• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Setting the Record Straight

Status
Not open for further replies.

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So do you also believe that what AV Posted is true?

.
Are you here as his judge? Are you here to persecute? Do you have the capacity to discern each point?

Three strikes and your out.

You have become a fault finder in the Last Days!

.


.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,885
17,790
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟457,051.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
.
Are you here as his judge? Are you here to persecute? Do you have the capacity to discern each point?

Three strikes and your out.

You have become a fault finder in the Last Days!

.

.

Does answering that question frighten you so much?
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Are you here as his judge? Are you here to persecute? Do you have the capacity to discern each point?

Three strikes and your out.

You have become a fault finder in the Last Days!

:o
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,862
✟344,471.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Do you have the capacity to discern each point?

I can certainly assure you that at no time did everyone in the world speak English.

Nor, in spite of the way it is sometimes misused, is Strong's Concordance is "a tool of Satan."

I could go on -- do you really endorse such statements?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,727
52,531
Guam
✟5,133,469.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I can certainly assure you that at no time did everyone in the world speak English.
What did they speak then?

Everyone in the world ... as you put it ... at one time consisted of just two people.

What specific language did they speak, in your opinion?
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
What did they speak then?

Everyone in the world ... as you put it ... at one time consisted of just two people.

What specific language did they speak, in your opinion?

As they were created by God, it would stand to reason that they spoke God's language.

As God eventually chose, of all the people of the world at the time, the Hebrews, it would stand to reason that they spoke the right language.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,727
52,531
Guam
✟5,133,469.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
.
Are you here as his judge? Are you here to persecute? Do you have the capacity to discern each point?

Three strikes and your out.

You have become a fault finder in the Last Days!

.


.
Wow, talk about jumping the shark. All he asked was if you agree with AV on those points. You have a serious persecution complex if you think that counters as persecution!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,727
52,531
Guam
✟5,133,469.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
All he asked was if you agree with AV on those points.
This same person who asked that also showed up in a thread that a buddy of mine made, when he threw a party when I hit one million posts; and hinted that I may have used a bot -- and they put him in his place.

Later, this same person visited my visitor's message box and put two disgusting pictures in it because I resurrected a couple of threads that had good questions in them -- and I had to appeal to authority for their removal.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
This same person who asked that also showed up in a thread that a buddy of mine made, when he threw a party when I hit one million posts; and hinted that I may have used a bot -- and they put him in his place.

Later, this same person visited my visitor's message box and put two disgusting pictures in it because I resurrected a couple of threads that had good questions in them -- and I had to appeal to authority for their removal.
:o

Ewww.

(I still maintain that it's jumping the shark, as Heissonear presumably doesn't know any of that, and it would be less hostile to just say 'yes' or 'no'. Still... ewwww)
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
What does "jumping the shark" mean?

Is that the same as our, "jumping the gun"?
I don't really know, so possibly. I always took it to mean 'getting ahead of yourself', or acting on false pretences.

But after looking at TLK Valentine's cited Wiki, I think I may have been using it wrong all these years! So yes, I actually meant 'jumping the gun' instead of 'jumping the shark', which in hindsight is completely meaningless :doh:.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,885
17,790
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟457,051.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
:o

Ewww.

(I still maintain that it's jumping the shark, as Heissonear presumably doesn't know any of that, and it would be less hostile to just say 'yes' or 'no'. Still... ewwww)

He's talking about the zombie thread pics
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I don't really know, so possibly. I always took it to mean 'getting ahead of yourself', or acting on false pretences.

But after looking at TLK Valentine's cited Wiki, I think I may have been using it wrong all these years! So yes, I actually meant 'jumping the gun' instead of 'jumping the shark', which in hindsight is completely meaningless :doh:.

Jumping the shark means something good rapidly turning really bad/stupid, and was coined when a Happy Days character literally jumped a shark, marking when a supposedly good show rapidly turned bad. It is more used to refer to entertainment than anything else, and does not mean "jumped the gun", which is coming to a conclusion too quickly or acting without thinking about the situation fully. They are often incorrectly used as if they mean the same thing, which they don't.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Jumping the shark means something good rapidly turning really bad/stupid, and was coined when a Happy Days character literally jumped a shark, marking when a supposedly good show rapidly turned bad. It is more used to refer to entertainment than anything else, and does not mean "jumped the gun", which is coming to a conclusion too quickly or acting without thinking about the situation fully. They are often incorrectly used as if they mean the same thing, which they don't.

I think I can translate for WC in a language he'll understand. That 2006 paper on CDM was "jumping the gun", whereas that last Lambda "sigma five" paper is jumping the shark. :) Every GR hotshot on planet Earth is going to want to take a bite of that paper. This is going to get ugly really fast. ;)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.