Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
hmm. My bible doesn't come with parenthetical statements.
so how do you know which sciences are "good" and which are "bad"?
If it cannot be disproven, then it becomes tested again and again, until it becomes a scientific theory, to be tested again and again and again, until it becomes scientific law.
The timeline of Global Warming does not coincide with the Industrial Revolution or Automobiles at all. Here we will learn briefly about Global Warming, how satellites work, the principles behind the microwave radio frequency, and how Orbiting Satellites and Earth satellite antennas are causing Global RF Heating.
During the last 15 years the earth has rapidly increased in temperature and a great portion of the polar ice caps have melted away. This fact has caused great alarm all over the world. Scientists have been puzzled about how the temperature is increasing. One global warming theory is the "Green house Gas" theory.
The Greenhouse Gas Theory is scientifically wrong. The industrial Revolution happened at the beginning of the 1800's. Yet, the 1950's is when Global Warming became an issue. The timeline of Global Warming does not coincide with the Industrial Revolution or Automobiles at all.
Global Warming history completely coincides with the history of artificial satellites and the use of microwave frequencies. Today there are Satellite TV, Internet, GPS trackers, Cell phones and a host of other uses that are increasing by the day with each of these products having millions of subscribers. Direct TV alone has 16.8 Million customers. The amount of microwave transmissions entering our atmosphere is staggering. It is not just a few hundred.
The above image demonstrates how microwave transmissions work with the environment. Microwaves scatter THROUGH the atmosphere whereas solar radiation does not. As the microwaves penetrate to the surface, the water, ice, and atmosphere absorb the microwaves. This causes friction in the ice and water at the molecular level. This friction causes heat which is called Radio Frequency Heating. This is a fact not a Theory and is the basic principle behind the Microwave Oven. Click here for a great explanation of Radio Frequency Heating.
ANTENNAS DO NOT SHOOT STRAIGHT LINES BUT SPHERICALLY IN EVERY DIRECTION! THE WAVES ARE HITTING EVERYTHING NOT JUST ANTENNAS.
Global Warming is caused by the use of UHF and higher frequencies at an enormous rate. Greenhouse gases are not the cause of global warming and cutting Greenhouse gasses will NEVER stop Global Warming.
Well I at least agree with the part in red...
http://globalmicrowave.orgfree.com/
The Greenhouse Gas Theory is scientifically wrong. The industrial Revolution happened at the beginning of the 1800's. Yet, the 1950's is when Global Warming became an issue. The timeline of Global Warming does not coincide with the Industrial Revolution or Automobiles at all.
Wow.
um...here......1900's.....a small amunt of gas is produced....now....a TON of gas is produced. I don't understand what you mean by suggesting global warming hasn't become an issue until after more and more green-house gases were produced.....of course global warming did become an issue until our world was a million more times polluted; this much is true. You're verifying fact you seem to be disagreeing with.
If you're suggesting microwaves cause global warming/climate change, then humans DO induce it with said microwaves.
Keep spreading ignorance, and people will become ignorant.
We don't want that.
Well....some do....not me.....
No I am suggesting the greenhouse gas theory is just as wrong as the microwave theory.
The loss of our earths magnetic field is causing global warming and God is causing the loss of that field.
men cannot control the climate or destroy it.
Sigh... See: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/12/the_australians_war_on_science_29.php
Christopher Booker is either lacking knowledge or a liar. THough given his personal history (Criticism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker), it's probably a mix of the two.
Sigh... See: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/12/the_australians_war_on_science_29.php
Christopher Booker is either lacking knowledge or a liar. THough given his personal history (Criticism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker), it's probably a mix of the two.
No more or less reputable than an editorial.
As reputable as its author.A blog is a reputable source?
Yes. The good Wiki articles are well sourced so you can look up the citations and read the original sources.It can be. There are names, dates, places, just whole host of things you can google if what it says does not agree with facts you know to be true. As a single or an end source Wiki falls short, I guess unless it is in agreement with what you know to be fact,
Wikipedia and Dan rather two sources you can trust.
My colleagues and I at work use wiki all the time for general information. I wouldn't use it as a source in a paper, I'd just follow the included citations for that, but it's a darn convenient tool. Yay for wiki.As reputable as its author.
Yes. The good Wiki articles are well sourced so you can look up the citations and read the original sources.
My colleagues and I at work use wiki all the time for general information. I wouldn't use it as a source in a paper, I'd just follow the included citations for that, but it's a darn convenient tool. Yay for wiki.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?