• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,920
6,522
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,261,181.00
Faith
Atheist
Not really. No one ever puts 3 apples on a table, takes 7 away, and photographs the -4 apples on the table to determine the outcome of the experiment. Euclid didn't use a protractor to determine that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.

Euclidean geometry is a game based on assuming a set of axioms, and seeing what logically follows. No empirical evidence is necessary. All mathematics is the same. It may have utility in empirical science; certain branches may have been motivated by empirical questions, but it is not really empirical itself.

I would say the foundations are both empirical and inductive in nature. We observe that 1 + 1 = 2. I would, however, agree that things like negative number are conceptual extensions in cases like negative apples. However a vector with a negative magnitude can be real. For example, if I am heading -5 miles/hr north, I am heading +5 mph south. It's real.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,920
6,522
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,261,181.00
Faith
Atheist
In a sense, I suppose. But I have observed a single object. Having observed that single object and then placing another object with the previous object, I arrive at an idea of distinguishing the quality of the first situation from the quality of the second. We give names to those ideas and observe that it is never the case that 1 + 1 doesn't equal two. We have arrived at a generalized mathematical principle through induction by observing reality.

The foundation of the concept of 1 is empirical. The quibble here, I'm guessing, is that I would agree that the concept of 1 is abstract, but I'm saying we arrived at the concept and the need for the concept by processing reality.
 
Upvote 0

.Mikha'el.

7x13=28
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
May 22, 2004
34,920
6,976
41
British Columbia
✟1,400,988.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
MOD HAT ON!

Thread cleaned.

Blasphemy
It is considered blasphemy to insult or mock Christianity or any part of the Trinity-Father (God), Son (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit. Honest debate about the nature of God and Christian Theology is allowed, but derogatory remarks are not.

MOD HAT OFF!
 
Upvote 0