Brother Oscarr, how would you read 1 Cor 14:5 if you were totally innocent/ignorant of the pentecostal understanding of "tongues"?
Let's say you cracked open your Bible 300 years ago and read 1 Cor 14:5 for the first time. Do you think you might understand it differently?
I submit yes, your understanding would be different my friend. I think you are reading your own understanding into the text. The words on the page sound like they are affirming what you believe, so you assume the meaning and latch onto it.
If someone who has no idea about the pentecostal understanding of tongues reads that chapter, they would still think the Apostle is simply talking about human languages that already exist:
1Co 14:1-11
(1) Pursue love, and earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy.
(2)
For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.
(3) On the other hand, the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation.
(4) The one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself, but the one who prophesies builds up the church.
(5) Now I want you all to speak in tongues, but even more to prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues, unless someone interprets, so that the church may be built up.
(6) Now, brothers, if I come to you speaking in tongues, how will I benefit you unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or teaching?
(7) If even lifeless instruments, such as the flute or the harp, do not give distinct notes, how will anyone know what is played?
(8) And if the bugle gives an indistinct sound, who will get ready for battle?
(9) So with yourselves, if with your tongue you utter speech that is not intelligible, how will anyone know what is said? For you will be speaking into the air.
(10)
There are doubtless many different languages in the world, and none is without meaning,
(11)
but if I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me.
He's still talking bout worldly languages in verse 2 my friend. He's simply saying that nobody understands that particular language. It is a baseless assertion and eisegesis to suggest that Paul is referring to the modern day pentecostal understanding of tongues.
So rather than cut 1 Cor 14 out of my Bible I'll simply understand it differently than you
I'll try to understand it the way a reader from 200, 500, or 1800 years ago would understand it, before the 20th century Pentecostal movement
my 2c
You had better get a pair of scissors and cut 1 Corinthians 14 out of your Bible. You are better off without it, because you obviously don't believe what it says.
If you did happen to read the chapter closely, you will see that it is Paul teaching the wayward Corinthians the correct way to use the gift of tongues and prophecy. He did not have to teach the other churches because they were already using these gifts in the correct manner. But the Corinthians had a few problems with tongues and prophecy, so Paul had to put them right. This means that Paul's teaching about tongues and prophecy in 1 Corinthians 14 is the bench mark for the use of tongues in the churches, including today's church (if it is God's church that is, and not a dead monument).
Notice that it says that the person who speaks in an unknown tongues speaks directly to God because no person is able to understand them.
He also says that if a person wants to speak in tongues in church, make sure there is an interpreter, otherwise do his speaking to himself and to God and not out loud so that other people can hear and misunderstand it to be a message to the group. This means that there is a private use for tongues where the speaker is alone with God and that God hears and understands the language.
So what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 14 contradicts your view that it has to be an understandable language every time. Corinthians support that the gift is a public and private one, fulfilling two different purposes.
If you think that tongues is jibber jabber, you want to hear two Indian or Chinese people talking together. It all sounds like gobbledygook to me, yet they are speaking intelligible languages. I have interviewed many ethnic people, using an interpreter and it always amazes me how that the jibber jabber they speak translates into very intelligent and insightful English.
I think you need to do a bit more honest talking with God about it, and then stick around and spend a bit of time with Him allowing Him to open your mind about it, instead of you just repeating parrot fashion what other anti-tongues people are saying. It's no point finding out more about something from others who are untaught as well. Your first step is to learn that "tongues" is spelled that way, and not "tounges". Once you have got that right, you are halfway there! 
You have to use your common sense. If you want to find out more about, say restaurant cooking, you wouldn't go and learn from someone who can't cook. You would consult someone who has experience in that field.
So if you want to know more about the gifts of the Spirit, including tongues and prophecy, wouldn't you go and find a Pentecostal or Charismatic Christian whom you trust to be a good solid person who would not give you any hype or baloney, but would give you a sound, Scriptural account of it? That would make sense to me. I got my MA in English by being taught by those who had PhDs in English. I got my teacher's diploma through qualified teachers. I had a fool of a teacher when I learned violin (I taught myself), and although I can play respectably, I could have done a lot better having a qualified and experienced violin teacher.
