Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No but seriously, if it comes down to who will be a potential partners mate, you will give me center stage because I am more adapted than you?
You still don't know anything about evolution, nor biology, or even science in general.
Do you actually make any attempt to learn?
Why can I not cash in, on Evolution?
Is there some rule, that Evolution is for looking not touching?
You are saying you are happy to be useless?
I just said "A lack of wisdom teeth is not a trait that leads to sexual selection".No but seriously, if it comes down to who will be a potential partners mate, you will give me center stage because I am more adapted than you?
You realise this destroys the notion of the Nash Equilibrium?
I'm not trying to corner you, maybe Evolution isn't something that develops out of a partnership? Like the entire species would have to put people like me first, before we would see wisdom teeth removed? You would do that? Even if you have wisdom teeth?
Not to worry. Science has your back bro. Just get some of the product in this video and you will be golden:Why can I not cash in, on Evolution?
Is there some rule, that Evolution is for looking not touching?
You are saying you are happy to be useless?
I just said "A lack of wisdom teeth is not a trait that leads to sexual selection".
If I advertise my lack of wisdom teeth, it is a sexual selective relevant trait?
But I agree, cutting branches off the tree does not necessitate mutation of the tree to compensate, it simply means that the tree will have to respond to other selection pressures, to make up for the branches it does not have.
It is the seed that determines the tree's survival, not its branches.
I've said no multiple times. It's really not a particularly appealing trait.If I advertise my lack of wisdom teeth, it is a sexual selective relevant trait?
As a species yes. Mutation is not relevant to a tree during its life.But I agree, cutting branches off the tree does not necessitate mutation of the tree to compensate, it simply means that the tree will have to respond to other selection pressures, to make up for the branches it does not have.
It is the seed that determines the tree's survival, not its branches.
But the branches of a tree do help determine a tree's survival.
On the basis of the seed!
You saw just now, here, that you were not providing "foundation" (when it was needed).
What I think you confuse, is that the branch is able to change the seed, via the tree.
You want to say "No, I have survival in the variety of branches" as if you do not have to give account of what it meant to the seed - this is deceptive?
Except that branches of a tree allow a tree to have leaves. If a tree does not have leaves, it cannot photosynthesize and it will die.
Branches also allow a tree to grow seeds to grow more trees.
No amount of branching, is ever going to change the seed, from it's type.
The best you can hope to say is that with enough trimming, the tree can be made to look like something it wasn't originally intended to be.
You seem to live in a fantasy world where with the right selection pressures, any tree can become any other tree.
And why do you not back up your theory, when it is needed? If I am more "evolved", speak up! Help me use it to my advantage?
In the faith, we defer to the one who wants to serve, we don't get in his way - what good would it be if we said "no, don't serve"?
I have no wisdom teeth and that is evolved, you therefore be ready to acknowledge it?
No, it wasn't because that doesn't make sense.But that is what it was called: "more evolution". No wisdom teeth was called "more evolution".
Irrelevant.
[...]Your phrase "more evolution", does not make sense.
Even the phrase "more evolved" when talking about individuals in the same population does not make sense.
To be born without wisdom teeth is possibly an advantageous trait... that does not make it a sexually selected trait.
You are trying to prescribe that they do not make sense?
Because no one cares whether or not their partner was born with wisdom teeth... and no one can even tell.Why not?
That sentence doesn't make sense, because the phrase "greater Evolution" doesn't make sense.You are unwilling to vouch for greater Evolution?
What about Jesus?
You are unwilling to vouch for His obedience having a greater effect on Mankind?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?