Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
i cant since there is a natural process that can create waterfalls. thus i cant conclude design when i see a waterfall.
Then how do you account for the differences on CF?
The internet allows for the oddest of odd-balls with big mouths to spout what they believe.
For the same reason I grow raspberries instead of buying them.
We all know that building something from scratch is more satisfying.
I'd rather build a tesla than just find one with the keys in it.
why it will be evidence against design? we all know that a fan is evidence for design. why doest it matter if it can reproduce or not?
If I could encode DNA....absolutely. What a blast!And would you start your raspberry growing endeavour by trying to evolve raspberries from more primitive plants?
Are you calling your fellow creationists here the "oddest of odd-balls"?
so a fan that is able to reproduce doesnt need design?. ok. why you believe that a natural process can made something that even the smartest man on earth cant do?Because if an object is designed and artificially built, it does not require the ability to reproduce itself.
After all, if fans could reproduce themselves, it would put all the people in the fan factories out of work.
actually the opposite is true. i never said that we can always detect design. we can detect design only in some objects that are clearly the product of design. like watch a car or an airplane. you dont?It's now there for all to see - after 2 years @xianghua has finally admitted his argument about design is nonsense.
Only because we can tell that they are man-made. In natural objects it is not possible to tell--just like you admitted with the waterfall example.actually the opposite is true. i never said that we can always detect design. we can detect design only in some objects that are clearly the product of design. like watch a car or an airplane. you dont?
No, because in a car or watch I can discover evidence of human manufacturing techniques in use.and you believe that because we have no natural process that can make a car or a watch. right?
No, because if I see it evolving naturally there won't be evidence of human manufacturing techniques.so if you will see a car evolving naturally in front of your eyes you will still conclude design?
The opposite is not true. Your whole schtick is that we can detect design simply by looking at something, but when asked to demonstrate how this works your answer was "I can't".actually the opposite is true. i never said that we can always detect design.
How do you know they are designed? If you are relying on prior knowledge then you are not detecting design. If you have no prior knowledge but can detect design you should be able to use the same technique to identify any object that has been designed, yet you were unable to identify the designed waterfall. That's tacit admission that your argument is worthless and wrong.we can detect design only in some objects that are clearly the product of design. like watch a car or an airplane. you dont?
so a fan that is able to reproduce doesnt need design?. ok. why you believe that a natural process can made something that even the smartest man on earth cant do?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?