• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Seperating baptists and ana-baptists

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
This is interesting that in this site they are seperated.

I know church history has ana-baptists as mennonites.. open brethren.. other kinds of brethren.. but there were groups before the RCC and the Reformation that re-baptised .. Waldenses.. Paulicians.. Donatists etc.. named after the leaders in their communities.

It is not just mennonites.. brethren etc. that try to link to these groups. Independent baptists also link to these groups as they had 'baptistic' beliefs.

I know some try to create a line from modern day churches to the pre-RCC churches and say they can prove it. That is a fruitless exercise and takes away from Jesus Christ. Even though there may be a line that is unbroken that goes from those churches to now.. the records of the groups that show this line have been persecuted and cut off by the knife. They also weren't interested in recording their own history.

But anyway..

I think baptists and ana-baptists could be in the same group. Independent baptists especially have close association to churches going way way back.
 

9Rock9

Sinner in need of grace.
Nov 28, 2018
296
187
South Carolina
✟97,506.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
While I think we have a lot of similarities on the surface, there are also some differences that warrant us being put in separate categories.

Baptists, for instance, are more likely to be Calvinistic. Also, I think the Anabaptists place less emphasis on individualism than Baptists do.
 
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
Yes many baptists have taken on Calvinism, which is a bit of a problem. Hardshell and reformed baptists especially have. I'm unsure why they would want to, but I think it must be a historical thing of having roots in the reformation.

Independent Baptists usually don't trace themselves to the reformation and ones like my church reject Calvinism. Churches like mine re-baptise believers from unscriptural churches... Which is an ana-baptist thing.
 

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Baptists come from English Puritan Separatists in the 16th century in England. Anabaptists came out of radical groups of the Swiss reformation. The culture and ethos of the churches are very different. Anabaptists do not believe in an invisible church, they have a more radical separation of the Church and state, and they are much less individualistic in their view of salvation. Traditionally, they also did not baptise by immersion, but by effusion (pouring).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced

Well, this is where it gets a bit more interesting.

It depends what is meant by Anabaptists.

If it just means any group who will re-baptise believers from an unscriptural church or denomination.. then that includes independent Baptists who re-baptise...and not just Mennonites, open brethren etc..

You see my church will re-baptise like that. Not about salvation but joining a bible believing church. That makes us Anabaptist by that practice... But we are also Baptist in name and not brethren or such like.

We also reject the idea of an invisible universal church (or universal visible) church. But we are Baptist.

Baptists did not start in the 1600s. That is when they developed a confession of faith though. Baptists over history are the only body of Christians to have never symbolised with Rome. That would include many Anabaptists.
 
Reactions: Aaron112
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

Anabaptists aren't just defined by baptism of adults only, they also have theological and practical distinctives, like a synergistic soteriology, a peace testimony, and so on. They are an entirely different traditions from Baptists.
 
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
Anabaptists aren't just defined by baptism of adults only, they also have theological and practical distinctives, like a synergistic soteriology, a peace testimony, and so on. They are an entirely different traditions from Baptists.

Okay, well I am starting to understand the difference more now. I agree there are ana-baptists that are quite different to what we think of as baptists. I just don't think it's truth to give the baptists are starting date in line with the reformers. Baptist distinctive doctrine and churches go way way back before the reformers. Most didn't have the baptist name.. but had the doctrine.

Groups that had these distinctives were nicknamed ana-baptists, such as Paulicians, Waldenses, Donatists. Later the name 'baptist' got used instead of ana-baptist. Not all these groups had the same teaching.. but were united on autonomy of the local church, adult baptism by immersion, individual liberty and salvation through Jesus Christ.

So maybe the ana-baptist name is given to too many groups. Some are more different to the baptistic teachings we know. Quakers and Amish come to mind as groups that are more different to baptist.. but I think are included in the ana-baptist name.

I get my information from My Church by J.M Moody and The Battle For Baptist History by I.K.Cross
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

Weldensians were not Baptists. They were started by Peter Waldo, who lived a life similar to Francis of Assisi.

Peter Waldo was a 12th century Italian merchant that sold everything he had and lived in apostolic poverty as a beggar. His followers believed in reading the Bible privately in conventicles or small groups, and they were persecuted by over-zealous clergy who feared their influence, but otherwise they didn't have distinctive beliefs or practices from other medieval Catholics. Later followers of his in the Piedmonte region of central Italy joined the Reformed churches, many went north to France as refugees. Waldensians still exist, and they baptize infants, as other Reformed Protestants do.
 
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced

Okay.. so what historical book is this information from? If it is Catholics writing about Waldenses.. then it has to be taken with a grain of salt. If it's non-christians writing about Waldenses then it will have a no divine intervention bias before even looking at their history. The writers of My Church and another book The History of the Baptists.. knew this factor and so were careful with information about these groups that was from the persecutors themselves.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

I did my own research on the Waldensians years ago because some of my ancestors were Hugenots, and some genetic testing I did suggested I might have had Waldensian ancestors.
 
Reactions: Indybap
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
I did my own research on the Waldensians years ago because some of my ancestors were Hugenots, and some genetic testing I did suggested I might have had Waldensian ancestors.
That's interesting. I know there are two main different takes on the Waldenses... One is that Waldo wasn't the founder of their movement but a key leader among them. That what the Waldenses had was from earlier groups that could link themselves to the apostolic time churches.

Also that they did not associate themselves initially with the Catholics. Indeed being persecuted by them.


The other take is that they started with Waldo.. and were linked with Catholics and later the reformers

This is where I think that it is the core beliefs that you look at rather than the direct trace of who they were in history. The history is written mostly by the persecutors who saw them as heretics, but in the case of the RCC were heretical themselves.

Ive probably got big holes in what I know about the Waldenses.. but who do you take the right history from?
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Waldensians were persecuted because they were perceived to threaten the political order, not because they taught anything particularly distinctive in terms of Christian doctrines. This happened to many groups in the Middle Ages after the reforms of Pope Gregory.

The same is largely true with John Wycliffe. Aside from being somewhat iconclastic and regarding the Pope as unscriptural, he essentially had the same beliefs as any other medieval Catholic.

Some historians don't even think the Cathars really existed in the form commonly understood (as Gnostics or Manicheans), for instance, that they were just lay preachers, and were persecuted for initially political, and not religious reasons, and the inquisitors made up legends about them based on false testimonies created under duress (detective work was unscientific during this time period, most people were more interested in upholding order than critically discerning the veracity of evidence).
 
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
Interesting. I'll relook at what I've read.

The thing I will say is Jesus promises His churches would be always existing and they would have a general distinctive set of beliefs.

Therefore there will be churches with the same central beliefs going all thru history.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

Indybap

Active Member
Mar 16, 2023
25
10
47
Woolston
✟29,367.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Divorced
Yes



No, I don't recall him ever making that promise.
Well what I mean is .. Jesus did not promise they would have a distinctive set of beliefs.. but the NT churches were characterised by a set of biblical beliefs.

I realised I got the wording wrong after posting sorry.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Well what I mean is .. Jesus did not promise they would have a distinctive set of beliefs.. but the NT churches were characterised by a set of biblical beliefs.

I realised I got the wording wrong after posting sorry.

N.T. churches didn't even have the same Bible we do today.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,385
20,697
Orlando, Florida
✟1,500,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
But they were receiving letters from Paul and others that guided them in the right way

They were also reading alot of other letters that aren't in our Bibles today.
 
Upvote 0

EJ M

Active Member
Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2018
254
123
MT
✟126,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married



 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,061
20,301
29
Nebraska
✟733,110.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Baptists were founded by John Smyth who was a former Anglican cleric who re-baptized himself because he didn't believe in infant Baptism. They are influenced by Calvinist theology. Anabaptists include Mennonites, Amish, Hutterites etc. They separated from the Roman Catholic Church. The Amish separated from the Mennonites etc.
 
Upvote 0