Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Evidence "proves" the theory of evolution. Do you believe that people are proven guilty in courts of law?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evidence "proves" the theory of evolution. Do you believe that people are proven guilty in courts of law?View attachment 203552 I believe we are created spirit, soul and body but still three in one. The same way God created the universe. We do not find heaven in space either. It is another dimension. We can not go there in Our physical form. If evolution was proven true as most say it is I believe I would still not loose my faith, but I would very much doubt that evolution was true. It once was "true" that the earth was flat too and if We went too far We could fall off. I have hard to believe that nothing itself could produce space from nothing. Then a light, then molecules that turn into dust and planets and fire and gas and explode in a big bang and somehow the series of events creates all kinds of animals and humans from fish without the hand of God. But I do believe that the ant does not know all there is to know about the worldevents today, worldhistory and so on, but it knows enough. Me neither, I do not know it all, I need to rely on Gods grace. But I have been created with a body and a brain and some creating curiosity, however I do have limits to that too. And without God we could not even question if the universe was created by God or by itself. It would all collapse. That is my belief. But who could truly prove the evolutiontheory but God. He is the only one that has lived that long.
Evidence "proves" the theory of evolution. Do you believe that people are proven guilty in courts of law?
Oh my!! Sounds like projection to me.Sometimes I believe the judge and the jury are simply tired and want the case over with, just to go to lunch. They might also have decided in their mind that they do not like a special person that is accused so they prefer to believe a lie about that person.
You had the date...the KT layer. Face it.dad, you are not being honest. I asked for specific dates that you wanted supported. YOU ran way. I asked you when your mythical flood was. YOU ran away. I can't support dates that you do not ask about. I am not about to support all of them. There is no point. The flood that you believe in lasted for a year. Give me a date and then I will support it.
So far your answer to my "Yes" "No" question has been a "No".
That was 65 million years ago. You fail. There were no human beings alive at that time. If you want to claim that date showing that you are wrong is as easy as could be:You had the date...the KT layer. Face it.
Rattling of dates you can't support eh?That was 65 million years ago.
How would you know?There were no human beings alive at that time.
Rattling of dates you can't support eh?
How would you know?
Mentioning imaginary faith based years that you do not know the basis of and couldn't care just can't help you. I am actually familiar with their belief system, while you just worship it blindly.Wrong, I can support it. I just did.
What is to refute? You tossed out foolish dates that you must support.YOU can't refute it.
Saying the words 65 million years actually is not minimal evidence, it is blathering.Even though the evidence I gave is minimal,
You are mildly acquainted with the evo fable. I happen to know the foundational premises and have a comprehension of the actual issues.Because I know the evolutionary history of man.
Sorry dad, but until you come up with some evidence you lose. I supported my date. You have not supported any of your claims ever.Mentioning imaginary faith based years that you do not know the basis of and couldn't care just can't help you. I am actually familiar with their belief system, while you just worship it blindly.
What is to refute? You tossed out foolish dates that you must support.
Saying the words 65 million years actually is not minimal evidence, it is blathering.
You are mildly acquainted with the evo fable. I happen to know the foundational premises and have a comprehension of the actual issues.
mENTIONING SO CALLED DATES IS NOT SUPPORTING ANYTHING.Sorry dad, but until you come up with some evidence you lose. I supported my date. You have not supported any of your claims ever.
Did you not notice the title of this thread?
Then it is a good thing that I did more than just mention them.mENTIONING SO CALLED DATES IS NOT SUPPORTING ANYTHING.
No. You claim that the imaginary years used to date the KT layer are gospel, and cannot begin to defend them. That is not debate, it is religious impudence.Then it is a good thing that I did more than just mention them.
You were the one that hand waved and gave no support for your claims. I was lazy on purpose because that's all that it takes to defeat no evidence at all.
Until you support your claims with a valid source you lose.
No. You claim that the imaginary years used to date the KT layer are gospel, and cannot begin to defend them. That is not debate, it is religious impudence.
Let's review how you supported the dates for the KT layer? Oh, right, as always you did nothing but pretend. Some game.Wrong again. I have evidence that supports me. You have none. Sadly you do not even seem to understand the concept of evidence.
dad, until you find some evidence that supports you, you have lost.
Whatever dates they believe, I'm sure someone else did the field work and put the sweat equity into it.Let's review how you supported the dates for the KT layer?
True. I have chatted with some folks who actually knew their own religion pretty good. Some of these godless spam posters here don't seem to have a clue.Whatever dates they believe, I'm sure someone else did the field work and put the sweat equity into it.
They just believe their documentation.
Someone wants honest answers.i am entirely confused as to why this thread has turned into a fight...
Yup.True. I have chatted with some folks who actually knew their own religion pretty good. Some of these godless spam posters here don't seem to have a clue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?