- Oct 19, 2004
- 12,811
- 6,013
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
I was curious about taking every kind of support animals due to other people's allergies:
Woman has allergic reaction to dog on plane at Oakland Airport
(From the article):
If you traveled by air over the holidays you may have noticed some furry passengers getting on planes.
This past Thursday at Oakland International Airport, Erskine Patton was a passenger on Alaska Airlines flight 335 to Seattle.
"As I was boarding I noticed that a woman was breathing uneasily," said Patton.
That passenger seated near a dog was having an asthma attack. Airport Ops called for help.
"I was just concerned for this woman," said Patton.
Patton tweeted "@AlaskaAir "Why are dogs allowed on board when allergy risk is possible? We don't know the status of this poor woman and many passengers will miss their connections."
@AlaskaAir tweeted back, "Oh no! Unfortunately, we simply cannot guarantee animals will not be on board as many are service animals."
Woman has allergic reaction to dog on plane at Oakland Airport
(From the article):
If you traveled by air over the holidays you may have noticed some furry passengers getting on planes.
This past Thursday at Oakland International Airport, Erskine Patton was a passenger on Alaska Airlines flight 335 to Seattle.
"As I was boarding I noticed that a woman was breathing uneasily," said Patton.
That passenger seated near a dog was having an asthma attack. Airport Ops called for help.
"I was just concerned for this woman," said Patton.
Patton tweeted "@AlaskaAir "Why are dogs allowed on board when allergy risk is possible? We don't know the status of this poor woman and many passengers will miss their connections."
@AlaskaAir tweeted back, "Oh no! Unfortunately, we simply cannot guarantee animals will not be on board as many are service animals."
Last edited: