Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That would show that the Square-Cube law is working perfectly. Take a look at an elephant or rhino and tell me that their legs dont look immensly strong.....?
Behemoth would probably step on an elephant and rhinoceros; or use it's massive tail to send a whole herd into the next county.
Well ... you got the right idea anyway.You mean like this.
So what?
I have changed shape in my life as well. After all, a mature woman does not have the same body shape as a young girl.
So what exactly is your point here?
So what?
I have changed shape in my life as well. After all, a mature woman does not have the same body shape as a young girl.
So what exactly is your point here?
Were you considered a Homo ergaster then, and a Homo sapiens now?
Still waiting for you to say what your problem with the video is. Is it: "if you got two species wrong you got them all wrong"? Please don't be that one.
I don't need a video on shape-shifting to know that.
According to Wikipedia, some think Homo ergaster is a one-size-fits-all category that actually contains Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens.
I'm under the impression Homo ergaster was once a tax paying contributing member of society that God laid a "wonderful plague" upon.
According to Wikipedia, some think Homo ergaster is a one-size-fits-all category that actually contains Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens.
Post of the month.Funny how Homo ergaster and Homo sapiens bones are not found in the same strata, isn't it?
Post of the month.
According to Wikipedia, some think Homo ergaster is a one-size-fits-all category that actually contains Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens.
Not this Wikipedia: Homo ergaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Post of the month.
Because I put Homo sapiens on the list by mistake?1) Wikipedia does not say what you claim it does (which means you are spreading false information).
Some paleoanthropologists consider H. ergaster to be simply the African variety of H. erectus; this leads to the use of the term "Homo erectus sensu stricto" for the Asian H. erectus, and "Homo erectus sensu lato" for the larger species comprising both the early African populations (H. ergaster) and the Asian populations. The latest discoveries go even further claiming that all five contemporary species of early "Homo" in Africa, "Homo habilis", "Homo rudolfensis", "Homo ergaster", and "Homo erectus" are representatives from the same species,
Were you considered a Homo ergaster then, and a Homo sapiens now?
Then your example can take a hike.So what?
I have changed shape in my life as well. After all, a mature woman does not have the same body shape as a young girl.
So what exactly is your point here?
Were you considered a Homo ergaster then, and a Homo sapiens now?
I believe you have been told countless times that individuals don't evolve, populations do over many generations...
The point I'm making is the same animal being mistaken for two different ones.
FYI: That does not invalidate evolution.
I also think it's funny that you guys claim God is being deceptive, while all the time yo Mamma [Nature] has been fooling you.
It's okay for Mother Nature to shape shift and fool you guys, but let God shape shift someone's bones and hooboy, look out -- it's deception central.
Even though God documented it -- (Psalm 39).
I also think it's funny that you guys claim God is being deceptive, while all the time yo Mamma [Nature] has been fooling you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?