• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Sola Scriptura?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,877
✟367,481.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
thereselittleflower said:
It doesn't really matter . .

there is no significant difference between solo and sola except in degree . . .
There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . . ;)

-- Radagast
 
Upvote 0

geocajun

Priest of the holy smackrament
Dec 25, 2002
25,483
1,689
✟35,477.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Radagast said:
There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . . ;)

-- Radagast
Well that sort of depends on which tradition of sola scripture you come from.
These traditions vary greatly in teaching and in practice.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Radagast said:
There's no significant difference between Sola Scriptura and the Catholic view of tradition, except in degree . . . ;)

-- Radagast
That makes no sense. Sola Scripture isn’t complicated and it doesn’t come in degrees.

Catholic view it as the written down part of God’s revelation to man, Protestants views it as the only revelation God gave to man, ergo sola scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
45
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟25,659.00
Faith
Catholic
When I used to be a protestant, I understood sola scripture is not so much as a book which one interprets with the holy spirit supposedly guiding him/her, rather it's understood as what the believer is to believe without including some ungodly beliefs/practices like including voodooism or other witchcraft-related practices.

In other words, I used to believe in sola scriptura because I didn't want to introduce some sort of bizarre practices which have absolutely no foundation in scripture. It was more or less seen as a kind of safety net. Of course, in my view, that position ironically is not without significant problems. But that's why many protestants believe adhere to sola scriptura. It seems they simply see it as a safety net, while Catholics see a completely different perspective, which most, if not all of us would agree has problems.
 
Upvote 0

PeterPaul

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2004
9,263
299
51
✟33,494.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hoonbaba said:
When I used to be a protestant, I understood sola scripture is not so much as a book which one interprets with the holy spirit supposedly guiding him/her, rather it's understood as what the believer is to believe without including some ungodly beliefs/practices like including voodooism or other witchcraft-related practices.

In other words, I used to believe in sola scriptura because I didn't want to introduce some sort of bizarre practices which have absolutely no foundation in scripture. It was more or less seen as a kind of safety net. Of course, in my view, that position ironically is not without significant problems. But that's why many protestants believe adhere to sola scriptura. It seems they simply see it as a safety net, while Catholics see a completely different perspective, which most, if not all of us would agree has problems.

Which problems? The "safety net"?
 
Upvote 0

ps139

Ab omni malo, libera nos, Domine!
Sep 23, 2003
15,088
818
New Jersey
Visit site
✟45,407.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I don't see how. It's either your sole rule of faith or it isn't.
Well, there are some groups who basically say "If it aint in the Bible, it aint true!"
Others use tradition as a rough guide to interpreting Scripture, but still hold Scripture as the final authority.

This is why a Lutheran can believe in the Perpetual Virginity of Mary, and the Immaculate Conception, while a Southern Baptist would probably never even consider it. They have different understandings of "sola scriptura."
 
Upvote 0

Qoheleth

Byzantine Catholic
Jul 8, 2004
2,702
142
✟26,372.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
ps139 said:
This is why a Lutheran can believe in the Perpetual Virginity of Mary, and the Immaculate Conception, while a Southern Baptist would probably never even consider it. They have different understandings of "sola scriptura."

...and the Real presence and the Office of the keys and Confession (private) and the Invocation of Saints, Prayers for the dead, Infant baptism

Scripture can never be interpreted in a vacuum.


Q
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟65,355.00
Faith
Catholic
Shelb5 said:
So what then? If you don't want to believe it you don't have to? If you do, then fine?? I don't get it, what makes tradition okay in some beliefs and not in others?

It is the degree to the place given to the bible . . whether it is bible alone, or bible along with tradition . ..

But in protestantism, even in groups where they make room for tradition along with the bible, the bible is held as supreme OVER tradition . . . it is held higher than tradition . .

And that doesn't make sense to me, for the bible needs to be interpreted, so whatever does the interpreting is actually a higher authority than what is interpreted . . .


Peace in Him!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.