Sin & Sickness

[Nathan Poe]

actually in biblical student will now that line is not in the earliest manuscripts, so it is most likely put in there by editorilizing

IOW, somebody tampered with the Bible? Someone way back when put words into Christ's mouth?

You realize that by implying this, you've opened up a can o' worms in the credibility department; the Bible is no longer divinely inspired if it can be "editorialized" so easily...

 

[LorentzHA]

actually in biblical student will now that line is not in the earliest manuscripts, so it is most likely put in there by editorilizing

Hmmmmm (scratching head)...I wonder what else has been put in by "editorializing". How do you know what has and what has not???

 

[Godzman]

IOW, somebody tampered with the Bible? Someone way back when put words into Christ's mouth?

You realize that by implying this, you've opened up a can o' worms in the credibility department; the Bible is no longer divinely inspired if it can be "editorialized" so easily...

lol, the earliest manuscripts are the most reliable, the claim of infallibility only applies to the orignal texts.

 

[Godzman]

Hmmmmm (scratching head)...I wonder what else has been put in by "editorializing". How do you know what has and what has not???

bilbical archaelogy

 

[Phred]

he could have said both

No, he couldn't have. Then one wouldn't be 'last'.

"It is finished." (John 19:30)

"My God, my God, why have you forsaken me!" (Mark 15:34-5 and Matthew 27:46)

"Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit." (Luke 23:46)


Apologize for it all you wish, it's called a "contradiction".

 

[Nathan Poe]

lol, the earliest manuscripts are the most reliable, the claim of infallibility only applies to the orignal texts.

And where are those "original texts" now? Why are they not copied? How come Christians today are using a corrupted version of the "Word of God?"

 

[Jet Black]

IOW, somebody tampered with the Bible? Someone way back when put words into Christ's mouth?

You realize that by implying this, you've opened up a can o' worms in the credibility department; the Bible is no longer divinely inspired if it can be "editorialized" so easily...

someone will claim that it was divinely editorialised. you mark my words.

 

[Jet Black]

bilbical archaelogy

heh, using science to figure out what is and isn't true about the bible. Next you will be a theistic evolutionist.

 

[ej]

What does 'bilbical' mean?

 

[ej]

From www.dictionary.com:

No entry found for bilbical.

Did you mean biblical?

Suggestions:
biblical
bilabial
biblically
bellical
bulbil
biological
bilabially


For better results, try our search tips.

 

[Nathan Poe]

someone will claim that it was divinely editorialised. you mark my words.

Consider them marked.

 

[Jet Black]

From www.dictionary.com:

while you are at it:

No entry found for archaelogy.

Did you mean archaeology?

Suggestions:
archaeology
archelogy
archeology
archae logy
archae-logy

For better results, try our search tips.

 

[Godzman]

while you are at it:

while your at it search for historiamus, just wondering what you guys are

 

[Jet Black]

"you're" as in "you are" - not your.

No entry found for historiamus.

Did you mean histograms?

Suggestions:
histograms
haustorium's
histogram's
histories
haustoria's


For better results, try our search tips.

 

[ej]

while your at it search for historiamus, just wondering what you guys are

Whilst you are at it = you're not your

 

[LorentzHA]

From www.dictionary.com:

...

 

[ej]

[/B]

has everything stopped being bold?

 

[LorentzHA]

bilbical archaelogy

Where are most Bilbicals found??

 

[LorentzHA]

[/B]

has everything stopped being bold?

No, not me...