It says:
What you're not looking at is how these young people actually interact with one another when they are not being "facilitated" by their elders.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This super liberal gen-z is more in favor of restricting freedom of speech than any generation before it...
First Amendment vitals: Taking Gen Z’s pulse on free expression and inclusion
But never mind that....racial segregation...
Racial Segregation On American Campuses: A Widespread Phenomenon
So while they claim to support diversity and inclusion...they actually support racial exclusion and segregation.
That's because they think these two concepts are the same thing.
Your poll would be more useful if it started off by seeing if respondents can actually identify liberal values. Anyone can call themselves a liberal, but it doesn't mean much if you aren't promoting liberal values.
College administrators facilitate this by constantly harping on race. They hire "diversity" coordinators in large numbers to check on the racial complexion of students, faculty, other staff and even contractors.
But never mind that....racial segregation...
triggered?No, it's because of her incompetence. Anyone who gets "triggered" by the required IRS forms for a non-profit should not be leading that non-profit.
and what exactly is her bad character here?This is where things get confusing. MLK suggested a person's character was more important than skin color. Hence who you are matters more. Good point. Then BLM and other recent trends turn things back into a matter of skin, reversing MLK's view. But as soon as someone comes into question now it is said the person has come into question over skin color, rather than character. So bring back the color issue in order to once again claim racism over character? Isn't that a step backwards when a person's bad character regardless of skin color gets a pass or condemnation due to skin be it black or white?
No. Asking what racism is, is an extremely dumb question. Because we all know what racism is.
The questions (plural) that we need to answer - and a lot of people have been thinking about them over the last couple of years, are those that ask in what circumstances can something be described as racist.
So the point that you just raised is then a valid one. In what circumstances were the comments made?
What intent was there in making them?
Is intent a necessary requisite for a racist statement?
Is the ethnic background of the woman partly responsible for the comment?
Do personal preferences need to be considered?
If the person who makes any comment an obvious racist does that cloud the issue?
Can we separate obvious divisions in society on racial grounds?
If the person making the comment is the same ethnic backround as the person to whom the comments are addressed, can it still be called racist?
Does any good that a racist does balance any racist comments?
Those are just some questions we could address on one single example of one comment. There are probably a lot more. And most are probably germane to other examples.
And the problem is that we might agree on some and not agree on others. So there's a lot of grey areas. This is not generally a black and white matter (with very obvious exceptions).
But I think that before we even start examining any example of potential racism, then we'd be expected to know what racism actually was in order for us to be able to discuss, debate and determine whether it is or is not.
By design by whom? "Black Lives Matter" developed as a meme. We were chanting it in the streets before it was the name of an organization, and people have chanted it that have no affiliation to said organization. It’s the rallying cry of a movement and anyone involved has experienced it as such. The fact that a few women decided to try and claim that motto as the name for their organization doesn’t change that. Did you read the letter the 10 chapters sent back in 2020?it's certainly "confusing", but I think that was by design for the reasons mentioned in prior posts.
I thought we all knew what racism was, according to you.
yepYou say that as if I didn't do exactly those things when all this started.
let's see...you said:No...I got it from reality.
Trayvon Martin was murdered by a police officer?"....preferably by police"
is it reality to use a racist stereotype to play up the fears of some people?.never by another black citizen.
Implying that somehow racism never has anything to do with it and is something black people don't experience. White people on the other hand are often the victims of racism."Claim racism is the cause of Step 1."
because racism isn't real, its just something black people make up to excuse their many short comings. Like the black person not getting hired, that couldn't possibly be because of racism. Even though research has shown that if an applicant is perceived to be black they are many times less likely to even get a job interview .. which of course isn't racism.3. Claim to be fighting racism. Does not require any actual racism, or even a working definition of racism.
Regular people? you mean white people.4. Play off the guilt and shame of regular people
you mean like what you are doing here?by blaming them or absolving them of blame based on the color of their skin.
you don't seem to worriedDon't worry about if this is racist
Tamir Rice? You mean the 12 year old child that was killed by who ....exactly? it couldn't have been a white police officer because the never happens. It must have been another black person because that is what black people do. Either way I'm sure racism had nothing to do with it.I can quote the families of people like Tamir Rice calling her out as a scam artist.
That's the 1.4 million dollar mansion....don't forget to include the other two mansions she bought. I'm not counting the one in California or the one in Canada either.
I don't think this counts as a mansion in anyone's book. But who cares as long as you can make some fake accusations about embezzlement.
and you are trying to conflate the twoSeems like they're trying to have it both ways... they want to claim "the chapters operate autonomously" and "it's not directed by one person or group" (when trying to distance themselves from something bad members of a particular chapter may do)
evidence?And here's the problem with that...
When someone sees a local chapter of BLM protesting whatever they think is a worthy cause....who do they donate to?
If they go online and donate to Black Lives Matter....they aren't donating to the local chapter or its cause.
Evidence? oh wait....you don't need evidence because she's blackShe's raking in the profit off the work of people foolish enough to propagate her message.
to manyWhat's the number of black people murdered in cold blood by cops?
citation that she called it racist?This is demonstrably false.
Here is the report Patrisse Cullors called racist:
Black Lives Matter Secretly Bought a $6 Million House
Please point out the racist part of the report. It should be easy, since we all know what racism is, apparently.
to many
let's see...you said:
"Step 1, find viral incident of dead black person Well the reality here is someone who is murdered
Trayvon Martin was murdered by a police officer?
is it reality to use a racist stereotype to play up the fears of some people?
Implying that somehow racism never has anything to do with it
because racism isn't real, its just something black people make up to excuse their many short comings. Like the black person not getting hired, that couldn't possibly be because of racism. Even though research has shown that if an applicant is perceived to be black they are many times less likely to even get a job interview .. which of course isn't racism.
Regular people? you mean white people.
you mean like what you are doing here?
you don't seem to worried
Success means that you are able to collect money from people who want to "help" and use that money to buy yourself mansion....any evidence to support this claim? But then you don't need any evidence. because obviously a black person can't earn their own money
Tamir Rice?
good for them, then. I don't mean that ironically. I mean, among other things, I learned that you never ever ever fink or tattletale, no matter what the other person has done. I grew up in, not a boarding school dominated by gangs, per se, but with many former gang members or ones which had formed their own gang at the school. the former gang members included my best friend, who had belonged to a white Irish gang, versus a black one. some of this programming has still stayed with me, even though I never belonged to a gang.But culture is a choice, and some do choose otherwise.
any thing greater than zero is to many...or are you suggesting that there is a reasonable number for how many black people can be murdered?What's the number though?
Anyone reading what @RDKirk wrote knew full well what he meant by the term segregation as used in his post. Including yourself.
That you can try to link that term as it was used to Gen Z by linking to an article that is describing the result of a generally accepted diversity in colleges (which isn't restricted to ethnic background but also covers gender, sexuality identity and culture) and which has nothing whatsoever to do with the term as used in that post, is more a reflection of your attitudes than anything to do with the racial attitudes of Gen Z.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?