Should the 19th Amendment Be Repealed?

[Hammster]

You're only hearing that because you are not listening carefully. Some voter ID laws are bad because they are being imposed by people who think it will be harder for some groups to get them than others.

Okay.

 

[Hammster]

Exactly. Here Jesus was specifically speaking to Jews about Jewish religious law, not Roman civil law.

His law supersedes Roman law.

Matthew 28:18

 

[Hammster]

Your 11 year old never had a right to vote; he isn't losing anything. American citizens, whether they own property or not, have a right to vote. They are enfranchised. If you take away non-property owners' right to vote, then they become disenfranchised.

No, because it will no longer be legal. Disenfranchisement is denying something from someone who has the right to it.

 

[BCP1928]

His law supersedes Roman law.

Matthew 28:18

For His followers it does indeed. Just as it does now.

 

[JosephZ]

No, because it will no longer be legal. Disenfranchisement is denying something from someone who has the right to it.

The costitution gives non-property owners the right to vote. Making a law that would prevent non-property owners from voting would be a perfect example of disenfranchisement.

 

[dogs4thewin]

The feminist movement has done much damage to this country. They took us from a country of families to a country of individuals. That’s not even close to biblical, and it worked. We have legalized abortion because of the women’s suffrage movement, a movement that a large percentage of women were against.

So yes, this needs to go.

This country was NOT founded as a Christian nation and frankly unless people are crazy you would not want a "Christian" nation why? because EVERY time a government based on relgion has been tried in this fallen world it has failed BADLY. I may respond more later I am leaving the house now.

 

[Hammster]

For His followers it does indeed. Just as it does now.

He has all authority.

 

[Hammster]

The costitution gives non-property owners the right to vote. Making a law that would prevent non-property owners from voting would be a perfect example of disenfranchisement.

Where does it do that?

 

[Hammster]

This country was NOT founded as a Christian nation and frankly unless people are crazy you would not want a "Christian" nation why? because EVERY time a government based on relgion has been tried in this fallen world it has failed BADLY. I may respond more later I am leaving the house now.

It was, and you’ll either have God’s laws or Satan’s.

 

[BCP1928]

It was, and you’ll either have God’s laws or Satan’s.

God is capable of enforcing His laws when He chooses, as the Bible clearly shows us. In the meantime, God's law requires us to evangelize non-Christians, not condemn or punish them.

 

[Chesterton]

In poor neighborhoods they are less likely to own a car.

The distinction is that last minute ID laws are more likely to impact poor people. in some parts of the country poor people are more likely to be racial minorities.

Have there been any lawsuits over this? I couldn't find anything, but I might not be entering the right search terms.

 

[Bradskii]

You know what, if someone wants to go to that much trouble to get to vote...

The point being made is that no-one should need to do anything as nonsensical as that.

 

[Bradskii]

It won’t happen, most likely. I’m just giving my opinion.

That's all we are doing. Finding out what sort of views people have. And your view is that there should be no democracy.

 

[BCP1928]

Have there been any lawsuits over this? I couldn't find anything, but I might not be entering the right search terms.

Court Cases | American Civil Liberties Union

Representing Common Cause and two D.C. voters, the ACLU Voting Rights Project and has filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that D.C. turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license...

www.aclu.org

 

[dogs4thewin]

It was, and you’ll either have God’s laws or Satan’s.

Actually, several of the founders were DEISTS. This would mean that it waas not founded as a CHRISTIAN nation as several of the founders did not consider themselves Christians.

As to God's law or Satan's is that sggesting people who are not Christians cannot be trusted. There are millions of people in this world who do not claim to be Christians who are very trustworthy and follow man's law.

 

[dogs4thewin]

Feminism was penned by Satan. The Man is the head of the Woman for a reason.

and what happens if a man either A is not a provider B is abusive or just leaves the woman women need to have some abilities to provide for themselves does not mean that it is not an ideal situation for the man to be the head of household but sometimes that is just not the case.

 

[dogs4thewin]

Do you think Jesus intended no-fault divorce, sexual “freedom”, and abortion on demand to occur? Because those are the fruits of feminism.

Anything can go too far one can not support abortion or demand and still feel that women should in most respects be equal to men in as far as rights and opportunities.

 

[dogs4thewin]

If men had taken responsibility and kept their pants on, those 16,000,000 would have never been conceived. Let’s finally lay responsibility where it belongs.

it takes two

 

[dogs4thewin]

That’s what abortion is all about.

depends There are many women that have children and seek an abortion. There are also many a woman that gets an abortion early in life and later go on to want and have children. Just because a woman has or has had an abortion does not mean that she wants no more births

 

[dogs4thewin]

At this point I’m not surprised that you’ve taken such a worldly, anti-biblical stance.

Not everyone is a Christian and I will just be honest I canot stand when people treat it as if Christians are the "only ones on the block" and feel that a country should be a "Christian nation". We are not the only ones here and honestly people who wish that were either have not read history or think we are "better" than history which has repeatedly been shown to not be the case.