Hi 3sigma,
I agree with you about General Apologetics and I noted this earlier, but now on top of having my threads closed, one of my posts in a closed thread has been selectively deleted. How do you feel about that?
I understand it may be difficult to come here as an outsider in many respects and experience moderation when asking questions as it can seem related, "Hmm, I asked about this, no answer was forthcoming and my post was deleted... what are they hiding/scared of?". That's pretty understandable, but I don't know if I can say enough how this is not the case here. There are rules for this forum, some I don't agree with, but ultimately I have no mod powers here (I'm only a trainee) and for the record I didn't report/delete any of your posts/threads.
[FONT="]I am completely sincere about finding the truth, which is why I ask questions and seek sound, objective evidence. What makes you think I am not sincere? About what do you think I am not sincere?[/FONT]
Well it's not up to me to dictate what you feel, but from experience here and in other debates and conversations with people, I think I (and quite likely other posters here) recognise sincerity in a snap. From what you have posted it, it is apparent you have a very strong emotional attachment to your worldview, which is not uncommon, every one of us has an emotional attachment of some degree to our worldview, it's impossibe not to - but you certainly hold on to some arguments ferociously, and have a great reluctance to accept anything that would alleviate any perceived issues you have. Lets look at the God and omniscience question you posted. There were several replies in there the two main being that God knows everything, fine details included and that doesn't interfere with our free-will because it doesn't constrain our decisions or force us to choose in any way, the other is that God has limited omniscience, this would explain prophecy but also accomodate free-will even if you (that's
you) believe that by God knowing all God would restrict our choices.
You didn't like either of these views. Also, soemone earlier demonstrated that sound, objective evidence is a red-herring, yet you are still clinging to that, as per your emotional attachment to your worldview.
So, my conclusion, and I don't think I am alone, is that you certainly have an interest in this, but you are by no means ready or willing to change anything you currently, believe, unless by only a tiny margin.
I don't think that's an unfair assessment, do you? Also as I mentioned earlier, one way to find someone who is genuinely interested, is to ask for them to PM you to continue a discussion where the forum rules do not permit, and out of all the people I've offered that too, I've had maybe 5 total take me up on that offer, in about a years worth of posts here.
Also, and this is the kicker, the
type of questions people post, reveal volumes about their intent. Most, come here with a supposed magic-bullet question, one that they believe is the end-all to Christianity. I don't think I've met anyone who has had issues with whether God knew everything or not, whether we had free-will or not, whether we believed in evolution or not and having
those questions/answers be the foundational issue with their disbelief in God. Which is why I said to you earlier, that regardless of what we (Christians) believe about the details, we all proclaim the same thing, and thus, the details are not important - that's not saying we can believe untrue things, we all believe we hold the right view about things such as evolution or omniscience, but IF that view changes, our belief in God does not, which is dearest to us.
Cheers,
Digit