• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,951
10,060
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟597,590.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Dear OnThe Way,

Your views are, of course, very fashionable in the West, and no doubt elsewhere, but they are not what is taught by the Catholic Church. The fact that we, as individuals, might have some trouble disciplining ourselves is further proof, were any needed, of the wisdom of having a Magisterium. We can all elect to follow those parts of the teachings of the Church which suit us, but that does not hide the fact that it is disobedience.

A love that confuses itself with lust manifests itself by a tendency to regard one's wife, or husband, as a sexual being rather than as a fellow human being made in the image of God. A good guide in this area is that if you would be ashamed to confess it, you should probably not be doing it.

Peace,

Anglian
:thumbsup:

I particularly think the peculiar part was advocating wife swapping and such...because 'people are into what they want' type of mindset.

Not even the EO would believe that.
 
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Good point about temperance. I hope this hasn't disturbed you to much.

FWIW, making light of addiction you know nothing about or religion as an addiction is not balanced in and of itself. Would you say a religious is a religion addict. Its a way to salvation, and that way is following Jesus and his word and Church. Would you say the preaching of a Paul or Fr. Corapi is intemperate? Don't mistake truth for zeal.

We aren't talking about scrupulosity here either but about moral theology.

If you would like to talk about addiction then please start a new thread and we can do that too. I have a BA in clinical counseling and co-existing addictions and disorders as well as psycho-biology, have worked in rehab and crisis intervention centers so discussing that dynamic with you would be interesting for me. But I digress. As I said this is about the morality of sodomy yet I cannot deny sensing you are disturbed by something.

Try a little righteousness instead and there will be no need for defensiveness. And by all means if your conscience is troubled by something said here, examine it and then take it to the Lord in contemplative prayer and or your spiritual counsel. Your not judged by any human being sister and as far as I know, no one here is your enemy.

If there is anything more personal you would like to discuss privately in PM that would be my pleasure as well.

Peace and God bless.
I'll read the rest in a minute--but it's interesting that your immediate reaction is that I am making light of addicition, and asume that I actually know nothing of addicition, or specifically a(I am assuming) aout your particular addiction. YOu are wrong on all accounts.

I think many people, indeed, are religious addicts--and because of the denial aspect of addiction are unable to see the intemperate nature and disordered expression of that. I do ABSOLUTELY think that there is (obviously) a healthy relationship with religion- and moreso that holiness is all about right relationship- with Trinity and with of brothers and sisters....most people don't want to do the work of growing in wholeness-and that, to me, is why the path to heaven is narrow.
 
Upvote 0

OnTheWay

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2005
4,724
366
43
✟6,746.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
:thumbsup:

I particularly think the peculiar part was advocating wife swapping and such...because 'people are into what they want' type of mindset.

Not even the EO would believe that.

Is it really that hard to actually read a post and get a message out of it? It seems this whole subject pops up very often, people just PO'ed at eachother over their differing views and that's about that. I'm not advocating wife swaping, or anything else for that matter. Merely pointing out that if people decide they're into one thing or another they're going to do it and will come up with a justification if they feel they need one. There isn't much to be done about it, so why bother arguing? I enjoy the occassional pointless argument, but seriously, this is just beating a dead horse.
 
Upvote 0

OnTheWay

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2005
4,724
366
43
✟6,746.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Dear OnThe Way,

Your views are, of course, very fashionable in the West, and no doubt elsewhere, but they are not what is taught by the Catholic Church. The fact that we, as individuals, might have some trouble disciplining ourselves is further proof, were any needed, of the wisdom of having a Magisterium. We can all elect to follow those parts of the teachings of the Church which suit us, but that does not hide the fact that it is disobedience.

A love that confuses itself with lust manifests itself by a tendency to regard one's wife, or husband, as a sexual being rather than as a fellow human being made in the image of God. A good guide in this area is that if you would be ashamed to confess it, you should probably not be doing it.

Peace,

Anglian

The RCC, the EOC, and the OOC teach a lot of things that the vast majority of their members don't bother following. I believe it runs, "many are called, few are chosen." As such it's not really a view, that would be bothering to jump in with this and that is okay and this and that is wrong. Not going to bother, truth is people are going to do what they want and there's nothing to be done about it. Maybe at some point someone will reach a cross roads and say, "hey, we shouldn't have been doing XXXXX all those years." Maybe they'll keep doing it as long as they are able. The RCC also says you can't use birth control, not too many Catholics bother with that either. Just the way of things.
 
Upvote 0

Anglian

let us love one another, for love is of God
Oct 21, 2007
8,092
1,246
Held
✟28,241.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
The RCC, the EOC, and the OOC teach a lot of things that the vast majority of their members don't bother following. I believe it runs, "many are called, few are chosen." As such it's not really a view, that would be bothering to jump in with this and that is okay and this and that is wrong. Not going to bother, truth is people are going to do what they want and there's nothing to be done about it. Maybe at some point someone will reach a cross roads and say, "hey, we shouldn't have been doing XXXXX all those years." Maybe they'll keep doing it as long as they are able. The RCC also says you can't use birth control, not too many Catholics bother with that either. Just the way of things.

Dear OnTheWay,

Your views here are, too, very fashionable. But they are not Catholic teaching. Truth is the Risen Lord; Truth is what the Catholic Church teaches; sin is departing from the Truth. Those who cannot bring themselves to obey the teachings of the Catholic Church only need go down the road to the Anglicans, where the view you express is common.


Peace,

Anglian
 
Upvote 0

JoabAnias

Steward of proportionality- I Cor 13:1, 1 Tim 3:15
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2007
21,200
3,283
✟105,374.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think many people, indeed, are religious addicts--and because of the denial aspect of addiction are unable to see the intemperate nature and disordered expression of that. I do ABSOLUTELY think that there is (obviously) a healthy relationship with religion- and moreso that holiness is all about right relationship- with Trinity and with of brothers and sisters....most people don't want to do the work of growing in wholeness-and that, to me, is why the path to heaven is narrow.

Interesting and I agree temperance is a virtue and there is imbalance without it, however, seems some would say celibacy is a religious addiction too? Or do they really mean scrupulosity, its unclear to me that the difference is recognized? And adversely what would one describe as the opposite of scrupulosity? Isn't it also sin. Balance as you said is the narrow path. How is sodomy or any
Eph 5:4 also baseness, and foolish talking, or joking (the things not becoming), but rather thanksgiving. - temperate? It is not.

Will you concede to:
Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through Law; for also I did not know lust except the Law said, "You shall not lust." Ex. 20:17

So it would seem that Lust is sin:
Rom 7:8 But sin taking occasion through the commandment worked every lust in me; for apart from Law, sin is dead.

Yet some would seem to have us believe to have pleasure is not Lust and I could go along with that as true yet I must question if people know what Lust is as they have this uncanny ability to disorder their conscience and then holding that as truth as evidenced with believing that baseness and sodomy is a-ok.

Its unbiblical to desire Lust in the bedroom or to promote that by any means just for the sake of pleasure though having convinced oneself its then a-ok.
Rom 13:9 For, "Do not commit adultery," (which Jesus said IS the same as Lust) "do not murder," "do not steal," do not bear false witness, "do not lust," Ex. 20:13-15, 17 and if there is any other commandment, in this word it is summed up, in the words, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." Lev. 19:18

Now I must ask, if ones spouse expects Lust or promotes Lust with baseness are they really loving their spouse or themselves as we're called? Now I speak from experience, though marriage is no longer my vocation, and the single state is also a vocation, but the obvious answer is NO it is not real love and is inherently selfish for the sake of gratification. The unitive aspects of marital union can easily become an excuse to Lust. Its false. Plain and simple. I guess some would say Jesus was a prude huh? Thats because His standard is not of this world but in that which we are called. Are we to conform to Jesus or to the world? Free will gives us the choice and its not religious addiction or scrupulosity to choose the former. It is that narrow path you speak of.

So you see true temperance comes through the Holy Spirit, not in how one may only think they are Lust free when actually they are not:
Gal 5:16 But I say, Walk in the Spirit, and you will not fulfill the lust of the flesh.

Sodomy, oral, anal, stripping, tempting of the eye, etc etc for the sake of foreplay as its called or to fulfill the lust of flesh is not in the spirit at all so how can it be called Temperance when there is no humility? An incomplete or imperfect virtue at best.

This is why the Church teaches the unitive nature of marital relations is a result of its greater purpose which is procreation but all to often people bring forth Children in Lust so then it's not hard to see why they are confused. They have it backward. Those who do so may not know God at all, they only think they do:
1Th 4:5 not in passion of lust, even as also the nations do, not knowing God;

Scripture says Lust can actually amount to idolatry:
Col 3:5 Then put to death your members which are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil lust, and covetousness, which is idolatry;

In short Lust brings forth sin and death:
Jas 1:15 Then having conceived lust brings forth sin. And sin being fully formed brings forth death.

As a celibate bachelor I have escaped the world in this respect. Not because my religion is imbalanced but because it is fulfilled and I have obeyed the Lord:
2Pe 1:4 by which means He has given to us the very great and precious promises, so that through these you might be partakers of the divine nature, escaping from the corruption in the world by lust.

To say anything less would be to give into the pride of selfism:
1Jn 2:16 because all that which is in the world: the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

Jesus said:
Mat 5:28 But I say to you, Everyone looking at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

You do understand this all would mean indulgence of the eye is Lust as well. Certainly not something to encourage ones husband to do I would think as that Lust may very well then be carried outside of the marriage.

Yet some have already committed that they prefer to capitalize upon the weakness of a mans eye, mistakenly thinking that is a gift (when its clear scripture tells us to mortify such a passion for the sake of the kingdom) and would rather their husbands not have the salvation of their souls in mind in the bedroom (clearly Lust) and it appears they haven't his either. Little true love there sister. The flesh passes away in a short time but the soul is eternal. Which is paramount in importance? Its obvious ones hope is sincerely in eternal life in not of this world.
1Jn 2:17 And the world is passing away, and its lust. But the one doing the will of God abides forever.

Peace and God bless sister.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Joab- you have the experience of disordered physical desire--and as such you will likely end up way on one side of the spectrum. I hope that you have enough self-honesty to recognise that.

WHether you like it or not--God created us body and soul. Whether you like it or not, marriage is an act of body and soul. Whether you like it or not, sex is body and soul. God made sex pleasurable, He made men visually stimulated by women's bodies, He made the [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] there for no other reason than for pleasure and that woman's [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] aids the sperm in reaching the ovum-should there be one--but at the same time made it that there most often needs to be some other stimulus than penetration for a woman to climax, He made it so that women, generally, cannot just boom! go when husband is ready for sex-but rather that women physiologically (there's that body, again) need physical stimulation before sex to be ready for sex. He made it so that the hormones released during sex, and particularly through [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] are hormones which actually make us feel more loving--oxytocin. With men the levels of those hormones increase as their desire is prolonged before climax. God made it all that way...not me....

And for all of you "he'll take that lust outside of marriage" folks--in our case- first I assert that physically desirousness of your spouse is NOT the same thing as lust--because physically desiring your spouse is a desire of body and soul-and not just of body....but rather in our marriage it was exactly opposite. When I ardently felt sex was merely a soul activity--negating that it is body and soul and recognising how God made man and woman...that was when there were wandering eyes....but since having recognised that sex is a body and soul activity (and cannot be separated)- I have my husband's absolute fidelity.

You equate physical desire for one's spouse with lust-- I do not---therefore all the Scripture in the world rallying against lust is pointless in this discussion.

ALL of the captial sins are a peversion of a good....lust is the perversion of properly ordered physical desire for one's spouse. Lust involves an objectification of a spouse and a removal of their body from their soul--from the entirety as a person. It is just as harmful to remove a soul from a body.

It is good for us to desire food- God made it so that taste/smell/ texture is an important aspect of eating...it becomes gluttony when we pervert that need for food- and either consume too much or divorce too much the pleasure which food gives us from it's basic intended purpose, which is nourishment. It becomes gluttony when we focus only on the pleasure which eating gives us, when it becomes focused inwards upon our wants and desires. It is the same with sex--it is a good for a spouse to desire to have sex with their spouse. It becomes lust, when we pervert that need for sex with our spouse--and either desire it too muh, or divorce sex from it's intended purpose--which is ordered to making the two one flesh, and to bonding there souls together. It becomes lust when we only focus on the pleasure which sex gives us, when it becomes focused inward only upon ourselves and wants.
 
Upvote 0

JoabAnias

Steward of proportionality- I Cor 13:1, 1 Tim 3:15
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2007
21,200
3,283
✟105,374.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You equate physical desire for one's spouse with lust-- I do not---therefore all the Scripture in the world rallying against lust is pointless in this discussion.

I don't equate all physical desire with Lust. Thats ridiculous and I am not a stoic or aesthetic monk. I venture into the world and know exactly what the difference is between love and lust. I chose dignity as best I can. I won't debase myself, simple as that. I have had my fill. As I told you, I have grown children.

I make the point that Lust within marriage IS possible and there IS a difference that most married couples haven't given a thought at all, especially the ones who are stripping and doing lewd base acts to each other.

I accept human nature for what it is. Nevertheless its part of our lower nature. I strive to rise above my lower nature because God calls me to. I think He calls us all to but it comes with maturity, in different degrees and at different times according to the wisdom of the Holy Spirit. Not all will see it at the same time.

Its a shame all the scripture in the world is pointless in a discussion of Lust for you. Isn't that what one calls apostasy? I mean when they set themselves above scripture and just blow it off? Oh well, whatever, you will understand it one day, just like I did. ;)

By the way, thanks for diagnosing me on an informal internet forum. Talk about pointless in discussion. ^_^ How proud we get of our snideness eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anglian
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Once again- you entirely miss the point...throwing Scripture about lust at me--when I am not talking about lust--but properly ordered physical desire for one's spouse is pointless.

You find acts base that other spouses might find mutually agreeable and not forbidden--that's fine...but just because you find taking one's clothes off in a provocative lustful in the context of spousal sex--doesn't mean that everyone does. You had a sex addiction-not everyone needs to be as vigilant as you might need to be--just as someone with a past drug addiction will need to be more vigililant with which pain medications they might take.

I didn't presume to "diagnose" you--I recalled you saying previously that you are a recovering sex addict.

One age old tidbit--"Pride goeth before the fall".
 
Upvote 0

JoabAnias

Steward of proportionality- I Cor 13:1, 1 Tim 3:15
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2007
21,200
3,283
✟105,374.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Once again- you entirely miss the point...throwing Scripture about lust at me--when I am not talking about lust--but properly ordered physical desire for one's spouse is pointless.

You find acts base that other spouses might find mutually agreeable and not forbidden--that's fine...but just because you find taking one's clothes off in a provocative lustful in the context of spousal sex--doesn't mean that everyone does. You had a sex addiction-not everyone needs to be as vigilant as you might need to be--just as someone with a past drug addiction will need to be more vigililant with which pain medications they might take.

I didn't presume to "diagnose" you--I recalled you saying previously that you are a recovering sex addict.

One age old tidbit--"Pride goeth before the fall".

Ah, bingo, now your making more sense when you allude to there being a difference in state in life and the calling to that particular state. You see there is only one married state and that doesn't apply to everyone does it? Yet I have had that vocation too and it ended and I found a new calling and though I had my part to play in that I hope to think the Lord has answered my prayers and showed me the errors that led to it.

Its natural for one who is known to be chaste to appear prudish to one who is not chaste or visa v. Totally aside from possible lust it doesn't mean either are the case. There is very much affection and love in my life. More than when I wasn't chaste and married in fact. The gift of chastity has been the greatest gift of healing in my life, both spiritually and emotionally.

By the way your presumption about my condition is just that, presumption. You know nothing of the circumstances or the lessons learned there from God himself and you also presume to know the difference which is not yet evident. Your snideness of making this personal is concerning but I have nothing to be ashamed of and I can roll with it though you may not like it.

You refuse to listen to the Scripture so there isn't much more I can say if you don't find lust after you by your own husband to be dangerous. I hope you aren't put to the test for your own sake because it will be your own fault if your deluding yourself about this. (I am not saying you are either, just asking you to be sure for your families sake).

I have found respect for the souls of women and wouldn't think of doing anything to jeopardize that and they don't have to be my wife to care about that. Yet you continue to try and convince me that Love is something it isn't because of God knows why but its not going to happen. I tell you the difference because I care about your soul. Your flesh is irrelevant to me.

I have known several women who mistakenly think the only way they can feel pretty or win a man is by tempting him to lust after her. I tell you thats a sham contrary to her true dignity and his true love. They don't know their own worth and its sad so they objectify themselves and then blame the man if he is wayward. What do they expect? The flesh industry is booming.

I know this because of what I have been through but I guess you know better because your little erotica shows work for you but I can tell you we had the same attitude within my marriage and it turned out to be a BIG mistake. So, it seems we have an impass. One from where I speak common sense and you speak from self gratification disguised as making your man happy.

I will also tell you if I adopted your mindset there is no way I could maintain chastity in the single life and would be seeking fornication like the rest of society, also the same mindset, combined with the constant media barrage of sexual innuendo made it even a struggle to maintain fidelity within marriage. Why do you think guys turn to Porn anyway?

There is much to be gleaned from Christ saying:
Mat 5:28 But I say to you, Everyone looking at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

One has to take that to heart and let it transform their lives or risk being unworthy. Yes, you can commit adultery with your wife and once you have you will do it with anyone even if its only with the eyes.

You have the opportunity here to learn from ones experience with that very passage but you have to choose to listen. If you don't well there is no narrow path at all.

Lastly addiction and disorder is addiction and disorder. There is no such thing as a smaller than an other addiction just because one has gone further than another. Sure one may not step out on their wife because she entices them to lust but any amount of lust is disorder and some addicts are born and others are made but most everyone is an addict to something. Think about it. Just because sin hasn't consumed someone yet doesn't mean it never will. All sin is death and no amount of lack of it is religious addiction.

But your right about one thing, eventually nothing will satisfy. What then? ;) More temperate lust? I suppose I could just do a little drugs right? :doh:

Peace and God bless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anglian
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Umm--yeah-- I am chaste, perhaps you meant celibate?? One can't commit adultery with one's own wife--as adultery is sex with another person not your spouse. I DO NOT refuse to listen to Scripture--you have yet to post any Scripture which is pertinent to two married people mutually pleasuring each other during, before and after sex.

Ahhh- yes it becomes all clear now--you are not married--NFPing and all that Catholic razz ma taz.....I get it now.

I merely made a comment several of my posts back--that because of what I remembered you saying about your recovery---that you are likely to have more stingent views about what constitutes lust. That is not a slam--I have had very good friends who were recovering sex addicts--even a dear priest friend-who was possibly the holiest person I have ever met, and one of the absolute most humble by far. I have had alcoholics and drug addicts around me, now that I think about it, in surprising number. I think 12 Steps are soooo fab--and I think they can be extrapolated so very, very well to the path toward holiness (which if you've missed my posts in here- I think is wholeness).

Everyone who enjoys good tasting food doesn't become addicted to food--just as everyone who has physical desire for their spouse doesn't become a sex addict, not is every person in the world consumed by lust--there's a whole slew of capital sins just awaiting out there for us--we don't all fall prey to the same ones, you know? For some reason you think you are holier than me (which is I am sure, not being snide, very true) but how in the heck does that help you- that's just another capital sin. Spiritual pride is a pitfall.

That you don't care about me as a human- body and soul, spirit and FLESH--is very telling. They aren't separate--my flesh will be reunited to my spirit someday--I care about it- and not being created as an angel, God seems to care about it, too. We cannot divorce the two- no matter how much we wish--for the very nature of our creation, the whole basis for sacramental theology- is seen and unseen.

Ironically- I am hyper-sensitive about being objectified, I am hyper sensitive about women being sexually objectified. Having been raped and misused badly ( and all that's ensuing counselling), I know deeply and clearly the difference between body/soul love and objectified sex. It is probably the reason I posted in here at all--I cannot aide women being made to feel like they need to be ashamed of things, for which they do not need to be ashamed. I do not need to be ashamed of my body, nor hide it from my husband--it is absolutely entirely his--you know, being one flesh and all. I also know well, very well, what the Church teaches and does not teach about sex within the confines of marriage...if you choose to use a more strict parameter for yourself to teach and preach- well that's your choice--but it is not the Church's current views.

If you haven't you really ought to spend time studying the Theology of the Body.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Mar 13, 2008
60
5
41
✟22,706.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I also know well, very well, what the Church teaches and does not teach about sex within the confines of marriage...if you choose to use a more strict parameter for yourself to teach and preach- well that's your choice--but it is not the Church's current views.

Oh yeah? I bet you ten bucks that neither Pope Benedict nor any of the Saints thinks that doing a strip-tease for your husband is morally acceptable.
 
Upvote 0

isabella1

All is in God's hand!
Nov 23, 2007
6,117
1,229
Home
✟27,618.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Once again- you entirely miss the point...throwing Scripture about lust at me--when I am not talking about lust--but properly ordered physical desire for one's spouse is pointless.

You find acts base that other spouses might find mutually agreeable and not forbidden--that's fine...but just because you find taking one's clothes off in a provocative lustful in the context of spousal sex--doesn't mean that everyone does. You had a sex addiction-not everyone needs to be as vigilant as you might need to be--just as someone with a past drug addiction will need to be more vigililant with which pain medications they might take.

I didn't presume to "diagnose" you--I recalled you saying previously that you are a recovering sex addict.

One age old tidbit--"Pride goeth before the fall".
This is starting to turn my stomach! It gets me sick, that other people who read this may think that lust within a marriage is part of Gods plan and is somehow permissible to him. There have been many scriptures provided now to back up that lust is wrong in any situation. If anyone wants to know Gods plan for a marriage just read the Song of Songs by Solomon. There is no mention of lusting after each other in that, or being provocative and lustful in a striptease.

I will add here that I have no sexual addictions, and was married for twenty years, and what is being said is flat out wrong. Taking ones clothes off in a provocative and lustful manner for your spouse is nothing more that LUST! I went through all the things you did too Shannon, and feel I can also point women in the direction of what real love and passion within a marriage is, and lust just distorts and breaks down that marriage eventually. A marriage rooted in lust will always eventually break down. The lust only got worse, and spills out on all other areas of our lives. Then eventually can lead to other women, porn, or even a husband getting arouse by looking at other women in your community, because everything is hanging out of them.

My x was not Catholic nor did he care to know what the Church teaches about a true marital loving relationship that God intended, especially in the bedroom. He believed God didn't belong in the bedroom. Just like you mentioned Shannon, you hope your husband was not thinking about God when he watches you do your striptease. I was afraid in my marriage that if I pushed the issue of what the Church teaches in the marital bed (because he did not understand the Catholic teachings), that he would go looking elsewhere. Are you afraid of this Shannon and thats why you are so resistant in admitting lust in a marital bed is sin? Hum... I wonder... I used to do all those things for my x too, and much, much more. Just to appease his lustful desires and appetite. Guess what, it did not matter anyhow!!!

Bravo for you Joab for your recovery, no matter how small or large your addiction was. Your stand is one for the Kingdom of Heaven, and that of helping souls trying to achieve Holiness together as Husband and Wife within the sacrament of marriage. I for thank you for your comments, and the strength it takes to admit ones faults openly. That is a sign of humility not pride. It was stated to you incorrect.
 
Upvote 0

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,951
10,060
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟597,590.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I'll read the rest in a minute--but it's interesting that your immediate reaction is that I am making light of addicition, and asume that I actually know nothing of addicition, or specifically a(I am assuming) aout your particular addiction. YOu are wrong on all accounts.

I think many people, indeed, are religious addicts--and because of the denial aspect of addiction are unable to see the intemperate nature and disordered expression of that. I do ABSOLUTELY think that there is (obviously) a healthy relationship with religion- and moreso that holiness is all about right relationship- with Trinity and with of brothers and sisters....most people don't want to do the work of growing in wholeness-and that, to me, is why the path to heaven is narrow.

I believe, but not sure if it was La Salette or Myrna...
[They are the more recent reads so forgive]
Anyway...Jesus takes holiness way more seriously than the priests.

So, i dont think anyone can be 'too addicted' to religion.
I think Jesus is disgusted that no one is these days... actually.

And i know i read He wants zeal... but according to this world, zeal is an ugly word that should be avoided.
Shame on those who want to be holy.

As for sex...
Not my business and i so dont wanna know.

I honestly thot tho that JPll said oral was ok [as foreplay], but copulation must end within a woman's womb.
:o Now why did i think that...i am sure i was told this way way back when....

 
Upvote 0
Ok, let me first say that I'm tired as heel and usually don't go into threads like this, NFP, etc..

I find myself agreeing with Shannon, a few others and even GlobalNomad. The way I understand it, sex is an act of procreation/love, of giving one's self in an extraordinary manner. Just my opinion, but I don't see why a little oral sex, if done between a man and wife in the proper context, could not be permissable to some extent. Is it wrong to touch with the hands and body for the purpose of love/procreation? Is it wrong to use the mouth to kiss a spouse, on the hand, cheek or the lips, to show affection -- rather than as a perversion of giving in love or as a lustful act? Where do we draw the line? At what point does a kiss become 'sodomy' or the caress become it become 'improper'? At what point does it change from love to lust? I'm not speaking here of lust, but of love in the proper context and to a certain extent.

Granted I may be wrong and there must be a line somewhere, but where?


This was only my opinion..

+Mark
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gwendolyn
Upvote 0

isabella1

All is in God's hand!
Nov 23, 2007
6,117
1,229
Home
✟27,618.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ok, let me first say that I'm tired as heel and usually don't go into threads like this, NFP, etc..

I find myself agreeing with Shannon, a few others and even GlobalNomad. The way I understand it, sex is an act of procreation/love, of giving one's self in an extraordinary manner. Just my opinion, but I don't see why a little oral sex, if done between a man and wife in the proper context, could not be permissable to some extant. Is it wrong to touch with the hands and body for the purpose of love/procreation? Is it wrong to use the mouth to kiss a spouse, on the hand, cheek or the lips, to show affection -- rather than as a perversion of giving in love or as a lustful act? Where do we draw the line? At what point does a kiss become 'sodomy' or the caress become it become improper? At what point does it change from love to lust? I'm not speaking here of lust, but of love in the proper context and to a certain extent.

Granted I may be wrong and there must be a line somewhere, but where?


This was only my opinion..

+Mark
I do agree with you in what you said! But there are things that can become lustful within a marriage. I experienced it first hand. And have seen it in many other marriages (first hand).
 
Upvote 0
I do agree with you in what you said! But there are things that can become lustful within a marriage. I experienced it first hand. And have seen it in many other marriages (first hand).
,


I know, and I agree with you. But even in regular - straight forward sex, the same is also true, it can be for pure lust, and this I know first hand.




+
 
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Oh yeah? I bet you ten bucks that neither Pope Benedict nor any of the Saints thinks that doing a strip-tease for your husband is morally acceptable.
You explain to me why in the privacy of our own bedroom, it is morally unacceptable for me to willingly, provocatively remove my clothes for my husband as foreplay? Seriously--explain it... should I undress in the closet? What about having the lights on during sex--is that morally unacceptable, too--because heaven forbid my husband actually see my body???

It's not like there is any "requirement" for me to undress provocatively to have sex--or for there to be anything other than a quiet moment when all the kids are not underfoot...if there was some sense of having to be visually provocative in order for us to have sex--well that beings to move into the disordered...rather it's just something that keeps sex from starting to seem like yet another obligation of family life. It is okay- for sex to be fun....it can be fun, because lol! well- that's unitive and creative...(I know that's not what creative means here).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.