in Christ.
Any means and causes prior to regeneration are rejected. Any means and causes that effectively conform us to Christ only come after regeneration. So, what I am usually presented with as regeneration has always looked the same with no unique means because again any unique means would only be rejected.
It has always been presented to me as a kind of push of an inner button, Come Forth! Life results. Faith results from Life. This is 99% of the Calvinist thought Ive had to deal with. Of course they dont say inner button
Hey EddieL,
Great post.
You said,
My objection is that you think that God could purpose Himself to save a person through those means and that His purpose would fail.
I would not say that His purpose or means ever fail. The means are effective for the salvation of those He knows will receive His salvation, and the means are effective to display the greatness of His love, leaving those who will reject Him without excuse and deserving of greater punishment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?