Radagast said:Did you mean solo or sola? (they're not the same)
-- Radagast
It doesn't really matter . .
there is no significant difference between solo and sola except in degree . . .
Peace in Him!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Radagast said:Did you mean solo or sola? (they're not the same)
-- Radagast
There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . .thereselittleflower said:It doesn't really matter . .
there is no significant difference between solo and sola except in degree . . .
Radagast said:There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . .
-- Radagast
I've said all I want to say on the topic elsewhere...thereselittleflower said:There is a WORLD of difference.
Well that sort of depends on which tradition of sola scripture you come from.Radagast said:There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . .
-- Radagast
That makes no sense. Sola Scripture isnt complicated and it doesnt come in degrees.Radagast said:There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . .
-- Radagast
Hoonbaba said:When I used to be a protestant, I understood sola scripture is not so much as a book which one interprets with the holy spirit supposedly guiding him/her, rather it's understood as what the believer is to believe without including some ungodly beliefs/practices like including voodooism or other witchcraft-related practices.
In other words, I used to believe in sola scriptura because I didn't want to introduce some sort of bizarre practices which have absolutely no foundation in scripture. It was more or less seen as a kind of safety net. Of course, in my view, that position ironically is not without significant problems. But that's why many protestants believe adhere to sola scriptura. It seems they simply see it as a safety net, while Catholics see a completely different perspective, which most, if not all of us would agree has problems.
Radagast said:I've said all I want to say on the topic elsewhere...
Pax Christi,
-- Radagast
Shelb5 said:That makes no sense. Sola Scripture isnt complicated and it doesnt come in degrees.
Well, there are some groups who basically say "If it aint in the Bible, it aint true!"I don't see how. It's either your sole rule of faith or it isn't.
ps139 said:This is why a Lutheran can believe in the Perpetual Virginity of Mary, and the Immaculate Conception, while a Southern Baptist would probably never even consider it. They have different understandings of "sola scriptura."
So what then? If you don't want to believe it you don't have to? If you do, then fine?? I don't get it, what makes tradition okay in some beliefs and not in others?
Shelb5 said:So what then? If you don't want to believe it you don't have to? If you do, then fine?? I don't get it, what makes tradition okay in some beliefs and not in others?
Such as Marian doctrine, if you want to believe its fine, if you dont want to fine also? Is that how it works?Qoheleth said:Such as...?
Q