Why not just answer, yes I believe in gravity and no, fish do not need bicycles?
Yep, good. I see that splitting it up like this has been used now.
For me, I would answer that the empirical worldview (which is clear about areas where there is evidence, such as the question of gravity or evolution, and agnostic in other areas, like the existence of some kind of God), is the most authoritative. Note that this includes the worldview of a Christian who does't deny evidence.
For the second part "having more value than other areas", I would disagree, since many other areas are very "valuable", and that the question itself is difficult to answer, since "value" is subjective. A similar question would be "do you agree that vanilla is the best flavor?".
Of course this will now become and analogy argument, arguing if your analogy accurately represents my post. At this point, the original question will be (hopefully?) forgotten.
I don't think so. In both the other posters and myself, this has allowed the conversation to move forward.
In Christ-
Papias
Upvote
0