Some Reasons I Don't Believe in Evolution

[Skaloop]

I'm 57.

That got me thinking, and if you'd been on CF your entire life, from birth to now, without sleep, based on your post count you'd be posting once every 15 minutes.

Just offering a little perspective, not trying to demean or anything. But since you've done it in just over 5 years, that's nearly a post a minute. I know that's largely counting threads, but still impressive.

 

[AV1611VET]

That got me thinking, and if you'd been on CF your entire life, from birth to now, without sleep, based on your post count you'd be posting once every 15 minutes.

Just offering a little perspective, not trying to demean or anything. But since you've done it in just over 5 years, that's nearly a post a minute. I know that's largely counting threads, but still impressive.

-- Thank you.

 

[Doveaman]

How old are you?

What do you mean by "old"?

 

[AV1611VET]

What do you mean by "old"?

ZING!
​

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

What do you mean by "old"?

Most people understand the phrase, but in case you don't, how long ago was it (in years, which is a unit of time) that your mother gave birth to you?

 

[AV1611VET]

Most people understand the phrase, but in case you don't, how long ago was it (in years, which is a unit of time) that your mother gave birth to you?

What do you mean by "ago"?

 

[Loudmouth]

I love the way you don't know any of this but you state it as fact.
From what I said you can't infer this. You're just guessing. It's what you want to believe. You don't really KNOW anything about me.

This, coming from somebody who pushes the theoscientific method where beliefs are treated as facts.

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

What do you mean by "ago"?

Even without counting threads, your post count would still be ridiculously high because of these types of vapid, eye-roll-inducing posts that you churn out.

Here's my answer.

 

[AV1611VET]

Even without counting threads, your post count would still be ridiculously high because of these types of vapid, eye-roll-inducing posts that you churn out.

No, it would be ridiculously-high due to:

1. Repeatedly answering the same questions over and over, until I got tired of it and started QVing my answers.
2. Answering false accusations, such as I being into Last Thursdayism.
3. Having to answer imperatives like, "Define age."
4. Begging and begging and begging for answers to my questions.

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

No, it would be ridiculously-high due to:

1. Repeatedly answering the same questions over and over, until I got tired of it and started QVing my answers.
2. Answering false accusations, such as I being into Last Thursdayism.
3. Having to answer imperatives like, "Define age."
4. Begging and begging and begging for answers to my questions.

You asked for a definition of "ago".

 

[AV1611VET]

You asked for a definition of "ago".

LOL -- I've been asked for a definition of "age" --

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

LOL -- I've been asked for a definition of "age" --

Because of your Embedded Age blathering. No one here has a questionable definition of "ago".

I'd be really curious to know how old Doveaman is, because he sounds exactly like a college freshman.

 

[AV1611VET]

I'd be really curious to know how old Doveaman is, because he sounds exactly like a college freshman.

Then why don't you ask him?

 

[sandwiches]

No, it would be ridiculously-high due to:

1. Repeatedly answering the same questions over and over, until I got tired of it and started QVing my answers.
2. Answering false accusations, such as I being into Last Thursdayism.
3. Having to answer imperatives like, "Define age."
4. Begging and begging and begging for answers to my questions.

1. You evade points and answer in absurdities a lot of the time.
2. You are. Changing meanings of words doesn't reality.
3. We do that multiple times because you like equivocation.
4. ROFL! This is so ironic considering how many times you ignore or openly refuse to answer our questions AND answers.

AV, check your eyes for planks.

 

[Belk]

LOL -- I've been asked for a definition of "age" --

Yes, amazingly enough when you claim that an object can have two completely different "ages" people will ask you questions to try to ascertain how you are using terms in a different manner then they normally apply. Your inability to answer in anything other then circles lets us know exactly how much credence we should give your idea.

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

Then why don't you ask him?

I have, but he has ignored me

 

[razeontherock]

Is this creating, or evolving?

 

[Davian]

With the slight change per post, I'd go with evolving. Since we don't have time or server space for that, I PM'd him, pointing him to where AV does his post count thing.

 

[Doveaman]

This, coming from somebody who pushes the theoscientific method where beliefs are treated as facts.

The beliefs are not the facts. The beliefs are based on the facts. DUH!

 

[Jazer]

And if man can clone a human from non-reproductive cells of another human, then this gives support to Genesis' claim about Eve's origin - a human being formed from the rib of another human.

As we all know men have xy and women only have xx. So a women can NOT make a man, but a man has the DNA to make a women. It seems like every time Science confirms that the Bible is true it could have gone the other way.