Not really. No one ever puts 3 apples on a table, takes 7 away, and photographs the -4 apples on the table to determine the outcome of the experiment. Euclid didn't use a protractor to determine that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.
Euclidean geometry is a game based on assuming a set of axioms, and seeing what logically follows. No empirical evidence is necessary. All mathematics is the same. It may have utility in empirical science; certain branches may have been motivated by empirical questions, but it is not really empirical itself.
I would say the foundations are both empirical and inductive in nature. We observe that 1 + 1 = 2. I would, however, agree that things like negative number are conceptual extensions in cases like negative apples. However a vector with a negative magnitude can be real. For example, if I am heading -5 miles/hr north, I am heading +5 mph south. It's real.
Upvote
0