• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Special Inward Call?

E

Eddie L

Guest
If it would not have been able to fail, then Jesus wouldn't have had to pray.

Why would I pray for you to pass an exam, if it were already established that you could not fail it? No prayer is necessary.

If it was up to man, there is no reason for Jesus to pray. Prayer is one of the means that God uses to pass the exam. His Spirit moving us to pray for another person is God connecting us to His sovereign plan for someone else. We know from the Bible that the Spirit leads us to pray. So, the Spirit leads us to pray because the Father decrees for Him to, then we respond and pray, and then the Father graciously answers that prayer. He has included us as a means of grace, purely because He loves us and wants us to share that experience.

This is an intimacy that looks like marriage. Maybe that's why He calls us the Bride.
 
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey Foghorn (my reply to #36),

I cannot help but think of the time when Jesus breathed on the apostles and said, receive the Holy Spirit, and sent them on a journey. When they returned, after asking who the people said He was, Peter confessed, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.

I think you may be combining two different events.

John 20:21-23, Again Jesus said, "Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you." 22 And with that he breathed on them and said, "Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven."

This is after the resurrection and before Pentecost. They had already believed upon Jesus and were already His followers, but the gift of the Spirit was soon going to abide in them and empower them to witness. I think Him breathing on them was either a sign of what would happen at Pentecost or a small portion of what would be fulfilled there.

Peter received the revelation that He is the Christ much earlier.

Now g, who's faith was this? Peter's right? based on what, him just knowing and making a free will choice that Jesus is the Son of the Living God? I think not.

I think it was Peter’s faith. Based on pages of Scripture. Based on personal pronouns, his, her, their faith. Based on the multiple commands that tell people to have faith without any indication that you can’t. It is expected for you to be able to believe. This is the understood position of Scripture. Now, you don’t think it was Peter’s faith? Based on what? I can think of a handful of verses that Calvinists use, but when pressed are not convincing.

But as Jesus said, flesh and blood has not reveled this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. Matt 16.


Amen. But, the realization came through, as the text says, a revelation not through regeneration.
Why don’t all these verses add the fact that it is by regeneration? They could if it was true, but they don’t. Jesus as a Calvinist should have said, “Flesh and blood has not regenerated you so you can understand this, but it was by being born of the Spirit that you came to this conclusion.” And then you have to ask, “Had Peter not been regenerated up until this point?” Hey, the Father revealed it, Peter acknowledged it… the text doesn’t go beyond that. I agree.

You see g, knowing Christ and having faith in Him is not in man.

The ability is within man, then when the living seed of the Word is introduced and the two are combined – watch out!

Knowing Christ and having faith in Him is from God, through regeneration and revelation. I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; Matt 16:18.

I would say, knowing Christ and having faith in Him is from God, through revelation and results in regeneration. The church is built upon a revelation, not regeneration, or election.

What is the church built on? Peter, and a free will choice? Or.

God revealing Christ and therefore Peter confessing? I say yes!

Amen!

Why did Jesus have to pray that Peters faith would not fail Him?

Here are my thoughts:

This is for our benefit, it is a reassurance that Christ is a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. He is our priest and intercessor, why would He not pray for us? He is faithful.

Why does He pray for us “for our faith not to fail,” if the faith given us were a genuine gift of God faith that cannot fail? And, yes He is faithful. But if the faith gift of God cannot fail this does not need to be a matter of intercession. Some Calvinist needs to let Jesus know that.

Also, this was before pentacost, and if I understand correctly, before Pentecost the Spirit did not stay continuously with believers. This is something Peter had to go through, and Jesus prayed for him, so how could it fail? Jesus even said, "when you return, not, if you return. I see a faithful God, indeed, a blessed assurance!

I agree. However, he was still in the very real peril of his faith failing, and that caused Jesus to intercede. If the faith couldn’t have failed, then the experience is mute. What is the lesson? Jesus prays for our faith not to fail, even though it could never fail anyway? Thanks I guess.

You can take this all the way back to the question, “Are the elect prior to belief in any real threat of perishing and do they really genuinely stand condemned?” If they are elect based on an unconditional election from before the foundation of the world and upon this basis they will be glorified, then they really never at any time stand condemned.

Instead Scripture teaches, “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.” - John 3:18

Then, on the other hand, if they are elected from the foundation of the world based upon a forseen belief in God’s provision of salvation, then prior to that belief, they actually and legitimately do stand condemned. I believe the basis for election is faith; faith is not the result of election. Again, if faith were the result of election, we would never really stand condemned. We would only be waiting for God to pop that gift of faith into us.
 
Upvote 0

Foghorn

Saved by grace
Mar 8, 2010
1,186
126
New England
Visit site
✟44,586.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am called to service and although I am the least of the children of men I have been vested with the very power and Word of the Lord. And I cannot be stopped in this endeavor. Your intellect is like dry leaves at my naked feet to be carried away by the wind. I am His voice speaking in the darkness. A fragile reed that shall go unbroken.
Sorry?

Who are you talking to?
 
Upvote 0

Foghorn

Saved by grace
Mar 8, 2010
1,186
126
New England
Visit site
✟44,586.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No problem, Mr. G. I do want to say again that it is pleasant for two people like you and I, who are both pretty passionate about our take on things, to be able to disagree without getting fed up with each other. We're getting to plumb some depths that are usually too deep to go because the emotions get in the way. It's been a fun ride.
Make that 3. :)
 
Upvote 0

Forge3

Forge
Aug 26, 2009
4,559
226
Toronto
✟28,441.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Well than, your a false prophet.

Why would you make such a prideful statement?

Editing this post foghorn.

I was off my meds. But I do not always like being dependant on something other than God. So I have tried to stop such dependancy on meds and have failed for I always end up saying foolish things at some point.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey EddieL (you are in red),

This is my response to your post #31:

Originally Posted by gmm4j http://www.christianforums.com/t7690263-4/#post61469603
Col 1:22-23
But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation- 23 if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.

Is this faith that can save, real faith that you credit to an act of God? If so, how is it possible for you to forsake the gift that is already "yours"?

Maybe this wasn't real faith that was given even though it is based on the hope held out in the gospel?



You're doing it again! You are taking a work of encouragement and making "logical" conclusions about it to determine theology.

What I think I’m doing is taking a work of encouragement and making “logical” conclusions to bolster theology.

This is pastoral advice, and to those who are truly reborn of the Spirit it will take root.

It is pastoral advice that they must continue in their faith to be presented holy in His sight, without blemish and free from accusation.

The visible church is not "the elect".

Amen.

It is a group of people claiming to be.

Mostly.

Those who hold out until the end will have shown "their calling and election sure".

True. However, the referred to text tells the brothers to make their calling and election sure, not show their calling and election to be sure.

In the meantime, all of us are instructing each other and praying that our words are being used by God as a means of grace to those who are being saved.

Amen.

The Spirit uses means, and one primary means is Scripture.


True. But, of course, according to Calvinism these means cannot be used to convince or draw the unregenerate toward Christ because they will reject them every time.

If the Spirit grabs a person in the body by the Paul's encouragement and it leads to that person remaining faithful, that is grace in action.

What you have stated in this sentence is true.

Blessings!
 
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey EddieL (you are in red),

Originally Posted by gmm4j
The fact that He prayed for Peter implies that "God's gift" to Peter could have failed.


I disagree. The fact that He prayed for Peter implies that God's power is needed to sustain Peter's faith.


Satan was going to sift Peter. The events of the night and the pointed accusations of, “aren’t you one of them,” pressured Peter to the point of rejecting Christ three times. Jesus told Peter this was going to happen. But, beyond this failure of faith (which was a failure to a degree), it is implied that Peter’s faith could have failed outright, but Jesus’ prayed that this would not happen (implying that it could), and He knew Peter would return and stated, “when you return.”

Yes, God had to intervene on behalf of Peter’s faith. Again, I find it interesting that God would have to step in to help his faith. It helps us to see the nature of this gift that God has given. It can go up and down, be weak or strong, little or great, and as suggested even fail, etc. Also, it was through the means of events and outside secondary influences that caused his faith to fail to a degree. I guess we need to ask, could he have stood strong in the faith and not denied Christ? I think he could have, but Jesus knew he wouldn’t (Job did). So, as I see it, we are not told how God sustained Peter’s faith, which I agree with you He did, but I would submit the means by which it was done was most likely secondary, outward, and resistible, but Praise God influential and effective.

God never makes us self-sustaining. Regeneration is not God pressing some impersonal button that starts a faith generator so that we no longer need the Spirit.

Amen.

Our sustenance depends on the Spirit every nano-second. If the Spirit ever withdrew from me, I'd be a God-hater in about 2 seconds.

And, we would cease to be. He holds us together (Col 1:17, pastoral encouragement J).

The gift of faith is really the gift of the Spirit.

Not sure exactly what you mean here. You are not referring to the baptism of the Spirit are you? Or, trying to establish an order?

Genuine faith is His fruit, after all.

Faith(fulness) is the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5).

I AM NEVER SELF-DETERMINING.

Not sure exactly what you mean by self-determining. If the following is a description of what you mean, I agree. We are not in a vacuum. And, for those who love Him and are called according to His purpose He does through various means work all things together for our good.

I'm either being influenced by the Spirit or I'm being influenced by the sin in me. The Spirit is using every moment of my life (and everything that comes with that moment) as a means of grace, or I'm being left to myself. Most of the time it is a combination of both. All of it is for my good, and all of it is for God's glory, and its imperfect operation is part of God's perfect plan for our being made perfect.

Amen. However, not to the point of being puppets. We have a will. It is a fight of faith. We wrestle with these things.

How does God strengthen His faith? It doesn't say. Does God irresistibly reach into Peter's heart and turn up the faith amps? I doubt it.

Every circumstance, every physical particle, and every spiritual blessing is a part of the means God uses for those He loves. There isn't anything that isn't a means that the Spirit uses. There's no volume knob for grace or faith. There's simply Providence.

Amen. It is not an irresistible force that turns a knob up or down in us. And even, as you stated, Regeneration is not God pressing some impersonal button”. But to me that is what the Calvinist version of regeneration looks like, a flip of the switch against the will of an unwilling stubborn and rebellious individual – very impersonal.

When Jesus noted that the feilds were white unto harvest. He said that we should pray that the Lord of the harvest irresistibly regenerate them all. No, pray that He send laborers into the field. Perhaps, God strengthened Peter's faith by having someone bring him an encouraging word. Faith comes by hearing...


What I hope you can come to understand is that Calvinists believe in secondary causes and means, too.

Amen. I’m with ya.

We just see the encourager, the evangelist, the laborers, and everything else as being managed by God with the purpose and power and promise to succeed.

I agree here also. A beautiful orchestrated synergism for the Glory of ONE.

On the day that I believed, there was an ice storm. My 45-minute commute home was turned into a 4 1/2 hour trek (I was living and working near Washing D.C.). My heart had been turned towards the gospel, but as a software engineer I had some intellectual arrogance. I wanted the Bible to be real, but refused to accept that it was. I had been listening to WAVA radio shows because I was into talk radio and Christian talk was all there was at the time in D.C. Every show on the way home was about "why we can believe the Bible is true". There was a special guest on the "Bible Answer Man". D. James Kennedy was in a series about it. It was a non-stop, 4 hour message on exactly what my objection was during an ice-storm where there was nothing to do but hear the message.


God set you up!

I was completely overcome. I was won over. Every event for the last year had led up to that day, and every piece of it was constructed just as it had to be to overcome my pride. There were dozen of details, both circumstantially and spiritually, that led to that day, AND THAT WAS JUST FOR ME. I have watched the conversion of my wife and children. I have heard the conversion stories for many of the crowd I grew up with, and it is impossible to ignore the specific people God converted and the significance of it being those specific people. To think of specific, intimate, and personal steps that God goes through for every single believer it is just staggering. He is the Architect of Faith.


Awesome!You see, I see all this as the leading, drawing, convicting, wooing, revealing by the Spirit of an unregenerate person toward Christ until you finally reached the point of genuine faith. This all suggests synergy; you responding to the Spirit prior to regeneration. You didn’t turn the radio station, your “heart had been turned toward the gospel, wanted the Bible to be real, circumstantially and spiritually that led to that day, impossible to ignore the specific people God converted, personal steps… How did a dead, unwilling, rebellious person begin to recognize or respond in the slightest without the ability to do so. Had you been regenerated prior to these promptings without you knowing it? Anyway, this “set up” and leading of the Spirit brought you through a process of query till you came to genuine faith, at which point, I believe you are brought into union with Christ and made righteous by that faith. Also, at this time you came alive by the Spirit (no life prior to Christ) to the things of Spirit and the Kingdom of our God (you start to produce fruit and operate in the gifts). You are indwelt by the Spirit and sealed by Him. The Spirit subsequently leads you into all Truth and works in you and through you for His purposes and pleasure.

When I take my experience to the Bible I see, quite in black and white, that God did everything He needed to to win me over.

Amen. But again, even your verbiage of “personal steps” and being “won” over infers a convincing process toward Christ before regeneration. I don't understand this in light of Calvinisms understanding of Total Inability.

To imagine that I could've refused is laughable.

If you were led by revelation refusal was possible. If you were regenerated in order for all this to happen then you are right you could not have refused. It amazes me that some people who see God move in just as powerful and beautiful ways; they see it, acknowledge it, function in it, and yet they end up rejecting Him and He says of them I never knew. Can you imagine that some who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, would fall away and crucify the Son of God all over again; subjecting him to public disgrace (Heb 6:4-6)?

The designer of the universe knows me inside and out. If He truly wants to sway me, there's no stopping Him. Every molecule of the universe, both visible and invisible, and even time itself bows at His every thought. Any objection I could have He already understands. My will, my pride, my whole existence is a vapor against His will. There is no way I could win against the power and promise of God. To me, to think that I could've refused is the pinnacle of arrogance.

This is all true even if it is the Will of God that He has given you the ability to receive or reject Him, at which point even though we have the ability to receive or reject we are fulfilling His Will to do so.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
E

Eddie L

Guest
]Satan was going to sift Peter. The events of the night and the pointed accusations of, “aren’t you one of them,” pressured Peter to the point of rejecting Christ three times. Jesus told Peter this was going to happen. But, beyond this failure of faith (which was a failure to a degree), it is implied that Peter’s faith could have failed outright, but Jesus’ prayed that this would not happen (implying that it could), and He knew Peter would return and stated, “when you return.” [/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]

Yes, God had to intervene on behalf of Peter’s faith. Again, I find it interesting that God would have to step in to help his faith. It helps us to see the nature of this gift that God has given. It can go up and down, be weak or strong, little or great, and as suggested even fail, etc. Also, it was through the means of events and outside secondary influences that caused his faith to fail to a degree. I guess we need to ask, could he have stood strong in the faith and not denied Christ? I think he could have, but Jesus knew he wouldn’t (Job did). So, as I see it, we are not told how God sustained Peter’s faith, which I agree with you He did, but I would submit the means by which it was done was most likely secondary, outward, and resistible, but Praise God influential and effective.

Any means God used to sustain Peter's faith was a means of grace. It was every experience, biological condition, subconscious memory, genetic predisposition, or some invisible spiritual influence. All of it worked together create the circumstances of that night for Peter. When Jesus prayed for Peter's faith, He was not praying for a turned up volume knob. Jesus was praying for God, the Creator of Each Moment, to shore up ANY MEAN for Peter's faith.

Peter (or any of us) can experience a resistance of anything, but ultimately, God knows what He has to orchestrate to ensure Peter stays in the faith. It isn't just a mystical force that we resist or not, it is the whole Providence of God... that is what we finally can't resist.

The gift of faith is really the gift of the Spirit.

Not sure exactly what you mean here. You are not referring to the baptism of the Spirit are you? Or, trying to establish an order?

No, I'm trying to establish that faith is not just some general ability we are given. Our faith is the result of every move of the Spirit within us and the orchestration of events outside of us. Faith isn't something impersonal. It's inner workings, moment by moment, are responses to the Spirit's work.

Genuine faith is His fruit, after all.

Faith(fulness) is the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5).

Same thing, because a faith without works is dead.

I'm either being influenced by the Spirit or I'm being influenced by the sin in me. The Spirit is using every moment of my life (and everything that comes with that moment) as a means of grace, or I'm being left to myself. Most of the time it is a combination of both. All of it is for my good, and all of it is for God's glory, and its imperfect operation is part of God's perfect plan for our being made perfect.

Amen. However, not to the point of being puppets. We have a will. It is a fight of faith. We wrestle with these things.

We wrestle because we are ordained to wrestle. Every move in the wrestling match is a part of God's agenda for us.

Every circumstance, every physical particle, and every spiritual blessing is a part of the means God uses for those He loves. There isn't anything that isn't a means that the Spirit uses. There's no volume knob for grace or faith. There's simply Providence.

Amen. It is not an irresistible force that turns a knob up or down in us. And even, as you stated, Regeneration is not God pressing some impersonal button”. But to me that is what the Calvinist version of regeneration looks like, a flip of the switch against the will of an unwilling stubborn and rebellious individual – very impersonal.

Then you need to reevaluate Calvinism. There is no button to wind us up and make us operate on our own. The term "regenerate" encompasses a lot of means and causes that the Spirit works in us that is unique for every person. What the Spirit did to regenerate me doesn't look like what He did to regenerate you.

We just see the encourager, the evangelist, the laborers, and everything else as being managed by God with the purpose and power and promise to succeed.

I agree here also. A beautiful orchestrated synergism for the Glory of ONE.


It feels like synergism, sure, but its success is guaranteed by the promise of God.

Awesome!You see, I see all this as the leading, drawing, convicting, wooing, revealing by the Spirit of an unregenerate person toward Christ until you finally reached the point of genuine faith. This all suggests synergy; you responding to the Spirit prior to regeneration. You didn’t turn the radio station, your “heart had been turned toward the gospel, wanted the Bible to be real, circumstantially and spiritually that led to that day, impossible to ignore the specific people God converted, personal steps… How did a dead, unwilling, rebellious, begin to recognize or respond in the slightest without the ability to do so. Had you been regenerated prior to these promptings without you knowing it? Anyway, this “set up” and leading of the Spirit brought you through a process of query till you came to genuine faith, at which point, I believe you are brought into union with Christ and made righteous by that faith. Also, at this time you came alive by the Spirit (no life prior to Christ) to the things of Spirit and the Kingdom of our God (you start to produce fruit and operate in the gifts). You are indwelt by the Spirit and sealed by Him. The Spirit subsequently leads you into all Truth and works in you and through you for His purposes and pleasure.[/quote]

I see my regeneration happening at the point my heart wanted the Bible to be true. My faith followed my heart, which followed the Spirit of God.

When I take my experience to the Bible I see, quite in black and white, that God did everything He needed to to win me over.

Amen. But again, even your verbiage of “personal steps” and being “won” over infers a convincing process toward Christ before regeneration. I don't understand this in light of Calvinisms understanding of Total Inability.

And and I've said, God's drawing is a process. Regenerate had to happen before His drawing would have pulled me.
 
Upvote 0
E

Eddie L

Guest
To imagine that I could've refused is laughable.

If you were led by revelation refusal was possible. If you were regenerated in order for all this to happen then you are right you could not have refused. It amazes me that some people who see God move in just as powerful and beautiful ways; they see it, acknowledge it, function in it, and yet they end up rejecting Him and He says of them I never knew. Can you imagine that some who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, would fall away and crucify the Son of God all over again; subjecting him to public disgrace (Heb 6:4-6)?

I see people who claim Christ doing that, but I'll never see a person who has the Seed of Christ in them do that. The thing is, I won't know the wheat from the chaff until the Last Day.
 
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey Eddie,

Very beautiful presentation of God's work!

Just so I am straight in my understanding, you said, "I see my regeneration happening at the point my heart wanted the Bible to be true. My faith followed my heart, which followed the Spirit of God."

So, you believe you were regenerated when you wanted the Bible to be true and started to investigate and take note of other's conversions, and take intimate pesonal steps where your pride was broken, etc. which ultimately led you to the moment when you savingly believed in the ice storm.

I lean more toward your understanding, but of course would say that you were not regenerated until after genuine belief.

I would be interested in hearing Foghorn's thoughts to your understanding that there was a span of time between regeneratation and genuine faith knowing that he believes regeneration and genuine faith happen simultaneously.

Foghorn?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey Eddie L,

You said,

Then you need to reevaluate Calvinism. There is no button to wind us up and make us operate on our own. The term "regenerate" encompasses a lot of means and causes that the Spirit works in us that is unique for every person. What the Spirit did to regenerate me doesn't look like what He did to regenerate you.


I have to admit this view of regeneration is different than I have found in Calvinism forums. Most times the Inward Call is presented as an Inward Come Forth! Instantly producing life. Regeneration is simply presented as coming alive to enable faith and growth in Christ. Any means and “causes” prior to regeneration are rejected. Any means and causes that effectively conform us to Christ only come after regeneration. So, what I am usually presented with as regeneration has always looked the same with no unique means because again any unique means would only be rejected. It has always been presented to me as a kind of “push of an inner button,” Come Forth! Life results. Faith results from Life. This is 99% of the Calvinist thought I’ve had to deal with. Of course they don’t say “inner button” J
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
E

Eddie L

Guest
Hey Eddie L,

You said,

Then you need to reevaluate Calvinism. There is no button to wind us up and make us operate on our own. The term "regenerate" encompasses a lot of means and causes that the Spirit works in us that is unique for every person. What the Spirit did to regenerate me doesn't look like what He did to regenerate you.


I have to admit this view of regeneration is different than I have found in Calvinism forums. Most times the Inward Call is presented as an Inward Come Forth! Instantly producing life. Regeneration is simply presented as coming alive to enable faith and growth in Christ.


It is that, but it doesn't work alone. The outward call and the inward call combine to create faith in Christ. Without the inward call, the outward call will be foolish to anyone. Without the outward call, the means God has chosen to bring His elect to faith is missing.

Any means and “causes” prior to regeneration are rejected. Any means and causes that effectively conform us to Christ only come after regeneration. So, what I am usually presented with as regeneration has always looked the same with no unique means because again any unique means would only be rejected.

There is a lot that God does to draw us, inwardly and outwardly. What you are usually getting from Calvinists are the distinctions between the way you see things and the way we see things. The trouble is that it isn't either/or. It is both/and. My objection to your view isn't that God uses means. My objection is that you think that God could purpose Himself to save a person through those means and that His purpose would fail.

It has always been presented to me as a kind of “push of an inner button,” Come Forth! Life results. Faith results from Life. This is 99% of the Calvinist thought I’ve had to deal with. Of course they don’t say “inner button”

When my bosses talk to each other about, say, the release of some major software version, they speak at one level. When I speak to my peers (line manager) we use another. When my team speaks to developers and operators they use another still. They are all talking about the same thing, but I have to use the correct mental filter in every conversation I have or I will either become confused or contribute to the confusion.

It is ok to say that regeneration produces life, that it is an inward call, that there is a part of it (or all of it, depending on your working definition) that is instantaneous. What doesn't work is failing to see that there are a lot of details and means that are being left out of that conversation. We have to know what we mean sometimes, and not just what words we're choosing to use to express it.

There is no single chart or graph that we can write to turn the understanding of God into something simple. The gospel is simple and radically complex all at the same time. This means we need to understand the perspective of every conversation or expect to misunderstand something.

Most conversation on theology forums get so guarded that we draw battle lines around certain terms or ideas. It's rare to be able to get into the details enough to realize what we're really talking about.
 
Upvote 0

gmm4j

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2012
2,631
12
SC
✟2,859.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hey EddieL,

Great post.

You said,

My objection is that you think that God could purpose Himself to save a person through those means and that His purpose would fail.

I would not say that His purpose or means ever fail. The means are effective for the salvation of those He knows will receive His salvation, and the means are effective to display the greatness of His love, leaving those who will reject Him without excuse and deserving of greater punishment.
 
Upvote 0
E

Eddie L

Guest
Hey EddieL,

Great post.

You said,

My objection is that you think that God could purpose Himself to save a person through those means and that His purpose would fail.

I would not say that His purpose or means ever fail. The means are effective for the salvation of those He knows will receive His salvation, and the means are effective to display the greatness of His love, leaving those who will reject Him without excuse and deserving of greater punishment.

I know you wouldn't say that God's purposes would fail, Mr. G. What I should have said is that "I object to your view because I see Scripture putting the salvation of man in the hands of God. If He ever purposes to save a person that person will be saved, or He has failed."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0